Kontakt     Hauptseite     zurück
      <<         >>index
D     ESP

Jewry: Fake and truth in the Old Testament (OT) according to documents and excavations

New identity by new Jewish history by help of chronology and archaeological research

43. Appendix: partition of the 5 books of Moses in the versions of J, E, D, P, and R

by Michael Palomino (2006 / 2010)

Share:

Facebook







from: Israel Finkelstein / Neil A. Silberman: The Bible unearthed. Archeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts; The Free Press, a division of Simon & Schuster, Inc., 2001; German edition has got the title "No trombones before Jericho" (orig. German: "Keine Posaunen vor Jericho"): edition C.H.Beck oHG, Munich 2002;

Here in this analysis is used the German version "Keine Posaunen vor Jericho" of DTV, Munich 2004, second edition of 2005. All page indications refer to the German version. I hope the page numbers are not very different.


The variations of the books of Moses and the writers

Terminology and the geographical hot spots are not the same in the different books. The versions are written in different epochs and in different locations. One can detect the authors by the geographic terminology and by the function that have the tribes in the text (p.23).

Texts of "J" with JHWH from Jerusalem
This version (depiction of the tribe of Judah) is using God consequently as a Tetragrammaton of JHWH (according the scholars pronounced "Yahweh"). The analysts of the 19th century name these texts as texts of "J" (p.23).

The Yahwists in Jerusalem describe the perspective of the southern Reich of Judah, probably in the times of the faked king of Solomon (970-930 B.C.) or a short time after (p.23).

The version of "J" of the patriarchs above all is a literary trial of a definition of a unified people of Israel and is not an exact report (p.58).

The texts of "E" with Elohim
Another chain of stories is using God with the name of Elohim of El, above all the description of the tribes in the North, above all Ephraim, Manasseh and Benjamin. The analysts of the 19th century name these texts as texts of "E" (p.23).

The texts of the Elohists in the North are describing the events of the time of the independence from 930 to 720 B.C. (p.23).

The texts of "D" of the Deuteronomy, the 5th book of Moses
The 5th book of Moses ("Deuteronomy") seems to be in a significant style ans seems to be an independent document (p.23).

The texts of "P" of the priests
The rest of the texts are descriptions of rites by the priests (name "P") as "Priestly Sources", about cults, about prescriptions of purity and sacrifices (p.23-24). This source of the priests "P" is dated for the time after the exile - that mean the majority of the scholars - and also the definite edition of the Pentateuch is developed after the exile (p.58).

The "Deuteronomistic History"

Common features of Deuteronomy, books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings
The analysts state the the books of Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings are in the same linguistic and theological style. Some times they are redacted. Since the 1940s the analysts are naming these books as "Deuteronomistic History". The analysts have not the same meaning about the point of time when the books were written, during the deportation to Babylon or during the time of king Josiah finished in the exile locations (p.25).

According to Finkelstein / Silberman the Deuteronomistic History is composed under the king Josiah (p.26). According to Finkelstein / Silberman the Deuteronomistic History was written by one single historian (p.185) [whereas there are prophecies for centuries building a frame considering that God is "right"].

Josiah in the Deuteronomistic History: The degradation of the Omrid Reich

Degrading the Omrid Reich Josiah wants to support his political ambitions and religious reforms (p.26). Josiah as a king of Jerusalem means that he had to degrade the kingdom of the Omrids blaming "sinful behavior". Instead of a description of the kingdom of the Omrids Josiah is presenting a faked big Reich under David and Solomon which is said having been a pure Israeli affair.

There are more faked elements:

-- the siege of Samaria is stressed

-- king Ahab is degraded with the claim he had not murdered his enemy

-- the palaces in Amaria and Jezreel are said having been elements of idolatry and injustice

-- Josiah simply does not want a successful northern kingdom because Jerusalem was only a country side (p.214).

With faked stories about the kings Omri, Ahab and Jezebel the true history of Israel is systematically concealed and Jerusalem is put into the center (p.215).

The texts of "R": There are phrases between the texts and explanations
The Pentateuch is a composed thing, revised and composed by the editors in a wanted manner whereas alto the editors have given some "traces" in the books which are classified as texts of "R":
-- phrases between the texts
-- explanations of the editors (p.24).

<<         >>indexnächstes Kapitel





^