Film by Dylan Avery: "Loose Change 2 - Louder than words"
English version: http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&hl=de&emb=1#
German version: http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-6487589132427993552&hl=de&emb=1#
English version with German subtitles: http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=-7859909765349743827&q=loose+change+2
in cooperation with Mercury Media International; Executive Producer: Korey Rowe.
Participants Rowe and Bermas.
in cooperation with Mercury Media International; executive producer: Korey Rowe.
Producer: Dylan Avery
It began with a project of an "Operation Northwoods" 1962
Lemnitzer, supreme General of the "USA", portrait of about 1963. Lemnitzer wants to pretend a Cuban attack against "USA" so an occupation of the island would be possible.
Plan for an "Operation Northwoods" against Cuba without
[In the 1960s already members of Kennedy government of the "USA" are that criminal that they have the idea let pass an aircraft without passengers and let it explode, and then should be said that communists had destroyed an airplane with passengers which is kidnapped by the "US" government. That's the beginning of playing with aircraft maneuvers in the "USA"]:
There shall be an airplane hijacked with "American" students, then an unmanned, remote control steered airplane in the same color shall be blasted over Cuba and by propaganda Cuba shall be blamed for the dead "American" students which in reality will not be dead. This shall be the reason for an occupation of Cuba. The plan is rejected by the governments, but the plan is not deleted from the CIA project list. Since 1964 CIA is waiting for an occasion to fulfill the plan to make terror to the World by an exchange of airplanes and by blaming somebody who is not the culprit.
Operation Northwoods, there is the project with Lemnitzer's signature. McNamara refused the plan absolutely, and Kennedy removed Lemnitzer.
[The idea to steer aircrafs without persons by remote control is shifted from the Ministry of Defense to NASA, and NASA can present some results in the 1980s]:
1 December 1984
Experiments with remote control in Boeing airplanes
A Boeing 720 is steered by remote control for 16 hours and 22 seconds.
1.12.1984: Experiments of the NASA with remote control of Boeings
Boeing with remote control, experiment in 1984, liftoff
The dummies (puppets) in the remote controlled Boeing are supervised with an inner camera.
The remote controlled Boeing in the NASA experiment of 1984 shortly before the crash.
The remote controlled Boeing in the NASA experiment of 1984: There comes an obstacle against a wing.
The obstacle provokes a fire in the wing.
The dummies in the crashing Boeing move back and forth in their seats, smoke is intruding.
[In a perverse kind of behavior "US" government boards (Reagan times) are developing scenarios how it would be possible to attack government buildings and blaming others with this event]:
First version of the Pentagon scenario
The scenario says the Pentagon would be hit by a Boeing. Pilot Charles Burlingame is a member of the exercise, an ex navy pilot. Then he is working with American Airlines.
Charles Burlingame, portrait
[It seems: Since the first Iraq war in 1991 under President Bush Senior the Nazi racist Republicans always want another second war, a big war to occupy Iraq completely. It seems that under the Clinton government there are more perverse ideas how the own state buildings could be attacked and then blamed other people. In 1993 there is a bomb attack on the WTC. Now also in the ministries of the "USA" is spread terrorism, and now there is a project to destroy the WTC - and blaming "terrorists" for that]:
A FEMA study "Emergency Response to Terrorism" is showing the WTC in cross hairs
FEMA study 1997 "Emergency Response to Terrorism" about possible terror attacks against the WTC.
The title page of the FEMA study of 1997 shows the WTC in cross hairs.
Experiments with remote control steered drones
NASA develops a drone "Global Hawk" which can fly as high as passenger airliners and is steered by remote control, flying to 32.000 foot. Maiden flight was on Edwards Air Force Base (Edwards AFB) on 28 February 1998.
Drone "Global Hawk", maiden flight on 28th February 1998
Drone "Global Hawk", maiden flight on 28th February 1998.
The North American Defense NORAD begins with exercises how hijacked airplanes could be crashed into WTC and Pentagon.
NORAD exercises since 1999 with air planes against WTC and against the Pentagon.
"Handbook" of the Ministry of Justice "Managing Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents - An Executive Level Program for Sheriffs"
Ministry of Justice publishes a handbook about terrorism ("Managing Weapons of Mass Destruction incidents. An Executive Level Program for Sheriffs") with the title page with the WTC in cross hairs.
Terrorism handbook of the "US" Ministry of Justice: The title page shows the WTC in cross hairs.
The neo conservative "project" for a "New American Century": "Rebuilding America's Defenses"
Cheney, Rumsfeld, Bush and Paul Wolfowitz create a booklet "Rebuilding America's Defense. Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century".
Rebuilding America's Defenses, title page 2000
The study "Rebuilding America's Defenses" maintains that there is needed another Pearl Harbor to create a situation so "America" can start with new conquests:
<Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor.>
[The connections seem to be like this: In this "project" is said that the "States" have to occupy all territories with oil so all oil would be in "US" hands. This is the final reason to prepare another Iraq war, and there is a second "Pearl Harbor" needed: There is a catastrophe needed to give the "USA" the permission to occupy Iraq]:
<Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor.>
24 October 2000
Second version of the pentagon scenarios
under leadership by MASCAL, with simulation of a Boeing 757 crashing into the Pentagon.
