8c. Invented sea battles against
Jesus Fantasy Byzantium
[Islamic lie tradition: naval battles against Jesus
Fantasy Byzantium]
The [[Muhammad Fantasy]] Muslims were in fulfillment
of a [[Fake Fantasy]] prophecy of the [[Fake Fantasy]]
Prophet under the [[Fantasy?]] caliph Umar ibn
al-Chattab (vulgo: the drawn sword of [[a Fantasy]]
God) also as a naval power and thus met in Islamic
representation "the lifeblood of [[Jesus Fantasy]]
Byzantium". In the [[Fake Fantasy]] Battle of Phoinix,
also known as the [[Fake Fantasy]] "war of the masts",
they won a glorious [[Fake Fantasy]] victory. After
that, the [[Jesus Fantasy]] Byzantines would have
acted very clumsily, because they were in too close
formation and therefore gave the [[Fake Fantasy]]
Muslims opportunity, jumping from boat to boat, to
turn the [[Fake Fantasy]] naval battle into a [[Fake
Fantasy]] land battle. Although the [[Fake Fantasy]]
Muslim fleet consisted of [[Jesus Fantasy]]
Christians, they had enthusiastically and willingly
rendered their service to the [[Muhammad Fantasy]]
Muslims. The [[Fake Fantasy]] fleet had then failed
against [[Jesus Fantasy]] Byzantium with it's "Greek
fire", however, the [[Jesus Fantasy]] emperor had
become a tribute to the [[Muhammad Fantasy]] Muslims.
As a reminder of reality: just the opposite is the
case. Muawiya / Maavia became tributary and
discontinued because of the failure. His successor
Malik also continued payments to [[Jesus Fantasy]]
Byzantium, as we know. Incidentally, the author of
this incident is Tabari, a well-known fairytale uncle,
who wrote this about 900 [p.151], about 200 years
after the alleged events [74].
[74] It looks like we have to say goodbye
to our favorite fairytale uncle Tabari. The most
recent analyzes have shown that the Tabari texts we
have are from the 12th or 13th century from Cairo.
Future research may reveal that "Tabari" was not a
person, but the generic term for a collection of
texts of various origins and authors.
[Another fictional caliph: Umar ibn al-Chattab]
It's almost superfluous to mention that there are no
historical proofs for good [[Fake Fantasy]] Umar ibn
al-Chattab, and as many of his colleagues never
existed [75].
[75] Nevertheless, there is a dissertation
on his almost superhuman achievements at the Faculty
of Philosophy at Cologne (Germany): from Halte
Uenal: The justification of the legal judgments of
the second caliph 'Umar Ibn Al-Hattab'; Cologne 1982
(original German: Die Rechtfertigung der
juristischen Urteile des zweiten Kalifen 'Umar Ibn
Al-Hattab')
Not one of these numerous "decisive battles" of [[Fake
Fantasy]] Muslims is historically proven.
[Research 650-850: There were battles between the
rulers of Byzantium and Persia - Muhammad Fantasy
Muslims are not mentioned anywhere]
Of course, change of power or change of privileges in
territories cannot have been without fights. Many
sources report about these times about numerous
skirmishes - without precise indications of the
affected. There are position fights between the former
Persian and [[Jesus Fantasy]] Byzantine paarts,
between emirs who became independent and old rulers.
But there is no report about [[Muhammad Fantasy]]
Muslims.
After 627, after the final defeat of [[Persian ruler]]
Khosrau II at Nineveh against [[Jesus Fantasy
Byzantine]] Heraclius, there was no Persian power left
to destroy the [[Muhammad Fantasy]] Muslims on their
conquest to China, and Heraclius himself was at the
height of his military might.
[Islamic lie tradition: poets between 800 and 922
invent 200 years of early Muhammad Fantasy Islam
"history"]
The big problem here, as in all of Islamic prehistory,
are the sources. They are invariably [[Fake Fantasy]]
Islamic sources, and they are written in a later time
without exception. All these well-known authors
[[inventors]] [76],
[76] "Annales" of Tabari (died 922), the
hadith collection of Buhari (died 870), the "History
of the Wars" by Al Wakidi (died 822), "Generations"
by Ibn Saad (d. 845)
which are cited again and again, were written in much
later with all details and [[invented]] quotations -
and all is written on the base of sources without any
proof. These stories are about [[Fake Fantasy]] events
("decisive battles") or [[Fake Fantasy]] persons
("caliphs") that can not be proven. None of the dates
are correct because they refer to [p.152] legends and
because the retrospective reinterpretation into the
lunar calendar is a frequently proven source of error.
All what these authors [[poets!]] are offering of
sources are the well-known "guarantors" in the
tradition of a chain of oral narratives.
