from:
-- Gerhard Wisnewski: Lügen im Weltraum (engl.: Lies in
space); Knaur 2005
-- James R. Hansen: Spaceflight Revolution:
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/contents.htm, in
special: http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm
The emergency situation for
the "USA" after sputnik - the construction of
simulating machines at Langley (Hampton, Virginia) and
Houston (Manned Spacecraft Center) and others
Since Sputnik the space flight simulation center at
Langley is enlarged as a vision for technical wisdom
that does not yet exist in reality. The principle
according Wisnewski is: "One needs a simulator machine
because the own ambition overruns the capacity."
(In: James R. Hansen, NASA historian: Spaceflight
Revolution, SP-4308, S.369; electronic edition:
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/contents.htm; Wisnewski,
p.283)
[By this "USA" begins to put billions of $ of tax sums
into so called "centers for manned space flight", e.g.
the "Manned spacecraft center", with simulators and all
other fantasies for "space flight":
-- at Langley in Hampton (Virginia)
-- at Houston (Texas)
-- the Kennedy Space Center in Florida etc.
The simulation centers are sprinkled over the "USA" in a
kind that more or less in half of the "USA" is situated
one so at least half of the population can be infected
with the "moon fever" or "space fever" and will be
manipulated in this manner. And this works...].
NASA centers for "training" of the
"moon landing"
|
Map with the NASA centers |
 Position
of Langley Air Force Base and of Langley
Research Center near Hampton (Virginia), aside
the Langley Air Force Base. |
Map with
the Position of Johnson Space Center (ex Manned
Spacecraft Center) near Houston. |
Map with
the Position of Kennedy Space Center. |
Langley, Houston etc.:
Perfect "moon film" simulations
The standard book about the simulation centers [faking
centers] is the book "Spaceflight Revolution" by NASA
historian James R. Hansen (Wisnewski, p.289).
[This is no conspiracy theory, stupid journalist, but
Hansen describes first-hand facts].
According to Hansen the "moon theaters" at Langley are
rehearsed in any detail like in a theater also with
general rehearsals etc. (Wisnewski, p.273). At the end
one cannot distinguish anything from a "real
performance" (Wisnewski, p.274). So, there is only a
little step to pretend simulated films as real "moon
films", but it's a "big step for mankind".
Wisnewski:
<With the simulation machinery of Langley any, but
really any situation of the Apollo missions could be
simulated or put into scene - as anybody wanted. The
border between simulation and total staging was really
thin - for NASA a very little step." In the "moon film"
this little step was called "a big step for
mankind>... (Wisnewski, p.292)
Simulation centers: The
"control center" at Houston is not controlling
anything!
The control center at Houston has nothing to say
concerning the simulation centers. Houston control
center has no control what is simulated and what is not
simulated.
<The CM simulator [Command Module Simulator at
Houston] (Wisnewski, p.275): This simulator could
pretend a real command module to the control center, by
transmitting the measuring data from the simulator
capsule into the control center.> (Wisnewski, p.276).
<Simulations were easy to perform. The instructors
disconnected the extern stations of Manned Space Flight
network and connected the data stream of their own
simulation machinery...The controller in the Mission
Control Center did not know where the data came from and
they were not interested in either.> (Wisnewski,
p.277)
[So, the "control center" at Houston was not at all a
"control center", but Langley at Hampton and the Manned
Space Flight Center at Houston (Texas) were the "control
centers" without having said this any time. And the
media never want to have realized it...]
The simulators
Command Module Mission
Simulator at Houston (MSC)
(Wisnewski, p.275)
|
Command
Module Mission Simulator at Manned
Spacecraft Center MSC at Houston, exterior view.
NASA foto no. S-67-3922.
|
 |
|
Training's
foto in the Command Module Mission Simulator
at Houston at the Manned Spacecraft Center
(MSC), building 5: Thomas K. Mattingly
II, pilot of the command capsule (foreground),
Charles M. Duke J., pilot for the Lunar Module
(right in the background), astronaut John W.
Young, commander (left). Training for Apollo
16, foto from 14.3.1972, foto no.:
S72-31047
|
Command Module Simulator
(CM simulator) for the working operations of the
atmosphere ship and for the fly characteristics
Actions are:
-- to run the atmosphere ship
-- to steer the atmosphere ship, navigation
-- the simulation pretends real signals, acoustically
and optically (Wisnewski, p.275).
Command Module Simulator (CM simulator)
|
Command
Module Simulator (CM-Simulator), exterior view
with astronaut Jim Lovell 7.4.1970, foto no.