Pentagon simulation exercise MASCAL with a Boeing 757 against the Pentagon, 24 October 2000
NORAD plans new Pentagon exercises
how a Boeing will crash into the Pentagon. The plan is rejected as not realistic.
Article: "Pentagon crash 'too unrealistic' "
A NORAD plan for an exercise how a Boeing crashes into the Pentagon is rejected as not realistic.
New service regulations of the Ministry of Defense for hijacked airplanes
In case of hijacked airplanes, all not immediate measures have to be coordinated with the Ministry of Defense.
since July 2001
Ashcroft does not take official airplanes for his flights any more
because of an analysis of the FBI.
Article: "Ashcroft Flying High"
"US" minister of justice does not take official airplanes any more because of an analysis of the FBI.
4 July 2001
Osama bin Laden gets medical treatment in an "US" hospital
Article: "CIA agent alleged to have met Bin Laden in July"
The regional CIA boss of Dubai visits bin Laden in the "US" hospital in Dubai.
24 July 2001
Silverstein "buys" the WTC
Silverstein is leasing the whole WTC site for 99 years for a price of 3,2 bn. $. Included is an insurance paragraph for the case of terror attacks with a loss amount of 3,5 bn. $.
In the beginning of 2001 Marvin Bush lets tear back the bomb sniffing dogs and working times for safety guards were shortened.
6 September 2001
3,150 put options on "United Airlines" (UA)
3,150 are four times as much as the normal daily trade volume of UA shares is.
3,150 put options on United Airlines on 6 Sep 2001.
WTC: Bomb sniffing dogs are torn back from WTC and working hours of safety staff is shortened
Artículo: "Heightened Security Alert Had Just Been Lifted"
6 Sep 2001: The alarm status of WTC is lifted.
7 September 2001
27,294 put options on Boeing
It's more than 5 times as much as a normal trade volume with Boeing shares.
27,294 put options on Boeing on 7 Sep 2001.
10 September 2001
4,516 put options on "American Airlines" (AA)
This is 11 times as much as a normal daily average trade volume of "American Airlines" is.
4,516 put options on American Airlines on 10 Sep 2001
10 September 2001
Warnings before 9-11
High ranked Pentagon staff members cancel their flights for 11. September. Mayor of San Francisco Willie Brown gets a warning not to take a flight the next morning.
Article: "Top Pentagon Officials Cancel Flights on September 10, 2001"
Newsweek reports that high ranked Pentagon staff members had canceled their flights on 10 September 2001 for 11 September 2001
The mayor of San Francisco Willie Brown gets a warning not to take any flight the next morning.
<For Mayor Willie Brown, the first sign that something was miss came late Monday when he got a call from what he described as his airport security -- a full eight hours before yesterday's string of terrorist attacks -- advising him that Americans should be cautious about their air travel.>
Mayor Brown of San Francisco, portrait
Report about the warning on Brown that he was warned to be "especially" careful on 11 September 2001.
And at the same time Bin Laden is in Pakistan in a military hospital and is "investigated and treated carefully".
Article: "Hospital Worker: I Saw Osama"
Bin Laden in Pakistan in a military hospital on 10 September 2001. Report from 14 September 2001 from CBS Evening News.
Conclusion of Dylan Avery:
THERE WERE ENOUGH WARNINGS BEFORE 11. SEPTEMBER. BUT THE BUSH GOVERNMENT DID NOT REACT.
11 Sep 2001
Flight "exercises" on 11 September 2001
Officially there are even several "exercises" on that day which should simulate an airplane attack on the WTC or an airplane hijacking,
14 fighting jets stay in the "USA" to protect the "USA" on 11 September 2001.
-- e.g. the National Intelligence Board in Chantilly, Virginia: The "exercise" simulates the impact of a little business jet in their own building
-.- NORAD is performing several military exercises for several days at the same time:
-- exercise 1 ("Vigilant Guardian") simulating "US" wide operations of the areal defense
-- exercise 2 ("Northern Vigilents") is organized to misplace warplanes to Canada and Alaska to fight an imaginary Russian squadron
-- for exercise 3 for a "training mission" F-16-warplanes are misplaces from their station 24 km from the Pentagon to North Carolina 330 km far away.
By all this NORAD shall have pretexts that for the whole "USA" only 14 warplanes left to protect the "USA".
[All in all the many "exercises" correspond to an "organized disorder" to pretend a debility, and TV stations pretend on 11 September 2001 that "USA" would be "under attack" saying "USA under attack" or "Attack on America" frightening the whole world - yes there were attacks - but they were organized and performed by the own absolutely criminal "US" government Bush].
11 September 2001 impacts
11 Sep 2001
WTC impacts: Some eye witnesses report rockets or little airplanes
-- on 11 Sep 2001 the supervising boards of "USA" are that confused that they always have to ask if it's a real or a simulated airplane hijacking.
-- Reporter Avery says: "Some people meant have seen a rocket"
North Tower impact: Some witnesses report the impact had been a rocket.
