D - ESP

<<         >>

"Moon plays": Moon was Earth - truth and lie in the atmosphere - the moon lie

Apollo 11 (03): foot prints from "moon boots", flag, camera with cable, stones without shadows, reflector

Impossible foot prints - impossible flag - camera cable with broken shadow - stones without shadow - reflector without foot prints - moon lie with Apollo 11

Analysis by Michael Palomino (2006)

Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5464: There are coming foot prints from a slope from nowhere. All foot prints are photo composition, and here the NASA manipulators left work too early.		Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5477: These white spots are said to be stones. The shadows are missing. These are stones without shadows. The NASA manipulators have gone to their break too early...		Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5498: Around the reflector which is said having been planted "on the moon" - there are missing any foot prints. The reflector is implanted into the photo...
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5467, there is a flag in an impossible shape which never changes. The flag is implanted into the photo.		Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5467, there is also a camera, but the camera has a rounded shadow which does not correspond with the angular camera. There is also a camera cable which is said to be linked with the "Lunar Module"...		Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5480: investigating precisely the camera cable one can see that the shadow of the cable is "broken" sometimes...

There are things which even don't exist, and the stupid journalists never report this!

Comment
This is NOT a conspiracy theory, stupid journalist, but these are the facts which prove that moon landings partly have happened in moon halls and in photo compositions. You don't believe it? The facts will stay.

Michael Palomino 2009

Abbreviations
DAC: "Data Acquisition Camera"
LM: "Lunar Module"
LMP: "Lunar Module Pilot"
RCS: "Reaction Control System"
CSM: "Command Service Module"
EVA: "Extra Vehicular Activity"
LRRR: "Lunar Ranging Retro Reflector"

Foot prints, an "American" flag in an impossible shape which always remains the same, and a camera with a cable with broken shadow

	Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5460: NASA claims that the foot prints would be from "astronaut" Edwin ("Buzz") Aldrin http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5460.jpg Photo composition: -- it seems as if there are much too less foot prints -- it seems as if at many stones is missing the shadow. The much too less foot prints and the stones without shadows are indications for an incomplete photo composition.
	Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5461: NASA claims that the photo was from "astronaut" Edwin ("Buzz") Aldrin who had moved a little to the right to make this photo. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5461.jpg Photo composition: -- it seems as if there are much too less foot prints -- it seems as if at many stones is missing the shadow. The much too less foot prints and the stones without shadows are indications for an incomplete photo composition.
	Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5462: NASA claims that this photo was taken by "astronaut" Edwin ("Buzz") Aldrin, who had moved now a little to the left to take this photo. The photo is more or less identical with it's scarce foot prints with photo no. AS11-37-5460. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5462.jpg Photo composition: -- it seems as if there are much too less foot prints -- it seems as if at many stones is missing the shadow. The much too less foot prints and the stones without shadows are indications for an incomplete photo composition.
	Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5463: NASA claims that this photo with it's scarce foot prints had been taken by Edwin ("Buzz") Aldrin who had moved a little bit to the right. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5463.jpg Photo composition: -- it seems as if there are much too less foot prints -- it seems as if at many stones is missing the shadow. The much too less foot prints and the stones without shadows are indications for an incomplete photo composition.
	Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5464: NASA claims that the photo had been taken by "astronaut" Edwin ("Buzz") Aldrin who had considered now more from the right side, and there are more foot prints in the "moon dust" which seem more or less unreal. And there are more stones without shadows... http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5464.jpg Photo composition: -- it seems as if there are much too less foot prints -- it seems as if at many stones is missing the shadow. -- add to this the photo is darker on the left and on the right margin which indicates a light enactment which is not possible "on the moon" without atmosphere and without clouds.
The much too less foot prints and the stones without shadows are indications for an incomplete photo composition. And the irregular light effect seems an indication that there were was not enough light in the moon hall. But there are the unreal foot prints yet. Let's see this in a close-up:   Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5464: close-up of the unreal foot prints Photo composition: -- the foot prints are barely paired, it seems that nobody was marching here in a "normal" way -- the foot prints at the lower margin of the photo suddenly begin, so there is the question how the "astronaut" had come there to walk downwards afterwards -- the foot prints heading to the endpoint are not paired, but only singular and weak -- at the endpoint there are much too few foot prints -- the foot prints in the upper half of the photo coming from the endpoint to the right are much too less to be real, resp. when one takes earnest these foot prints, the "astronaut" had jumped like a frog -- all in all the foot prints are not convincing and most probable they are another photo composition by the NASA manipulators.
	Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5465: This photo shows the shadow of the "Lunar Module", the foot prints and the shadow of the "American" flag. This was the "Extra Vehicular Activity" (EVA) of the "astronauts", NASA claims. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5465.jpg Photo composition: -- the "moon landscape" remains the same, and there remain many stones without shadows -- add to this the photo is darker at the left and at the right margin which indicates a romantic light enactment which is not possible "on the moon" without atmosphere and without clouds. So, the photo is a badly lighted and incomplete photo composition.
	Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5466: The photo shows the shadow of the "Lunar Module", foot prints and the complete "American" flag in color/colour. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5466.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5466HR.jpg Photo composition: -- the "lunar landscape" remains the same, and there are many stones without shadows -- the flag has got a strange form, obviously because the horizontal pole is too short and by this the flag has to be "folded together" a little bit -- the shadow of the flag seems - compared  with the shadow of the "Lunar Module" - much too long -- the shadow of the flag is going down a slope and ends in a plain, but the bending of the shadow is much too less for that -- strangely there is missing the "astronaut" on the photo who is setting up the flag there, and the reader must not know which "astronaut" has set up the flag there. This seems to be strange because the moment of the flag - the biggest nationalist moment of "moon landing" at all - is not in the NASA photo collection -- one can only estimate the height of the flag comparing the flagpole with the foot prints: 5 foot prints are  going with the flagpole, so the flag is about 1.5 m high.
All these conditions indicate a bad photo composition, and nobody must know who set up the flag in this bad manner there, and the shadow of the flag is drawn into the photo in a wrong manner without considering the slope. At least the shadow of the flag was not forgotten by the NASA manipulators... The close-up of the flag with it's shadow shows the sluttery of the NASA manipulators: Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5466: foot prints, unrealistic flag and unrealistic shadow of the flag in a close-up.
	Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5467: NASA claims there had been set up a camera aside the flag "on the moon", and from now on there is a camera cable over the "lunar surface" across the whole photo to the camera. And from now on there can be seen a linear shadow between the "Lunar Module" and the flag. Later NASA claims in it's comment for photo no. AS11-37-5471 that this is the shadow of a solar wind collector. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5467.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5467HR.jpg Photo composition: -- the "lunar landscape" remains the same, and there are many stones without shadows -- strangely NASA does not show us any photo of the "astronaut" who has set up the camera there "on the moon" which basically would be the most nationalist moment (this was a NASA manipulator in the NASA photo studio) -- the shadow of the camera is strangely round like an ellipse as if it would be the shadow of a ball, but the camera is a box, there must be something wrong with it -- and the foot prints leading to the camera are not conform, they are not paired. One cannot see who the "astronaut" has marched there, and at the camera where should be many foot prints for the installation of the tripod and of the camera - there is almost no foot print, and this is fairly unreal. Looking at the close-up of the camera "on the moon" one can see some more things which are not logic:
Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5467: close-up of the flag and the camera who were installed by Apollo 11 "on the moon" -- there are parts of the photo which are very sharp (e.g. the stones top left), but exactly the part with the camera and almost all foot prints are not sharp -- also the shadow of the camera is not sharp, but it seems that it does not correspond with the camera, because the camera is slimmer than the shadow. So as a viewer there is the question what has happened with the photo, above all, because the photos before were all very sharp or unsharp. A photo which is partly sharp and unsharp on the same height of the photo is principally not possible, or only for close-ups for special object. But here precisely the "interesting" object, the camera, is not sharp...
	Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5468: NASA claims this photo had been taken by the window of Edwin Aldrin of the "Lunar Module", and this would be the "lunar landscape" a little more to the right. Right of the flag there is the camera cable, and there is the shadow of the solar wind collector in the right angle to the cable. This collector is on the roof of the "Lunar Module", yet without leaf. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5468.jpg Photo composition: -- the "lunar landscape" remains the same, and there are many stones without shadows -- generally there is the question why the horizon is going down only because the photo is taken a little bit more right from the flag. It seems the photo is a common photo composition.
Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5469: NASA claims that this would be the "lunar landscape" right of the photo before no. AS11-37-5468. Looking precisely one can see arbitrary little shadows with big stones and long shadows with little stones, and the shadow lines are not coordinated. Again also this photo is partly sharp and unsharp, and the oblique horizon also seems to be impossible. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5469HR.jpg
	Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5470: NASA claims that this would be the "lunar soil" under the window of Edwin ("Buzz") Aldrin with foot prints, with the end of the flag (left) and with the tripod for the camera (top left). NASA does not mention up to this photo the camera cable and the shadow of the solar wind collector. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5470.jpg Photo composition: -- the "lunar landscape" remains the same, and there are many stones without shadows -- the foot prints are partly "turned to the outside" and are coming out of the "lunar soil" what also seems to be impossible.
	Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5471: NASA claims that this would be the "lunar soil" under Edwin ("Buzz") Aldrin's window with the foot prints, with the flag, and only now NASA mentions the solar wind collector which is installed beside the "Lunar Module" and it's shadow where is missing the foil yet. The foot prints partly are not real... http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5471.jpg Photo composition: -- the photo is partly sharp and not sharp -- the foot prints are partly "turned to the outside" and are coming out of the "lunar soil" what also seems to be impossible. The photo is a bad photo composition. The NASA manipulators forgot the framing of some foot prints.
	Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5472: Close-up of the "lunar soil", the camera cable and the shadow of the solar wind collector http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5472.jpg Photo composition: -- since the first photo of the flag the flag remains in precisely the same bulky position (AS11-37-5466) whereas there is action around the flag, and whereas there is no air drag "on the moon" and no atmosphere which should facilitate any movement. The bulky flag was implanted  into the photos. All photos with the flag are photo compositions.
	Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5473: NASA claims that the photo was "from the moon" a "little bit right" [effectively left] from the photo before AS11-37-5472. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5472.jpg Photo composition: The close-up detects, -- that the shadows of the stones of the lower half of the photo don't correspond with the shadows of the stones of the upper half of the photo -- there are also many stones without shadows -- the camera cable is interrupted sometimes or it's shadow is weak sometimes in a grey which is impossible with the extreme light conditions on the moon -- and the photo is sharp and unsharp at the same time. Wow, also this is an incomplete photo composition of the NASA manipulators who had enough of the heavy manipulation work. They have taken a rest after their overtime as it seems.
Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5473: NASA claims that this photo would be "from the moon" a "little bit right" from the photo before AS11-37-5472. The close-up shows a chaos of shadows, stones without shadows, the camera cable interrupted or with a grey week shadow line, and the photo is partly sharp or unsharp.
	Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5474: foot prints with shadow of the flag http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5474.jpg Many stones have no shadow...