70-H-467
|
Interior
view with astronauts Thomas P. Stafford
(commander), John W. Young (command module
pilot), Eugene A. Cernan (pilot of the Lunar
Module). 15.1.1968, foto no. S68-15952
|
Lunar Module
Simulator, LM Simulator
(Wisnewski, p.275) |
Grumman Lunar Module Simulator |
Interior view of Lunar Module Simulator with
Conrad and Bean |
Lunar Module Mission
Simulator 1968-1972
(Wisnewski, p.280) |
Lunar
Module Mission Simulator at Houston in Manned
Spacecraft Center (MSC), building 5, exterior
view, 1.11.1967, foto no. S67-15795
|
Lunar
Module Mission Simulator, interior view, at
Houston in Manned Spacecraft Center (MSC),
building 5, 1.11.1967, foto no. S67-15794
|
There comes up the question why there was training on
the Lunar Module Mission Simulator only since 1968 when
the project is a "moon landing" which should take place
in one year (Wisnewski, p.280-281). In the Lunar Module
Mission Simulator the astronauts look on four screens
with a projected, artificial moon surface, and the
simulation can pretend scenes until to the "moon
landing". The "moon astronauts" even stay therein over
night having preparation for the situation "on the
moon".
(In: Cradle of Aviation Museum;
www.cradleofaviation.org/exhibits/space/Im_simulator/sim.html;
Wisnewski, p.281)
Also the coordination
between capsule and Lunar Module is simulated
(Wisnewski, p.275)
And also the docking
procedures (Docking Simulator, "Rendezvous-Simulator")
are simulated
(Wisnewski, p.292)
The docking procedures were rehearsed soon already
within the Gemini program and continued during the
Apollo program.
The moon crane: The "Lunar
Landing Research Facility": "Moon landing" on the rope
- on a "Lunar surface"
[The fotos have the abbreviation "EL" which probably
stands for "elevator"].
"Langley Research Center" builds a big overhead crane,
almost 80 m high and 120 m long, for having "landed" a
Lunar Module "as an exercise", with an artificial moon
surface (Wisnewski, p.281).
The crane is completed in 1965.
(http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm)
[By this it's easy to play "moon landing"]. In this way
a plenty of "landing films" are made (Wisnewski, p.281),
[which are later presented as blurred TV films of a
"moon landing" in the whole world].
The moon crane at Langley (Virginia)
("Lunar Landing Research Facility")
|
The moon
crane / overhead crane at Langley for the "moon
landing", sight from above |
The moon
crane / overhead crane,sight from the bottom up,
2 July 1964, foto no. EL-2001-00424. |
The moon crane costs 3.5 Mio. $, relatively cheap
compared with other simulators. Principally the moon
crane shall simulate the gravitation on the moon taking
the Lunar Module in the air and with a functioning
engine of the Lunar Module. By this there should be a
simulation of 1/6 of the Earth's gravitation (Wisnewski,
p.283) [which is the gravitation on the moon calculated
by space physicians].
On the moon crane hang only little "Lunar Modules"
("Moon Landing Vehicles") with a little cabin for just
one person:
A "Lunar Landing
Vehicle" with a round cabin on the top, foto no.
L-1963-09781.
[The "Lunar Landing Vehicles" have no ascent module and
the cabin is only for one person].
To play "moon landing" with a moon
crane and with the "Lunar Landing Vehicle"
|
 |
By this
one can play "moon landing" very comfortable.
A moon landing vehicle with cabin on the top
in different positions is shown on the
foto "Lunar Lander Multiple Exposure",
foto no. EL-1996-00001.
Moon
crane at Langley. A Lunar Landing Vehicle
with angular cabin is hanging on the rope
during the day, foto no. EL-1996-00200.
|
|
|
|
The moon crane with several
positions of the Moon Landing Vehicle, foto
no. L 69-4361
(http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm)
|
The Moon Landing Vehicle on a
faked moon ground, foto no. L 67-3857
(http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm)
|
The following photos are showing astronauts in the 1960s
posing in front of the Moon Landing Vehicles under the
moon crane:
Astronaut
Neil Armstrong (middle) with the whole moon
crane crew in front of the Moon Landing
Vehicle, March 1967, foto no. L-67-1697.