-- Reporter "Mark" cites a witness: "There was a blue, round logo on the airplane. It did not look like a normal airliner because there were no windows on the side." North Tower impact: Testimony: On a little airplane could be seen a blue round logo.
North Tower impact: Testimony: The airplane with the blue round logo had no windows but it was an airplane without any window.
-- CNN speaker: "Mark, then it could have been an freight airplane."
Presumption that it could have been a freight airplane.
-- Witness: "I have not seen any window. It was not a normal flight as I ever had seen it on an airport. There was a blue front logo. It did not look like as if it would belong to the region."
North Tower impact: Testimony: "There was a blue front logo."
[There was a round, blue logo? This is known in the "USA" everywhere: It's the military NASA logo].
Logo of the military NASA.
The comparison of the collapse of the South Tower with the blast of other skyscrapers
When one compares the blast of the WTC with the blast of other skyscrapers the blast of the WTC towers is completed absolutely upright as it would be a normal blast of an industrial building. The reporter before the South Tower also reports a huge explosion:
The blast of the South Tower seen from bottom
Reporter (N.J. Burkett from Fox5 News) in front of the WTC before the collapse of the South Tower
Firemen before the WTC before the collapse of the South Tower
Sight of the North Tower before the collapse of the South Tower
North Tower and South Tower before the collapse of the South Tower
The pinnacle before the collapse of the South Tower
The main explosion in the South Tower
Collapse of the South Tower 1
Collapse of the South Tower 2
Collapse of the South Tower 3
Collapse of the South Tower 4
Collapse of the South Tower, the cloud of dust is spreading on the street
The blast of a normal skyscraper looks about the same at the end:
Blast of a normal skyscraper
Example of a blast of a skyscraper 01
Example of a blast of a skyscraper 02
Example of a blast of a skyscraper 03
Example of a blast of a skyscraper 04
Example of a blast of a skyscraper 05
Example of a blast of a skyscraper 06
The Boeing of Charles Burlingame who took part in the Pentagon exercises in 1989 already shall have crashed into the Pentagon.
The White House and it's lies
Avery says: Who has got the power is lying to his favor. Falsehood in the White House is normal.
"The official version about happenings never is this what really happened. And this people are willing to go much more far."
And these culprits of the Republican Party in the White House are risking all on 11 September 2001. The Bush administration gets much profit of 11 September: "Absolutely, absolutely."
Since 12 September 2001:
The Bush regime maintains a carpet knife theory with Arabs
12 Sep 2001
Rumsfeld maintains, airplanes had been the cause for the crash of the WTC towers
and the Pentagon should have been hit by a rocket, and the "terrorists" should have been armed with carpet knives:
Rumsfeld's statement on 12 September 2001: Carpet knives and a rocket on the Pentagon
Rumsfeld: <Here we're talking about plastic knives, and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building, and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.>
11 Sep 2001
The circumstances of the crash at the Pentagon "flight AA 77"
Hanjour could hardly fly a Cessna - and the Boeing is missing
The alleged "terrorist" Hanjour shall have performed a hairpin curve to hit the Pentagon in it's front.
Pilot Russ Wittenburg says the maintained flying maneuver at the Pentagon passing the freeway no. 395 besides had had an immediate crash before the plane hit the Pentagon as consequence.
But Hanjour himself could hardly fly well a Cessna 172 with only one engine.
Hanjour's airfield with flight school in August 2006 where he had chartered a Cessna.
Hanjour's main flight teacher Marcel Bernard.
The main flight teacher Marcel Bernard says about alleged pilot of the Boeing who is said having crashed into the Pentagon:
"He had a license [...] He wanted to be tested to charter an airplane [...] average or low average flight capacities. His knowledge in English was really bad."
The air traffic control of Dulles airport tracked flight 77 and estimated it would be a military flight.
Disrooted light poles before the Pentagon.
Light poles and the lawn before the Pentagon
There is a question of light poles hit by landing airplanes: Hit light poles during a landing bring heavy damage to the wings and the airplane crashes immediately. This was the case e.g. with an airplane which should meet ex President Bush senior at Houston on 22 November 2004. At the Pentagon five light poles had been even uprooted at one time and the airplane shall not have crashed immediately. This is not possible. The airplane had to crash before it hit the Pentagon when the light poles were uprooted by an airplane.
The lawn before the Pentagon stays intact without any trace of a sliding Boeing. Also this is an impossibility.
The lawn after the impact in front of the Pentagon is intact without any harm.
CNN reports that parts found in front of the Pentagon would have been only as big as a hand and this would not indicate a crash of a Boeing. Boeing parts would have been much bigger.
The Bush regime maintains the heat of the fuel would have "pulverized" the airplane.
CNN reports there is no proof that an airplane has hit the Pentagon.
An "investigation" of the DNA army laboratory wants to have identified 184 of 189 deads of the Pentagon crash. But to identify a person is not possible when the airplane had been pulverized - and it would not have been possible any more to take any DNA probe from the dead bodies.
[So, the contradictions about the Pentagon impact cannot be resolved].
A report from 30 Nov 2001 about the alleged identification of 184 of the 189 alleged Pentagon victims.
