|
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5443:
Well, NASA claims now, this would be the sight on
the Command Service Module (CMS) after the undocking
procedure. According to NASA the "moon landscape"
would be 195 km under it and would be called "Mare
Fecunditatis" ("Sea of Fertility").
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5443.jpg
Photo compositions:
-- a "moon flight" is not possible because of high
radioactivity in space
-- the photo is a photo from the moon model and with
a composed, simple shadow
-- the flying object is not the landing "lunar
module", but this is the Command Service Module
which - according to the "moon landing scheme" -
should stay in the moon orbit. But the NASA
manipulators implanted the CMS as if it would land
on the moon. So, it seems that the NASA manipulators
have confused the Command Module with the Lunar
Module
-- the "moon surface" is brown or ocher / ochre, and
this does not at all correspond to the later "moon
photos" of the lunar surface where the surface is
white
-- the reader are further manipulated by NASA
romanticism by calling the moon plain a "Sea of
Fertility". By this the basic forces of life are
called and the whole world is driven into a moon
madness.
|
The planned "moon
landing" according to NASA and Wernher von Braun
(scheme)
The "moon
landing" according to Wernher von Braun, the
"father" of the "moon landing": The "Lunar Module"
should land, and the Command Module should stay in
the moon orbit with the Service Module performing
more orbits:
The "moon landing" with the detached
"Lunar Module", and the Command Module is
staying in the orbit with the Service
Module performing more orbits (scheme from
the book "Bemannte Raumfahrt" (Engl.
"Manned Space Flight" by Wernher von Braun
personally (1963)
|
So, the Command
Module with it's Service Module have to stay in a
horizontal position to perform their moon orbits,
and the "Lunar Module" should tip slowly by 90
degrees and fly to the moon. But NASA shows it to
the contrary:
|
|
|
|
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5444:
NASA claims that this would be one more sequence of
the Command Module over the "moon"
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5444.jpg
Photo composition:
-- a "moon flight" is not possible because of high
radioactivity in space
-- the photo is a photo from the moon model and with
a composed, simple shadow
-- the craters become bigger, and this is the proof
that here should be shown a "moon landing" with the
Command Module with its Service Module. But there
should land a "Lunar Module", and not a Command
Module. The NASA manipulators confused the "Lunar
Module" with the Command Service Module (CMS).
Another alternative would be that the Command Module
with it's Service Module would have flown in fact in
a right angle over the "moon" and under it had
undocked the "Lunar Module". But this would
contradict to the scheme of the moon landing planner
Wernher von Braun which projects moon orbits in a
horizontal position. At the same tame has to be put
the question how the photo should have been made
"from above" when the Lunar Module had undocked under
it.So also this alternative is not possible. So the
only possibility is a wrong photo composition. It
seems that the NASA manipulators had their head more
at drinking champaign than at their manipulation
work...
|
|
|
The moon model LOLA
In Langley
(directly aside the head quarters of "American"
secret service CIA) there was a big planetarium.
There could be simulated "moon orbits" on a little
railway, and by this there could be "filmed" moon
orbits, and the public did not notice the fraud:
LOLA moon model with railway around, in the
background another artificial planet; photo from 1
August 1965, photo no. L-65-5579. Photos with an
"L" signature are from the simulation plant of
Langley.
(In: James R.
Hansen: Spaceflight Revolution:
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/contents.htm;
Wisnewski: Lügen im Weltraum (Engl: Lies in
Space"); Knaur Edition 2005, p.286, 288-289)
Well, with this moon model, with a good "photo
studio" and with good photo composers it was
possible to produce a lot of "moon photos" and to
pretend many "moon orbits". But the NASA
manipulators of Apollo 11 also made the big
mistakes to let down the Command Module to the
moon instead the "Lunar Module". The wrong photos
are going on:
|
|
|
|
Apollo 11, photo
no. AS11-37-5445: NASA claims that this would be
the Command Module "Columbia" after the undocking
procedure over the crater Taruntius K, Taruntius
P, and over "Dorsum Cayeux" (Cayeux ridge) in the
Northern part of the "Mare Fecunditatis" ("Sea of
Fertility").
NASA even claims to know the moon coordinates, and
again the crater is called with personalities of
the Western culture, for example a crater
"Taruntius", a philosopher, mathematician and
astrologer of the Roman Empire, another crater is
called Anvil, and a ridge is called "Dorsum
Cayeux" (Latin "dorsum" for "back", Cayeux is a
French holiday resort with a casino at the French
Atlantic coast).
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5445.jpg
Photo composition:
-- a "moon flight" is not possible because of high
radioactivity in space
-- the photo is a picture of the moon model and
the shadow is implanted, and a minimized photo of
the "Command Module" from the training or from a
transport
-- so here is landing on the wrong part of the
lunar rocket, the Command Module with it's Service
Module instead of the "Lunar Module"
-- at the same the readers feel culturally formed
when they know the crater's names with their
meanings.
|
It's perverse that NASA
is linking "moon landing" with history, cultural
history and geography of the Western culture. The
moon landing fake is linked with "education" to make
it "interesting" for the upper class. But it's even
more perverse how stupid the journalists are which
don't want to notice this big mistakes of NASA that
here a Command Module was landing instead of a
"Lunar Module".
|
|
|
|
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5446:
NASA claims that this would be one more sequence of
the Command Module over the "moon"
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5446.jpg
Photo composition:
-- the scene is going on with the wrong part of the
moon rocket landing on the moon, the Command Module
with it's Service Module instead of the "Lunar
Module"
-- add to this it's impossible to make photos from
moving objects in long sequences in the same
position, here of a vertical falling object.
|
|
|
|
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5447:
NASA claims now the Command Module would be over the
"Sea of Tranquility". NASA claims that the landing
site of Apollo 11 would be in the center/centre of
the photo, in the upper left part would be crater
Moltke and the Hypatia Rille, right would be crater
Collins, crater Aldrin should be in the upper part
right, and crater Sabine E, D and B would be renamed
later after the "astronauts" Armstrong, Aldrin and
Collins.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5447.jpg
Photo composition:
-- this is again the moon model
-- the photo shows once again a landing Command
Module instead of a landing "Lunar Module".
|
|
|
|
Apollo 11, photo no. AS11-37-5448:
NASA claims that the Command Module is near crater
Schmidt with its sharp shape. The part of the crater
at the lower margin right in the corner should be
the Western part of crater Sabine, and the partly
visible margin of the crater of the right margin
would be from crater Ritter. This should be the last
photo of the "Lunar Module" (LM) before the landing
approach. The "moon landing" would have been then
eventually one "moon orbit" later.
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/images11.html
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-37-5448.jpg
Suddenly there should be a "Lunar Module" now
whereas there was always a Command Module before. At
the same time the moon lie cannot be stopped because
the stupid journalists have to follow their chief
editors which are steered by CIA. CIA is NASA
itself.
|