(http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm)
Astronaut
Alan Shepard under the moon crane in front of
a Moon Landing Vehicle, Langley 30 March 1970,
foto no. EL-1996-00219.
|
|
Astronaut
Roger Chaffee tries to handle the Moon Landing
Vehicle.
|
|
But how these "Moon Landing Vehicles" can fly is never shown on a
foto. The centroid seems to be much too high even at
these vehicles and the vehicle would always incline.
The real Lunar Module with only one single engine, the
"Lunar Excursion Module" LEM, later called only "Lunar
Module" LM with it's two stages descent stage and ascent
stage has never flown according to the fact data because
here the centroid is even higher and the vehicle would
incline at once.
 |
The foto
shows the "Lunar Excursion Module" LEM, "Lunar
Module" LM with descent stage and ascent
stage from Apollo 11, landed perfectly by crane,
with black painted background. Foto no.
AS11-40-5927-600. It's relatively easy to paint
the background in black and to pretend a space
travel by this.
This big "Lunar Module" has never been tested in
a flight and also has never landed at any spot
because with only one main engine it's not
possible to keep the vehicle in a firm position.
The centroid is so high that the vehicle would
incline at once.
|
Wisnewski about the Lunar Module:
<If and how the Lunar Module would land on the moon
and how it would start again has - simply - never been
rehearsed.>
(orig.: "Ob und wie die Landefähre auf dem Mond würde
aufsetzen und wieder starten können, wurde ganz einfach
nicht erprobt." (Wisnewski, p.115)
But the Lunar Module always hang on a rope. The moon
crane was the warrant for a "clean moon landing". The
"Lunar Module" was: Wisnewski:
"absolutely softly landed on the 'lunar surface' "
(Wisnewski, p.283), and of course there is no landing
crater under the engine. The background is variated by
backdrops, the bottom is filled up with earth
(Wisnewski, p.284). The shadows in the artificial
craters are made specially black by spray to pretend a
harder light shadow effect "as if it would be on the
moon"
(Wisnewski, p.285).
[The rope and the crane will be manipulated black for
the "scenery" in "space"].
NASA expert Hansen indicates clearly in his book
"Spaceflight Revolution":
<To make the simulated landings more authentic, Hewes
and his men filled the base of the huge eight-legged,
red-and white structure with dirt and modeled it to
resemble the moon's surface. They erected floodlights at
the proper angles to simulate lunar light and installed
a black screen at the far end of the gantry to mimic the
airless lunar "sky." Hewes personally climbed into the
fake craters with cans of everyday black enamel to spray
them so that the astronauts could experience the shadows
that they would see during the actual moon landing.>
(In:
Hansen, James R.: Spaceflight Revolution, SP-4308,
S.375; Internet edition,
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm (August 2006);
Wisnewski, p.285).
An in the same way it's possible to use the moon crane
for the start from the moon, without engine flame of
course, but on a rope with a speed to 30 km/h.
(In:
Hansen, James R.: Spaceflight Revolution, SP-4308,
S.375; Internet edition,
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/contents.htm; Wisnewski,
p.285).
[The rope and the crane are painted black in the "moon
film" so there is the impression of a "space"].
The "sky crane helicopter"
One possibility which is not mentioned by Wisnewski to
make a scenery to "start from the moon" is the flight of
the Lunar Module on a sky crane helicopter lifting the
Module into the sky. Such a helicopter exists within the
"US" army since 1962.
Initial work on the Sikorsky heavy-lift 'sky-crane'
helicopter began in 1958. The first flight of the
turboshaft-powered S-64 "Skycrane" was May 9, 1962.
(http://www.showcasereplicas.com/helicopters.html)
The NASA has got the helicopter at Langley in the
"program", and it would be easy having a Lunar Module
hanging on the helicopter's rope.
Sky crane helicopter
|
Sky crane
helicopter "Sikorski" in front of Langley
Research Center, available since 1962, foto no.:
1972-L-01555 |
|
Helicopter on sky crane helicopter in the back
light. It's easy having installed a Lunar
Module, and the journalists do not realize the
trick...
The name "sky crane" gives a direct
indication to the moon crane...
|
There is also the
simulation of the starry sky with it's planets
(Wisnewski, p.292)
Simulations with a moon
model Lunar Orbit and Letdown Approach Simulator
(LOLA) at Langley
The huge moon model costs 1.9 Mio. $. Around the huge
moon ball is built a little railway to simulate moon
orbits (Wisnewski, p.286-287), with TV technique
(Wisnewski, p.288). foto no. L-65-5579 (Wisnewski,
p.287).
LOLA moon model with railway around, in the background
another artificial planet, foto of 1 Aug 1965,
foto no. L-65-5579.