Also the airplane at Shanksville should have been pulverized by a crash, which is not possible (flight 93).
The impossibility of a pulverization of Boeing airplanes
Engines of Boeing consist of steel and titanium. Titanium has a melting point of 1,688°C. The engines have a diameter of 2,7m and are 3,6m long and have a weight of 6 tons. Kerosene (hydrocarbon) develops a maximum temperature of 1,120°C after 40 minutes optimal burning when the fuel supply is maintained.
And: There is not found any big part of a Boeing from flight 77.
The object in the Pentagon: A Cruise Missile
The engine found at the Pentagon has a diameter of only 1m and is not a part of a Boeing 757. Several Boeing representatives are confirming this.
There is no connection with an emergency power plant (auxiliary power unit, APU) of a Boeing 757 either as APU producer Honneywell in Phoenix (Arizona) confirms. An expert who wants to be anonymous speaks: "This is never an APU wheel." And Rolls Royce speaker John W. Brown's statement is: "It's not a part of a Rolls Royce Machine which I know."
So there is an engine which cannot be assigned, and there are missing two engines of a Boeing 757.
At the Pentagon there is found only one little engine with a diameter of 1 m. Other metal parts in front of the Pentagon are not even burnt or scratched. Part in front of the Pentagon which is said to be from an exploded Boeing 757.
The diffuser parts (enclosures with metal bows with holes) of the Boeing engines are missing. And all other parts of the crashed object can be collected and brought away by hand.
So this would be the first time in World's history that a crash of an airplane would pulverize an airplane.
The parts in front of the Pentagon can be removed by hand.
So a Boeing has surely not crashed when one compares with other crashed Boeings with whole wings, tail surfaces or parts of the body lying around which are bigger than human beings (e.g. at the crash of Helios Boeing 737 at 15 August 2005 with big fire, big wreckage parts, engines and bodies).
In the Pentagon there is not more than a hole of a diameter of 5 m in the Pentagon front to be found.
Pentagon with 5 m hole and firemen.
A Boeing 757 in front of the Pentagon, photo composition. According to the real impact at the Pentagon only the hulk had stuck in the pentagon and no other part, painted in red.
The Boeing 757 of flight 77 which allegedly had crashed into the Pentagon is 47m long, 13m high, has got a wing span of 38m and has got a weight of almost 100 tons. But after the alleged crash intact parts of the Pentagon front can be seen before the front crashes down: Windows are not broken, cable drums are staying around in front of the hole without any damage and have not been moved.
Pentagon: Intact windows besides the impact whole.
Cable reel in front of the Pentagon, not moved.
In the inner of the Pentagon exists a second hole at the inner ring, again with a diameter of about 5 m, in a distance of 100m from the first hole, three building rings away from the impact hole. The whole airplane had to destroy the Pentagon on a length of 100 m, passing through 2.7 m thick concrete enforced by steel, and the whole airplane should have been in the Pentagon. But there is nothing more found than the holes themselves. There is a second hole in the inner wall of the Pentagon with a diameter of 5 m, 100 m from the impact whole.
So, there has crashed an object in the Pentagon which produces a simple hole with 5 m diameter which can have an impact through 3 m thick steel concrete and after 100m one more time can produce a hole of 5 m diameter. So, this only can have been a cruise missile. Cruise Missile flight
During the Yugoslavia war the villa of Milosevic had been hit by a Cruise Missile "Tomahag" and had produced ruins in the same kind as the probable Cruise Missile at the Pentagon did: There was a crashed house front and some explosion in the inner without leaving a wreckage. The villa of Milosevic in Belgrade after a cruise missile attack. The house is burnt out, the front is almost intact, as the Pentagon also is.
Eye witnesses at the Pentagon report about different aircrafts
and these contradictions stay open [respectively there is the suspicion that some people have been bribed for certain testimonies].
The witnesses in the Pentagon itself are confronted with an explosion shock wave. They are thrown to the ground or thrown around. Open air witnesses in front of the Pentagon are thrown to 30 m through the air. Also the Sheraton hotel in a distance of 2.5 km gets a shock wave which can be felt.
Witnesses who were out of the Pentagon
-- witnesses see an AA jet from American Airlines coming Pentagon witness with the testimony that he had seen how an airliner hits the Pentagon.
-- or witnesses see a little passenger airliner for 8 to 20 persons without any logo Pentagon witness with the testimony that it had been a little airliner without logo.
-- and some other witnesses see a helicopter flying around the Pentagon landing on the helicopter landing field before the blast happened. CNN reports about a Pentagon witness who states that a helicopter had caused the explosion at the Pentagon.
Witnesses in the inner of the Pentagon who are confronted with the explosion - cordite in the Pentagon - no kerosene
The witnesses in the Pentagon itself are confronted with an explosion shock wave. They are thrown to the ground or thrown around. Open air witnesses in front of the Pentagon are thrown up to 30m through the air. Also the Sheraton hotel in a distance of 2.5 km gets a shock wave which can be felt.
<At that instant, a tremendous explosion ... shook the room. Mr. Murphy - was knocked entirely across the room, while [a cowerker] was jolted into the office.>
Pentagon witness Dr. Murphy indicates he was thrown through his room by the explosion shook wave.