[Islamic lie tradition: Muhammad Fantasy Islam
should move in "extra-historical dimensions"]
From the first two centuries, the time of [[Fake
Fantasy]] Muhammad and the [[Fake Fantasy]] conquests,
not even Islamic sources exist. Anyone who considers
subsequent stories without proven sources as history
agrees with Sayyid Qutb [77],
[77] Islamic theorist, Egypt
1906-1966. More in the chapter "Who did this to us!"
who claimed that history does not take place for
[[Muhammad Fantasy]] Islam because it moves in
"extraterrestrial dimensions". How flexibly one deals
with historical facts in the Islamic perspective, can
prove the following quote:
"But even the actual historical events,
the presentation of events and their explanation,
will be different, depending on whether the
historian [[poet!]] admits an immediate, divine
action in his imagination or not." [78]
[78] Mohammed Laabdallaoui on: muhamad.islam.de,
2009 [[Muhammad - Islam.de - The Prophet's Website
(original German: Die Internetseite des Propheten)]]
And:
"In the Muslim tradition, the direction
has been taken that tries to solve this problem not
by a dogmatic exclusion of all miracles, but by
strict standards of credibility of the reporting."
In other words, miracles in historiography are
allowed. Does the quoted gentleman speak of historians
or "fairy tale tellers," the oriental storytellers? Of
course, the thinking believers realize that the events
are logically impossible. Therefore, there is no
choice but to postulate the existence of miracles or,
at the same time, to reclaim the inapplicability of
historical processes for [[Muhammad Fantasy]] Islam.
Perhaps one should retain the Western bad habit in
restricting research and historiography to facts and
verifiable facts [p.153].
[Research: Arab Jesus Fantasy Christians have left
a rich literature]
At the same time, however, the [[Jesus Fantasy]]
Christians of the same time not only left a wealth of
literature, but even developed a far-reaching
missionary activity. Considering the passionate
arguments between them, the topics that heated their
minds and found a rich literary record. Topics that
were highly academic and are absolutely secondary
compared to the confrontation and threat in a
different dimension by another religion.
[Islamic lie tradition: Muhammad Fantasy Islam has
occupied the states like an avalanche from Spain to
China - in Jesus Fantasy Christian sources NOTHING
OF THIS CAN BE FOUND (!!!)]
As described in the traditional report, [[Muhammad
Fantasy]] Islam has moved like a whirlwind through
half of the world at the time. Why are the main
sufferers, the [[Jesus Fantasy]] Christians and the
many members of other religions, saying nothing to
them? Because they welcomed the [[Muhammad Fantasy]]
Muslims as liberators? Because the liberators were as
tolerant as tradition wants us to believe?
There are now attempts to prove these events with
non-Islamic sources. Normally the following names are
mentioned: Sophronius, Maximus the Confessor, Thomas
the Presbyter, Sebeos of Armenia, John of Damascus,
and a few others. When the texts can be assigned to
the different authors for sure, a clear picture comes
out [79].
[79] Karl-Heinz Ohlig: Indications for a
new religion in [[Jesus Fantasy]] Christian
literature, 'under [[Muhammad Fantasy]] Islamic
rule' ?; In: Early Islam; Berlin 2007
(original German: Karl-Heinz Ohlig:
Hinweise auf eine neue Religion in der christlichen
Literatur, 'unter islamischer Herrschaft'?; In: Der
frühe Islam; Berlin 2007)
[Research: "Arab" population with Christian Jesus
Fantasy beliefs: Christian-Arabic literature does
not mention any Muhammad, any Quran or any Islam -
and the tactics of interpretation "Taquiyya"]
Much is said about "Saracens, Ismailites, Hagarites",
these words were common synonyms for "Arabs". These
are perceived as "heretics", but in no case as members
of another religion, and not at all with a [[Muhammad
Fantasy]] Islam. This religious denomination does not
exist in the described period. Heretics are deviants
of their own religion - and precisely this were the
Arab [[Jesus Fantasy]] Christians of the 7th to 9th
centuries, and even later probably to a lesser extent.
At the end of the 7th century, the Syrian Mr. Johannes
bar Penkaye writes in his 15-volume book Ktaba d-res
melle: "Among the Arabs, there are not a few [[Jesus
Fantasy]] Christians, some of whom belong to the
heretics, some belong to us." He does not talk about a
[[Fantasy Fake]] Muhamad or [[Muhammad Fantasy]]
Islam. Anastasius of the Sinai (610-701), Jacob of
Edessa (633-708), or the Patriarch Isojahb III. (died
659) write about the problems of their time - here too
no mention of the [[Fake Fantasy]] Prophet [p.154] and
his religion. A conversation between the patriarch
John and an Emir from the year 644 points in the same
direction, this was short time after the takeover of
power by Maavia [80].
