An empire without any findings - an empire never mentioned in the records of the neighbors - such an empire did not exist
News
presented by Michael Palomino (2014)
Share:
Michael Palomino, logic analytic historiography since 1992
Biblical archeology and documents: David and Salomo cannot be found - correct Torah and Bible!
by Michael Palomino 2011; from the book by Finkelstein / Silberman: The Bible Unearthed
========
Archaeological research could hardly find any proof about king David and not anything about king Salomo. Findings which were ordered to David and Salomo before had to be reordered on new chronological base of research and had to be ordered to kings who were partly underexposed until today. Additionally new events have to be added which are missing in the Bible books.
In the meantime the documents in Egypt and in Mesopotamia can all be read and a complete comparison of the events is possible also with the Bible texts.
Thus the Jewish and Christian institutions are confronted with Biblical archeology and documents with a complete reordering of the events and faults in the Old Testament can be found and corrected easily and precisely. But just Jewish and Christian institutions are not going with the new research but are holding on with their old fashioned texts instead of revise them according to the new history research integrating also the new facts in their preaching and sermons.
Thus Jewry and Christendom are always more and more old fashioned spreading their lies. This should be stopped!
Book by Christa Pöppelmann: 111 times wisdom: early high civilizations (original in German: 111 mal Wissen: Frühe Hochkulturen); Edition Compact Via 2011; ISBN: 978-3-8174-8356-3; www.compact-via.de; p.93 [1]
Purchase the book at Amazon: http://www.amazon.de/Hochkulturen-wichtigsten-Personen-Ereignisse-vergangener/dp/3817483562
The empire of "King David" without findings and never mentioned in the records of the neighbors
<In the Bible the king of Israel is a hero. But in other historical records he is never coming up.>
David should have been the second king of Israel - around 1,000 BC - and the source is only one book, the "Old Testament" which is also called Torah (chapters Richter, Samuel, Kings).
At the end Mrs. Christa Pöppelmann comes to the conclusion that the invention of this empire of "King David" was creating "identity". She is making the following summary:
Quotation (translated): The claims of the "Bible" with Saul, David and Salomo (Old Testament, Torah)
<Bible is reporting that during a long time Israelites were organized in 12 loose tribal associations being lead by so called "judges". But there were fights and the pressure was always higher thus against the Philistines they took the resolution having a common king. This Saul is reported having governed from 1010 BC on, but at the end he is reported having lost the battle against the Philistines. Then King David was following, allegedly the son-in-law who had partly made a coalition with the Philistines against Saul, but later he was conquering them, and he was also conquering the other Canaanite populations like Edomites, Moabites, Ammonites and Jebusites, and it is reported that he was converting the capital of the Jebusites "Jerusalem" for being his own capital. Then his son Salomo was following who had an infinite wisdom and who was accumulating a great wealth becoming legendary by this.>
Quotation (translated): The reality shows: no findings - neighboring records never mention such an empire - trade contacts match more to the 8th century BC
<Neither David nor Saul nor Salomo are appearing in any other source but the Bible. There is also no archaeological evidence for any significant empire of Israel in the 10th century BC. Therefore the historians assume that this empire was rather not important or has been created later. Some searchers mean that the reports about Salomo and his trade contacts for example with the king of Tyros and with the queen of Saba are matching more to the 8th century BC than to the 10th century BC.
All in all the myth of David was creating identity to the population of the Israelites. Also in Christendom Jesus is considered a descendant of David.>
Comment: Other Jewish empires are hidden in the Bible until today!
Well, Jewry had other empires which would also "create identity" but which unfortunately are not mentioned in the Old Testament until today because the religious leaders (Pope and chief rabbis) are not ready until today (2014) to correct the "holy books". But this would be done since a long time already in collaboration with Jewish archeologies who found out all new data (like Finkelstein and Silverman in the book: Bible Unearthed).
Michael Palomino, April 26, 2014
Original German text:
<In der Bibel ist der König Israels ein Held. Doch in anderen zeitgenössischen Quellen taucht er nicht auf.>
<Die Bibel berichtet, dass die Israeliten lange Zeit in zwölf losen Stammesverbänden organisiert waren, die von sogenannten "Richtern" geführt wurden. Aber unter dem Druck der Kämpfe gegen die Philister beschlossen sie, einen gemeinsamen König einzusetzen. Dieser Saul soll um 1010 v.Chr. regiert haben, aber letztendlich den Philistern unterlegen gewesen sein. Auf ihn folgte König David, angeblich sein Schwiegersohn, der sich teilweise mit den Philistern gegen Saul verbündet hatte, sie aber später besiegte und auch die anderen kanaanitischen Völker wie Edomiter, Moabiter, Ammoniter und Jebusiter unterwarf und die Jebusiterstadt Jerusalem zu seiner Hauptstadt machte. Ihm folgte dann sein Sohn Salomo, der durch seine unendliche Weisheit und seinen grossen Reichtum legendär wurde.>
<Weder David noch Saul noch Salomo tauchen in irgendeiner ausserbiblischen Quelle auf. Auch archäologisch gibt es keine Beweise für ein bedeutendes Reich Israel im 10. Jahrhundert v.Chr. Deshalb gehen die Historiker davon aus, dass dieses Reich entweder vergleichsweise unbedeutend war oder vielleicht sogar erst später entstand. Gerade einige Berichte über Salomo und seine Handelskontakte, beispielsweise mit dem König von Tyros und der Königin von Saba, passen nach Meinung mancher Forscher eher in das 8. als in das 10. Jahrhundert v.Chr.
Für das Volk der Israeliten aber war der Mythos David identitätsstiftend. Auch im Christentum gilt Jesus als Nachkomme Davids.>
[1] Book by Christa Pöppelmann: 111 times wisdom: early high civilizations (original in German: 111 mal Wissen: Frühe Hochkulturen):^
http://www.amazon.de/Hochkulturen-wichtigsten-Personen-Ereignisse-vergangener/dp/3817483562