Some of the witnesses in the Pentagon smell cordite in the air. This is an exploded explosive which is not part in the jet fuel (kerosene). So it had to be an explosive and the explosion cannot have been caused by an airplane with kerosene.
<We saw a huge black cloud of smoke, she said, saying it smelled like cordite, or gun smoke.>
Cordite consists of nitroguanidin, nitrocelluloses and nitroglycerin. When cordite explodes there is not much smoke and no flash but a strong shock wave and a silver explosion flame. Witnesses report a silver flash at the explosion.
To the contrary kerosene produces at the explosion much smoke, no explosion wave and a yellow to orange explosion flame.
Pentagon witnesses testify they had smelled cordite and it was not kerosene.
Comparison of an explosion of explosives and of kerosene
Pentagon explosion with a bright explosion flame
Kerosene explosion flame is very yellow and orange
But there were airplanes in the air space of the Pentagon during the time in question on 11 September 2001
After the Pentagon impact there are two airplanes in the air space over the Pentagon. Principally these airplanes were not allowed to fly because since 9:25 because there was ordered a total grounding. There can be seen:
-- an air-screw airplane similar to a C-130 like a gray war airplane which flies away
<Then the plane - it looked like a C-130 cargo plane - started turning away from the Pentagon.>
There is a cargo aircraft resp. an electronic warplane C-130 flying over the burning Pentagon.
-- a white airplane without logo cruising over the prohibited airspace over the White House, disappearing after 10 minutes. A white airplane es cruising over the White House near the burning Pentagon.
According to CNN reporters in front of the White House in the Lafayette Park there is a white jet cruising over the White House which normally is blocked air space. The Secret Service point to the jet on the sky with fear.
The FAA (Federal Aviation Administration) conceals until today which military exception permissions were given for flights against the grounding order.
CNN reporters report about a white jet cruising over the White House, and the Secret Service pointed to the jet with fear.
Reporters from Fox New and witnesses report some more explosions in the Pentagon, a second in the basement of the Pentagon.
Fox News reported of a second explosion in the Pentagon.
All videos of the safety cameras are confiscated
The videos of the safety cameras are all confiscated by the FBI:
-- of a gasoline station at the Sheraton Hotel
-- of the Sheraton Hotel itself
-- of the traffic control board at the freeway.
This is the safety camera of the motorway besides the Pentagon.
Pentagon petrol station: The video is confiscated by the FBI, and also all other videos of safety cameras.
The indication of the employee José Velazquez from CITGO gas station, citation from the review National Geographic from 12 November 2001:
<I've never seen what the pictures looked like. The FBI was here within minutes and took the film.>
The Sheraton hotel at the Pentagon. Also the supervising video of the Sheraton hotel was confiscated by the FBI. When the Bush regime wants to prove that an airplane had hit the Pentagon, "they only had to publish the videos."
The FBI confiscates all films and intimidates the employees not to give testimony at all. The Bush regime has not the intention to give the proof that a Boeing had crashed into the Pentagon by publishing the videos. There are published 5 pictures from the camera of the helicopter landing field, only, and these pictures show a bright, white explosion flame which cannot be from kerosene and from an airplane. There cannot be seen any Boeing 757.
Pentagon explosion on the video seen from the safety camera of the helicopter base.
According to all facts there never was a Boeing crashed into the Pentagon, but a remote controlled Cruise Missile rocket.
Pentagon impact and the position of Rumsfeld's office at the other side
The protected Rumsfeld Nazi at the other side of the Pentagon
What a coincidence: "Defense Minister" Rumsfeld with his office and with his plans to fulfill the war which was not fulfilled in 1991 against Iraq - this Rumsfeld is situated at the other side of the Pentagon rocket impact. The government does not answer any question and keeps the videos secret.
[Nazi Rumsfeld with his Iraq wars
Nazi Rumsfeld has well prepared the war in Iraq to play the second round after the first round in 1991 was not fulfilled completely. So, Nazi Rumsfeld has not got more than war in his head. But the whole NATO beliefs him when Rumsfeld and Bush call for the case of alliance and when Rumsfeld maintains that the "USA" had been attacked by Arabs. But the truth is: No Arab ever attacked "USA". Why should they do this when "USA" is the best oil client of Arabia and when 8% of the "USA" (8% of the shares of the bourse) are in Arab hands...]
11 Sep 2001
The blasts of the WTC towers more or less in fall velocity
The WTC towers are 110 floors high. All over the building bombs are planted and are detonating. Witness Teresa Veliz in the 47th floor reports: "One had no idea where one should flee."
WTC explosions: Witness Teresa Veliz was working in the 47th floor in the North Tower.
WTC witness Teresa Veliz:
"There were explosions going off everywhere. I was convinced that there were bombs planted all over the place and someone was sitting at a control panel pushing detonator buttons. There was another explosion. And another. I didn't know where to run.
Teresa Veliz, working on the 47th floor of the North Tower when Flight 11 hit."