(http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/contents.htm;
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm; (August 2006)
A problematic "Earth rise"
of 23 Aug 1966
The foto with the Earth rise taken by the so called
"moon satellite" "Lunar Orbiter 1" (official number
I-102H2, "I" for Lunar Orbiter 1) seem not "from the
moon" but the foto seems to be from simulation
installation LOLA according to the foto number of
NASA historian Hansen with the number L-66-6399.66, "L"
stands for Langley).
Hansen himself does not mention the contradiction. It
seems to be a faked foto - as so many, and the press
presents the foto as a real moon foto
(In: James R. Hansen: Spaceflight Revolution:
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/contents.htm;
Wisnewski,S.286, 288-289)
LOLA Earth rising from 23 Aug 1966, L-66-6399. The foto
registration "L" stands for the simulation center at
Langley. Also that a "Lunar satellite" "Lunar Orbiter 1"
can send a foto over 380,000 km to the Earth seams to be
very unrealistic when even a laser beam is 7 km large
over this distance...
[That's why all other moon fotos and planet fotos are
not sure. A neutral investigation about "space flight"
did not take place until now...]
And also accidents can be
simulated - the "control center" at Houston does not
know when the scenery is simulated
Accidents, fails and problems can be simulated at
Langley without exception (Wisnewski, p.275-276). All in
all more than 1,000 training problems are foreseen in
the simulation's program, e.g. the accident with an
explosion of an oxygen tank like it was with Apollo 13. And the
control center is absolutely manipulated:
Wisnewski:
"The simulator can simulate to the control center a real
command module, and this happens by transmitting of
measurement data from the command simulator to the
control center."
(orig.: "Der Simulator kann dem Kontrollzentrum eine
echte Kommandokapsel vorspielen, und zwar durch die
Übertragung von Messwerten aus der Simulatorkapsel in
das Kontrollzentrum.")
(In: Duncan, John: Reliability and Training;
www.apollosaturn.com/asnr/p239-244.htm; Wisnewski,
p.276)
In the control center the cables of the lying atmosphere
ships or of the simulators can be plugged in without the
control center itself knows what is going on (Wisnewski,
p.279).
Wisnewski:
<"Simulations were easy to perform. The instructors
hang off the extern stations of the Manned Space Flight
Network and gave in the according stream of data of
their ground simulation machinery... The controller at
Mission Control Center did not know where the data came
from and was not interested in either." This was
"purposely foreseen so the simulations did not differ
from the missions.">
(orig.: <"Simulationen waren einfach durchzuführen.
Die Instruktoren klemmten einfach die externen Stationen
des Manned-Space-flight-Netzwerks ab und speisten einen
entsprechenden Strom von Daten ein, der von ihrem
eigenen Bodenequipment erzeugt wurde... Die Controller
im Mission Control Center wussten weder, wo die Daten
herkamen, noch kümmerten sie sich darum." Dies war
'absichtlich so vorgesehen, damit sich Simulationen
nicht von echten Missionen unterscheiden liessen".>)
(In: www.clavius.org; Wisnewski, p.277)
The "control center" at Houston even does not know if
real flights or simulations are controlled (Wisnewski,
p.276). The other groups of the NASA project can never
distinguish if there is a simulation or not, and the
employees were not allowed to be interested in
(Wisnewski, p.279). The "controller" do not realize if
it is a simulation or not (Wisnewski, p.278).
[The "controller" are not "controllers" but extras in a
"moon play"].
99 % are simulations, and there is nothing special with
it. It could have been also 100 % simulations...
(Wisnewski, p.278).
[Blurred pictures of simulations could be the "moon
films", this is no problem to realize. So any film
producer can produce a "moon film"...]
Conclusion: The control center at Houston was no
"control center" but a rabbit in the "moon play"...
Blurred fotos from the
control center in TV
The "controller" make their jobs during Gemini and
Apollo program. The controllers are no more than
super-numeracies and shall not put stupid questions who
is composing the films in which way. The pictures of the
control center are absolutely no evidence for a "moon
landing", so, but more for a simulation. A controller
does not claim because he knows that he controls mostly
simulations only... (Wisnewski, p.278)
Add to this the pictures from the control center itself
in TV during the "moon landing" are very unsharp as the
pictures "from the moon" (Wisnewski, p.278-279). The
faces on the TV pictures are not visible. The probative
force of these pictures is 0 (Wisnewski, p.279).
[Every soccer game of that time is transmitted in
sharper pictures than the "moon landing" and the
"control center" during the "moon landing"...]