[80] F. Nau: A conference of patriarch
Jean with the Emir of Agareens; In: Journal
Asiatique, 1915
(original French: Un colloque de Patriarche Jean
avec l'émir des Agareens; In: Journal Asiatique,
1915)
What is being discussed? There are administrative
questions and there are the differencies of the
individual beliefs, so about [[Fake Fantasy]] Abraham,
[[Fake Fantasy]] Moses and [[Fake Fantasy]] Mary - and
of course about the [[Fake Fantasy]] nature of [[Fake
Fantasy]] Jesus. The Emir could have been Ibn As or
Ibn Saad. Considering [[the poets]] Nevo and Koren
[81]
[81] [[see]: Yehuda D. Nevo / Judith
Koren: Crossroads to Islam; New York 2003
"The Emir is certainly not a [[Muhammad Fantasy]]
Muslim. He shows no knowledge or followers, he never
mentions [[any Fake Fantasy]] Muhammad, [[Fake
Fantasy]] Koran or [[Fake Fantasy]] Islam."
For such cases, however, the Islamic invention is
using the "Taqiyya" argument: "Taquiyya" is an in the
[[Muhammad Fantasy]] Quran [82]
[82] [[see]]: Amongst others, [[Fantasy]]
Sura 3: 28-29
sanctioned religious manipulation to save oneself from
an emergency or to take advantage of the alleged
friendship with an unbeliever. That means, the emir
had only simulated to be a [[Muhammad Fantasy]] Muslim
for tactical reasons.
The very sober analysis of numbers alone should be
sufficient [83].
[83] [[see]]: Waldmann's "Clausewitz
argument" (original German: "Clausewitz-Argument")
[Research: The big Muhammad Fantasy Muslim armies
were IMPOSSIBLE - and the "miracles" in the Muhammad
Fantasy Muslim war poetry]
Where should the armies come from in a desert with
only little population? Alone Egypt and Mesopotamia
had millions of inhabitants, just having a stick in
the hand had been enough as a defense. Tradition knows
that, too, and provides the explanation with the story
of the naked [[Fake Fantasy]] Muslim, armed only with
a reed, who suddenly faced a heavily armed Persian
horseman. The latter got afraid turning his horse
hiding his arrows under his clothes so others would
mean as he had none any more. Alone between 639 and
641 (contradictory information aside) there is said
[[Islam Fantasy says!]] that there were conquered
-- Syria
-- Mesopotamia,
-- Persia,
-- Egypt.
And all this at the same time, and including several
fortresses, and siege engines and a lot of time was
needed for this.
There is no need to study Clausewitz for understanding
that the whole conquest complex is a complete nonsens
controlling this by calculating [p.155]. Therefore
[[Fake Fantasy]] Islamic tradition presents officially
these wonders trying to install all this as a
legitimate instrument of historiography.
[Research: The sources of Byzantium and Persia
mention neither a Fake Fantasy Mohammed, nor a Fake
Fantasy Islam, nor a Fake Fantasy Quran]
And imagine, the obsessive religious [[Jesus Fantasy]]
Byzantium is quickly reduced by half of it's empire by
desert warriors in the name of a new [[Fake]]
religion. The Persians lose their entire dominion. And
they don't notice it? Both have a sophisticated,
bureaucratic apparatus, both are busy loggers. And
they do not report this? Millions of [[Jesus Fantasy]]
Christians, pagans, [[Jesus Fantasy]] Zoroastrians,
Buddhists from the Nile to the Indus and the Volga are
unaware that they have been overwhelmed by a new
[[Fake]] religion? [[Jesus Fantasy]] Monks, [[Jesus
Fantasy]] priests, [[Jesus Fantasy]] bishops, highly
intellectual theologians, well traveled personalities
- they should not have been able to recognize a new
[[Fake]] religion? Or have been too cowardly to act
against it? Most of them would have happily died for
their [[Jesus Fantasy]] faith! In these times of high
religious awareness and rich literature, nothing
should have been reported in a very short time by the
massive and militant appearance of a new religion and
its total victory?
That's a completely absurd imagination, all this. The
only possible explanation is that the events depicted
in the traditional account never took place. One can
not consider the [[Fake Fantasy]]Islamic reports as
historiography without doing anyone wrong. They are
stories, fairy tales from the East. The ghostly thing
is that they have essentially also shaped the history
of the Western public. Is there even a new miracle to
report?
The [[Fake Fantasy]] "golden years" of [[Muhammad
Fantasy]] Islamic conquest - they never existed. But
there have been the golden years of Arab
self-determination, the split from the two mighty
power blocs of the region that laid the foundation for
an Arab empire and Arab consciousness. Only later was
this specific Arab success story reinterpreted into an
Islamic story.