The blast of the WTC towers in more or less fall velocity
9:59 N.Y. time: Crash of the South Tower
after 56 min. of fire on four floors, the tower is crashing in about 10 seconds, the tower is 408 m high, the pure velocity of fall would be 9.2 seconds.
The South Tower consists of 100,000 tons of steel, with 47 main poles. The rubble is thrown partly far away 150 m.
WTC: Blast of the South Tower
10:28 N.Y. time: Blast of the North Tower
after 103 min. Fire on 4 floors, crash in about 10 seconds, 410m high, velocity of fall would be 9.2 seconds.
The South Tower consists of 100,000 tons of steel, with 47 main poles. The rubble is thrown partly far away 150 m.
All in all the towers consist of 425,000 m3 concrete.
WTC: Blast of the North Tower.
17:20 N.Y. time: Blast of WTC building 7
Tenants in this building are the "US" Secret Service CIA, the "US" Ministry of Defense, offices from the IRS (Internal Revenue Service for tax collection), the safety bunker of New York's mayor Giuliani and offices from SEC ( "US" Securities and Exchange Commission) with 3,000 or 4,000 cases with Wall Street criminalities. 47 floors are blasted within 6 seconds into little peaces.
17:20 o'clock: Blast of WTC building 7
WTC: Blast of building 7
Precise blast of WTC building no. 7, film
Wreckage of WTC building 7, blasted in 6 seconds.
Avery says: The towers of the WTC and WTC building 7 are the only steel framework buildings which have allegedly collapsed by kerosene fire. The Bush regime maintains that fuel tanks in building 7 had been set on fire and by this building 7 had collapsed. Th two towers of the WTC and the building WTC 7 are worldwide the only steel framework buildings who allegedly have collapsed by fire of kerosene resp. of fuel.
If one compares this with other fires the cause "fire" cannot be possible for the collapse because other steel framework buildings burnt longer (Venezuela, Madrid) and they did not collapse. There were burning skyscrapers: Empire State Building in 1945, WTC fire in 1975, burning skyscraper in Los Angeles on 4 Mai 1988, another in Philadelphia on 23th February 1991, another one in Venezuela, another one in Madrid, and all did not collapse
Examples of burning skyscrapers in steel framework construction which did not collapse
28 July 1945: Bomber B-25 in Empire State Building (in stone framework), 28 July 1945. The bomber had no orientation in the fog any more and crashed into the 97th floor of the Empire State Building. And the skyscraper stayed upright.
14 February 1975: Fire in the North Tower of the WTC from 9th to the 14th floor, newspaper article of New York Times of 14 February 1975. On the base of this fire sprinkler systems are installed in the WTC.
4 May 1988: Burning skyscraper in Los Angeles with 62 floors does not collapse, 4 May 1988. 23 February 1991: Burning skyscraper with 38 floors in Philadelphia does not collapse, 23 February 1991.
17 October 2004: Burning skyscraper with 56 floors in Venezuela does not collapse, 17 October 2004.
12 February 2005: Burning skyscraper "Windsor" in Madrid with 32 floors. The fire is burning almost for 24 hours, the 10 floors on the top are collapsing, but the skyscraper does not collapse, 12 February 2005.
And despite of all this the Bush regime continues to maintain that the WTC towers had collapsed after 56 and 103 minutes because of 38,000 liters kerosene (10,000 gallons) on some few floors, and they had collapsed down to the basement upright. And in the case of the South Tower the big part of the kerosene is said having exploded outside of the tower with a huge fireball, as the film shows. But considering all the other facts of the other skyscrapers the collapse down to the basement because of kerosene is an impossibility.
Add to this the South Tower was hit only after the North Tower, but the South tower collapsed first before the North Tower, and the South Tower was hit only at the margin, so there are other impossibilities.
The fall velocity of the 400 m high towers is 9.2 seconds. The collapse was done in 10 seconds. This is a good controlled blast.
The construction of the WTC towers: Steel cannot melt because of kerosene
425,000 m3 concrete are pulverized. This is a story. Expert Van Romero, vice president of the Institute for Mining and Technology of New Mexico first indicates that it had been a blast, but after 10 days he takes back his statement and maintains it had been the fire by the airplanes which provoked the collapse of the WTC towers.
Van Romero, vice president on the institute for mining and technology of New Mexico
Van Romero states first only an explosion can have caused the collapse of the WTC towers.
<"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse."
Van Romero, Vice President for Research of New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology>
Hyman Brown, professor and construction manager of the WTC maintains kerosene temperatures of over 1,100°C had weakened the steel and had caused the collapse of the WTC towers.
Kewin Ryan from the Underwriters Laboratories utters in a letter to Frank Gayle from the Institute for Standard Technology (NIST) that the steel had been certificated, that the steel had been the best steel available (E119) and that the steel had to resist to 1,100°C:
"We know that the steel parts were certificated according to ASTM E119. This standard includes that the material has to resist to 1,100°C for several hours. We all agree that the steel had these characteristics. Even fire protected steel would not melt before having been red hot and reaching almost 1,600 °C. When Dr. Brown says steel of a temperature of 1,100°C would melt this makes simply no sense. When the steel had been weakened and melted so kerosene cannot be the reason with it's short fires in the towers."