The employees of the NASA
program are silent
The little employees in the Apollo program have nothing
to say (Wisnewski, p.279-280). There is military
secrecy. There are secrecy paragraphs in the contracts,
and eventually also an oath, with heavy threat of
punishment when treachery happens (Wisnewski,
p.280).
Simulations: The waving
flag on the moon with a ventilator
|
Moon lie: Waving flag on the moon with
ventilator, little movie
|
 |
|
It is clear that
the flag "on the moon" has got a pole so it will not
drop. But the flag is waving all the time like in a
stiff wind. This seems to be a well functioning
ventilator (Wisnewski, p.285),
[as ventilators are used also for portrait fotos to
simulate wind in the hair].
The landing engine of the Lunar Module cannot have
caused the waving because with several 1,000°C hot gases
the flag had been melt at once to a clump. There would
be possible only a "cold stream" of the engine. But in
this case the Lunar Module would never had flown
(Wisnewski, p.286).
It really has never flown:
"If and how the Lunar Module would land on the moon and
start again simply had never been rehearsed."
(orig.: "Ob und wie die Landefähre auf dem Mond würde
aufsetzen und wieder starten können, wurde ganz einfach
nicht erprobt." (Wisnewski, p.115)
Simulations: Apollo 12
utters the possibility of the moon studio
|
Moon
lie Apollo 12: Astronaut Conrad unfolds the
flag "on the moon" and utters the
possibility that the Lunar Module could be
only a "model"...
|
The communication
of Apollo 12 ("on the moon" are the "moon astronauts"
Alan Bean and Pete Conrad) gives precise advice that the
whole "moon landing" is taking place in a hall.
Eventually the radio communication is from a simulation
by error (Wisnewski, p.273).
Conrad comes out of the shadow of the Lunar Module and
says:
"Hey man, this sun is bright. It seems to be as if
somebody had a lightspot in a hand..."
Conrad collects samples and says:
"I will tell you what ... you know, this sun ... it's
really as if somebody had turned on a super
spotlight..."
Conrad wonders about the missing landing crater:
"The landing engine - it's just the same as with Neil.
The engine has not produced a crater at all! [...] Look
at the lading engine - it has not produced even a hole!"
Conrad about the flag "on the Moon":
"This American flag looks fine, just aside
the Lunar Module, is it? It looks like a model."
(Wisnewski, p.273)
Wisnewski:
"If one looks through the many 100 s of pages of radio
transcript of Apollo 12 so one gets the feeling having
been at a volleyball game on Saturday afternoon and not
having been witness of heavy steps of the human beings
on a foreign and deadly orb."
(orig.: "Wenn man die vielen 100 Seiten der
Funkprotokolle von Apollo 12 durchblättert, dann bekommt
man auch das Gefühl, einem Volleyballspiel an einem
Samstagnachmittag zu lauschen und nicht den
beschwerlichen Schritten der Gattung Mensch auf einem
fremden und tödlichen Himmelskörper." (Wisnewski,
p.274).
At the end Houston said after 131 hours and 51
minutes mission time:
"This was the best simulation we ever had." And nobody
laughed... (Wisnewski, p.275)
[and nothing had been corrected].