White spots as stones, stones without shadow, and a reflector without foot prints around it

			Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5474: the shadow of the "Lunar Module" (LM) http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5475.jpg Again there are stones without shadows on the photo...
			Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5474: Another second photo of the shadow of the "Lunar Module" (LM) http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5476.jpg Photo composition: Again there are stones without shadow on the photo...
			Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5474: the shadow of the "Lunar Module" (LM) with the "lunar horizon", with many stones without shadows or with unfinished white spots as stones http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5477.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5477HR.jpg Photo composition: -- now there are even more stones without shadows, and there are even unfinished stones because there are many white spots there -- the light is not conform on the photo, parts are brighter and other parts are darker which is not possible. The close-up shows it distinctly:
Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5474: close-up of many stones without shadows or unfinished  white spots as stones
			Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5475: one more photo of the alleged shadow of the "Lunar Module" "on the moon" http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5475.jpg
			Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5476: one more photo of the alleged shadow of the "Lunar Module" "on the moon" http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5476.jpg Drawn shadow: -- for these photos are photo compositions, all indicates that the shadow of the "Lunar Module" is drawn, and add to this the shadow of the "Lunar Module" is unsharp what is absolutely incomprehensible.
			Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5477: one more photo of the alleged shadow of the "Lunar Module" "on the moon", this time again with the horizon and with many stones without shadow http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5477.jpg And again the margin of the big shadow of the "Lunar Module" is unsharp.
			Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5478: the shadow of the "lunar module", the foot prints and an shadow's end of the flag http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5478.jpg The margin of the shadow of the "lunar module" is staying unsharp...
			Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5479: the shadow of the flag http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5479.jpg Photo composition: -- the shadow of the flag shows always the same direction and always remains with the same length which is not possible considering the moon rotation.
			Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5480: NASA claims that this photo was taken by the window of "astronaut" Edwin ("Buzz") Aldrin, with the "American" flag and with the camera "on the moon". The first time NASA mentions the camera cable. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5480.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5480HR.jpg Photo composition: -- now the camera cable has it's shadow partly in lines or is again a grey shadow and not black, and one time it seems that the cable is even broken -- the cable itself is irregularly shaped and does not have a uniform curvature as if the cable would be from different spools. Here is the close-up which shows the broken cable with angular and grey shadows:
Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5480: close-up of the broken camera cable with partly grey and angular shadows
The following photos until AS11-37-5497 are all very similar. Then there is coming a new element into the "moon play", the "reflector":
			Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5498: now NASA claims that "astronauts" had set up a Lunar Ranging Retro Reflector (LRRR) on the moon The name for the reflector is impressive, but the photo not at all is impressive. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5498.jpg http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5498HR.jpg Photo composition: -- as one is accustomed from NASA, also in this case it's the same thing: around the set up object there are missing the foot prints, in this case around the reflector -- and again the viewer must not know which "astronaut" set up the reflector there. Without foot prints this would also work badly you know!
So, also this photo is a photo composition and the reflector is implanted into the photo. The NASA manipulators forgot the foot prints around the reflector of all the preparations and of the settings of the reflector. The NASA manipulators have left to make a break too early, or they were tired from the hard manipulation overtime work... The close-up shows it clearly: Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5498: close-up of the alleged Lunar Ranging Retro Reflector (LRRR): There are missing any foot prints around the reflector. So, the reflector must have been "floated" there by himself...
			Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5499: NASA showing the Lunar Ranging Retro Reflector (LRRR) without foot prints around it, a second time! http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5499.jpg Photo composition: -- as one is accustomed from NASA, also in this case it's the same thing: around the set up object there are missing the foot prints, in this case around the reflector -- and again the viewer must not know which "astronaut" set up the reflector there. Without foot prints this would also work badly you know! So, also this photo is a photo composition and the reflector is implanted into the photo. The NASA manipulators forgot the foot prints around the reflector of all the preparations and of the settings of the reflector. The NASA manipulators have left to make a break too early, or they were tired from the hard manipulation overtime work...
			Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5504: NASA showing the Lunar Ranging Retro Reflector (LRRR) without foot prints around it, a third time! It seems that it's not at all embarrassing for NASA! http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5504.jpg Photo composition: -- as one is accustomed from NASA, also in this case it's the same thing: around the set up object there are missing the foot prints, in this case around the reflector -- and again the viewer must not know which "astronaut" set up the reflector there. Without foot prints this would also work badly you know! So, also this photo is a photo composition and the reflector is implanted into the photo. The NASA manipulators forgot the foot prints around the reflector of all the preparations and of the settings of the reflector. The NASA manipulators have left to make a break too early, or they were tired from the hard manipulation overtime work... Again there is a close-up, let's see, an original from NASA:
Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5504: close-up of the alleged Lunar Ranging Retro Reflector (LRRR) set up "on the moon": There are missing any foot prints around the reflector. So, the reflector must have "floated" there, and it does not seem at all embarrassing for NASA to show this bug also a third time...
			Apollo 11 photo no. AS11-37-5505: foot prints at the "Lunar Module" http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5505.jpg Photo composition: -- there can be seen "perfect" and flat foot prints as they can be seen in wet sand on the beach of Florida or somewhere else only, but for sure not in the dry "moon dust". The photo is a complete photo composition as all other photos before.

Conclusion: There was no "moon landing" of Apollo 11
The mistakes on the photos of Apollo 11 are big bugs and at the same time impressive. It seems absolutely doubtful why the stupid journalists want to go on selling a "moon landing" to the public considering the impossible foot prints, the stones without shadows or white spots as stones, with objects set there without foot prints, with flags in impossible and never changing shapes, and with a broken camera cable with an angular and grey shadow. And the margin of the shadow of the "Lunar Module" if often unsharp, which is absolutely impossible.

So, it's proved that the photos of Apollo 11 are photo compositions with drawn, partly false shadows. And not only this: The NASA manipulators let down the command module with the service module instead of the "lunar module", and the caos of shadows with the crater near the "lunar module" was a total one. So, the "moon landing" of Apollo 11 is a lie. The word "moon lie" is right for Apollo 11. But the journalists cannot report this, because NASA is CIA itself...

This is NOT a conspiracy theory, stupid journalist, but these are the facts which prove that moon landings partly have happened in moon halls and in photo compositions. You don't believe it? The facts will stay.

<<        >>