Other experts pretend the WTC steel would have melt because of the little fires. Some days after the letter Ryan is dismissed.
[This is the new national policy of the "USA": The truth is dismissed...]
Kevin Ryan, laboratory expert
Ryan indicates that the WTC steel was certified and was composed for a fire for several hours of 1,100°C.
<We know that the steel components were certified to ASTM E119. The time temperature curves for this standard require the samples to be exposed to temperatures around 2000 F for several hours. And as we all agree, the steel applied met those specifications.
Kevin Ryan, Underwriters Laboratories.>
Ryan indicates that the WTC steel is glowing only with 1,600°C, and only with whit temperature it can melt.
Ryan states clearly: The fire was not the cause of the WTC collapse.
<Additionally, I think we can all agree that even unfireproofed steel will not melt until reaching red-hot temperatures of nearly 3000F. Why Dr. Brown would imply that 2000F would melt the high-grade steel used in those buildings makes no sense at all."
Kevin Ryan, Underwriters Laboratories>
<This story just does not add up. It steel from those buildings did soften or melt, I'm sure we can all agree that this was certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires in those towers."
Kevin Ryan, Underwriters Laboratiories>
The reporters presume a blast of the WTC already on 11 September 2001
The CNN reporters etc. presume already on 11 September 2001 that the perfect collapse of the WTC towers had been a planned row of explosions which is not possible to perform without explosive team and without manipulation on the inner infrastructure.
CNN reporters presume on 11 September already that the WTC towers collapsed by a controlled blast.
Reporters presume that for such a controlled blast one has to manipulate the whole inner structure of the WTC towers.
Also the Federal authorities presume already on 11 September 2001 that explosions had been the cause for the collapse of the WTC towers.
The time between the impacts and the breakdown of the South Tower is full of explosions
According to NBC reporter Pat Dawson the chief of the fire brigade of N.Y., Albert Turi, is reported that in the WTC could be bombs planted. In the following time Turi tries to get his men out of the towers. According to Turi in the 60 minutes since the first impact there are two big explosions in the towers. Turi means clearly that bombs had been planted in the towers.
NBC-Reporter Dawson about the chief of the New York Fire Department, Albert Turi
Pat Dawson, NBC Reporter at WTC on 11 September 2001
Reporter Dawson reports that the chief of the New York fire department, Albert Turi, had news of the bombs in the WTC towers.
Reporter Dawson discloses that Turi presumes bombs in the WTC.
Dawson discloses that chief of fire department Albert Turi means that somebody had placed bombs in the WTC.
Two or three explosions weaken the WTC towers at the fundamental structures, first in the South Tower.
TV report about the three big explosions in the basement of the South Tower.
NBC leaves open the possibility of explosions on 11 September 2001.
Witnesses for explosions in the WTC towers between airplane impact and the total blast
Working people in the WTC towers are heavily injured by the explosions - other witnesses help them to the ambulances
Witnesses report from many explosions in the towers. The working people are partly heavily injured from the explosions. The impact of the explosion throws the people through the WTC. They protect their faces with their hands and the arms are totally burnt and the skin is hanging down in rags. At least the people are covered with dark dust.
The heavily injured people are brought to hospitals by the ambulance.
[There are WTC witnesses with heavy injuries and they are never heard
There must be many WTC victims with heaviest burnings in the "USA" who live yet and until now they were not allowed to report anything and they have not brought an action until now. In fact this is a case for a class-action. Further witnesses for the WTC injured people who suffered heaviest burnings by the explosion are the rescuer of the burnt:
1. people who brought the WTC injured people to the ambulance
2. all ambulance drivers
3. all doctors in the ambulances who gave first aid to the burnt
4. the hospital staff who gave treatment to the burnt from the WTC].
More witnesses for explosions between airplane impact and the final blast of the towers
This WTC witness indicates that he was thrown back from an explosion in a WTC tower in the 8th floor.
This WTC witness indicates that he came by tube and also in the tube tunnel a big bomb had exploded.
CNN reporter tells about a big explosion in the South Tower long after the airplane impact.
CNN reporter tells about a second heavy explosion in the South Tower.
CBS reporters tells about a third big explosion in the South Tower and about the blast of the South Tower.
There are more witnesses who state that the collapse of the South Tower was an explosion.
A witness of Fox News in police uniform states that the collapse of the South Tower was a big explosion.
Another witness of Fox News states about the South Tower that the explosion "came down".
This filmed witness says:
"When I tried to say 'People, wait a moment' there was a big explosion coming down. Everything it went black. Everything came down, glass are popping, people are hurt, soft dirt on top of them, and there was a big explosion and everything was black, real dark like smoke."
People who have a notion what's happening like this filmed person make a prediction that after the total blast of the South Tower also the second tower will "come down".
An eyewitness reports that on 10:30 there was a big explosion and the fire marshal chased all people out of the tower with the indication that the tower will not survive another third explosion.
A WTC eyewitness reports that there had been a big explosion on 10:30.
The WTC eyewitness reports that after the explosion on 10:30 the fire marshal chased all people out of the tower.
At 10:38 the North Tower is blasted. The TV stations report a huge explosion. Without the huge explosion the collapse is not possible.