Picture
sources
Maps
-- the NASA centers:
http://www.usc.edu/dept/engineering/TTC/NASA/links1.html
-- Langley Research Center: big map:
http://ludb.clui.org/tag/state:VA/
little map:
http://edition.cnn.com/2000/TECH/ptech/09/24/handheld.virus/map.virginia.fairfax.jpg
-- Houston Johnson Space Center (ex
Manned Spacecraft Center): big map:
http://www.clfc.org/venues/gilruth.htm;
little map:
http://edition.cnn.com/TECH/space/9811/08/astros.houston/texas.johnsonspace.map.lg.jpg
-- Kennedy Space Center:
http://www.eyeball-series.org/ksc-eyeball.htm
Simulation center at Houston (Manned Space
Center MSC)
-- Command Module Mission Simulator,
exterior view: http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4205/ch11-3.html
-- Command Module Mission Simulator,
interior view:
http://www.apolloexplorer.co.uk/photo/html/as16/default.htm;
http://www.apolloexplorer.co.uk/photo/html/as16/10075811.htm
Command Module Simulator,
CM-Simulator
-- exterior view with astronaut Jim
Lovell, 7.4.1970, foto no. 70-H-467:
http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/a13/images13.html;
http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/a13/ap13-70-H-467.jpg
--
interior view with astronauts:
http://www.apolloexplorer.co.uk/photo/html/AS10/default.htm;
http://www.apolloexplorer.co.uk/photo/html/AS10/10075101.htm
Lunar Module Simulator, LM Simulator
-- Lunar Module Simulator, exterior
view:
http://www.cradleofaviation.org/exhibits/space/lm_simulator/sim.html
-- Lunar Module Simulator, interior view
with Conrad and Bean:
http://perso.orange.fr/max.q/apollo/equipages/training.htm
Lunar Module Mission
Simulator, LMM Simulator
-- front side:
http://images.jsc.nasa.gov/luceneweb/caption_direct.jsp?photoId=S67-15795
-- inner side:
http://images.jsc.nasa.gov/luceneweb/caption_direct.jsp?photoId=S67-15794
Lunar Module Simulator at Houston Manned
Spacecraft Center building 5
-- exterior view:
http://www.apolloexplorer.co.uk/photo/html/apoll_ov/default.htm;
http://www.apolloexplorer.co.uk/photo/html/apoll_ov/10074712.htm
-- interior view:
http://www.apolloexplorer.co.uk/photo/html/apoll_ov/default.htm;
http://www.apolloexplorer.co.uk/photo/html/apoll_ov/10074713.htm
Rendezvous Simulator at Langley Research Center
(Virginia)
--
steering on the ground, foto no.: L-1962-06330:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_82.html
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/lunar-module.html;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001736.jpg
-- docking on the ground:
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/news/factsheets/Landmarks.html
-- docking chain black and white:
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/news/factsheets/Landmarks.html
-- docking
chain big foto in color visible foto composition:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_55.html;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001278.jpg
-- docking
procedure on ceiling:
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm
Moon crane and Lunar Landing Vehicles at
Langley Research Center (Virginia)
-- Langley Research Center, house front with moon
landing vehicle, foto no.: L-1963-09785:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_83.html;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001744.jpg
-- Lunar
Landing Vehicle with round cabin at the top for the moon
crane, foto no. L-1963-09781.:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/lunar-module.html;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001889.jpg
-- overhead crane
sight from above:
http://www.federalequipment.com/portfoliomil.html
--
overhead crane 2.7.1964 sight from the bottom up:
http://larc-exchange.larc.nasa.gov/lea/amateur-radio/;
http://larc-exchange.larc.nasa.gov/lea/amateur-radio/images/EL-2001-00424.jpe
-- moon
landing with the overhead crane 1967:
http://larc-exchange.larc.nasa.gov/lea/amateur-radio/;
http://larc-exchange.larc.nasa.gov/lea/amateur-radio/images/EL-1996-00001.jpe
--
Moon Landing Vehicle hanging on the overhead
crane:
http://larc-exchange.larc.nasa.gov/lea/amateur-radio/;
http://larc-exchange.larc.nasa.gov/lea/amateur-radio/images/EL-1996-00200.jpe
-- moon landing on the overhead crane
in several positions:
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm
-- moon landing on the overhead crane
on a faked lunar surface:
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm
Moon crane with astronaut
-- overhead crane with Neil Armstrong
with crew in front of Moon Landing Vehicle:
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm
-- overhead crane with Alan Shepard in
front of the Moon Landing Vehicle:
http://larc-exchange.larc.nasa.gov/lea/amateur-radio/;
http://larc-exchange.larc.nasa.gov/lea/amateur-radio/images/EL-1996-00219.jpe
-- overhead crane with Roger Chaffee
sitting in a Moon Landing Vehicle:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_55.html;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001280.jpg
Sky crane helicopter
Sikorsky
-- in front of Langley Research
Center, foto no.1972-L-01555:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_96.html;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001988.jpg
-- helicopter hanging on sky crane
helicopter:
http://www.popasmoke.com/visions/index.php?page=newview&cat1_id=3&cat2_id=13&cat3_id=245;http://www.popasmoke.com/visions/image.php?source=2526
Lunar Module of Apollo 11
http://www.space1.com/Artifacts/Lunar_Module_Artifacts/RCS_Plume_Deflector/rcs_plume_deflector.html
LOLA moon model
-- at Langley at Hampton (Virginia),
foto from 1.8.1965, foto no. L-65-5579:
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm
-- LOLA Earth rising of 23.8.1966,
L-66-6399: http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/contents.htm
Flag
-- Apollo 12: Astronaut Conrad
unfolding the flag:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001104.jpg;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/apollo12_1.html
^