The blast of the North Tower with a "huge explosion"
Fox News reports a fourth big explosion on the WTC site for 10:38.
Fox News reports a big explosion and the collapse of the North Tower.
WCBS reports the collapse of the North Tower by a huge explosion.
Fox News Alert reports from the helicopter that in the North Tower was a big explosion at the top and much smoke was coming out out of the top of the North Tower and then the last of the two towers collapsed.
Light flashes in the WTC towers
Eye witnesses watch light flashes on the fronts before the total blast
Eye witnesses in a distance of 2 1/2 blocks can see the collapse and can see a series of light flashes before the collapse. This indicates precise inner blasts in the floors, at the South Tower e.g. about 6 light flashes between the 10th and 15th floor. There is a "crackling noise" before the tower collapses. Newspaper report:
"One eyewitness whose office is near the World Trade Center told AFP that he was standing among a crowd of people on Church Street, about two-and-a-half blocks from the South tower, when he saw 'a number of brief light sources being emitted from inside the building between floors 10 and 15.' He saw about six of these brief flashes, accompanied by 'a crackling sound' before the tower collapsed."
Witness janitor Rodriguez testifies explosions - he had chased all people out
Explosions in the North Tower between the total blast of the South Tower and the total blast of the North Tower
Janitor Willy Rodriguez, portrait
The North Tower suffers the same explosions as the South Tower. Janitor Willy Rodriguez is janitor in the WTC since 20 years. When the airplane impact happens he is in the first basement floor. Then there is a bang deep in the basement. He believes that a generator with diesel oil in the basement has exploded.
[But this is hardly possible because diesel is hardly explosive and it's difficult to make it burning].
Rodriguez: But then there was another bang, but this time on the top of the tower. People in different floors are hurt by the explosions, e.g. Philipe David, a man from Honduras filling the vending machines and taking stocks. He had protected his face with his hands and the fire wave burnt all his arms and parts of his face. His skin was hanging in rags from his arms. Janitor Rodriguez wants to make an emergency call to the emergency unit EMS in the South Tower, and at the same time there is another explosion. The tower is shaking. Rodriguez thinks there is an earthquake. Then he orders: "All out here!" and chases all out of the tower. Rodriguez brings the injured David on his shoulders to the ambulance.
Janitor Rodriguez: "Somebody cried: 'Explosion! Explosion!' " Janitor Rodriguez: He chased all out of the WTC tower because this was not an earthquake but a heavy explosion, and with a third explosion the tower would not survive: "All out here!"
Janitor Rodriguez brought the heaviest injured WTC victim Philipe David on his shoulders to the ambulance.
[There are WTC witnesses with heaviest injuries
By this the film "Loose Change 2" by Avery confirms the second time that there are a lot of WTC victims with heaviest burnings living in the "USA". They all never were permitted to give testimony until now and they have not brought any action. In fact this case would be a case of a class-action. The witnesses with the big burning wounds were never allowed to give testimony until now, and the media are sleeping].
When the question comes to the number of explosions janitor Rodriguez means there had been a "countless" number of explosions. Since the 12th September there were discussions if there had been gas bottles in the kitchens which had exploded. But the WTC had fire class A, and in the kitchen was no gas permitted. Add to this there were many diesel tanks in the basement. Officially there is missing any explanation for the explosions by the Bush regime.
Janitor Rodriguez indicates that the WTC had fire class A and gas bottles are impossible with this fire class.
[And the diesel is only hard to be inflamed].
[Conclusion: there was a total blast by big explosions on the basement and on the top at the same time
Only after these additional explosions the towers are collapsing. According to witnesses the collapse is "an explosion" and not a collapse. All people on the WTC site can hear and feel the huge explosions.
The explosion which leads to the collapse is happening in the basement and on the top at the same time.
The destroyed lobby of the North Tower: The power of the explosions before the collapse
The lobby in the North Tower. All windows are blown out.
Avery: A fire 400 m down the airtight elevator shaft is not possible as maintains the Bush regime was the reason for the destruction of the lobby.
The lobby (the entrance hall for both towers in the North Tower) is destroyed even before the collapse as if there had been a bomb exploded:
-- Avery: "The windows of the lobby in the North Tower are blown out"
-- Avery: "Marble panels were blown off of the walls".
Officially the Bush regime maintains that the lobby had been destroyed by "an erasing fireball that went burling down the elevator shafts" (Avery). But according to Avery this is impossible:
"The World Trade Center's core and the elevator shafts were hermetically sealed, aka airtight" (Avery). So: "The fire cannot possibly have had enough oxygen to travel 1.300 feet (400m) down." (Avery)
[But: It's possible that after the explosion the core of the WTC was not airtight any more and by this an explosion wave can be possible until down to the basement].
The firefigther's reports about the explosions in the WTC towers
Firefighters testifying the blast of the towers floor by floor: "Bum bum bum bum bum!"
Above all the surviving firemen are witnesses for the blast of the WTC towers and for the explosions before the total blast. They mourn all in all 343 dead firefighters. The firemen who have survived resp. had not been yet working in the towers could run away. They describe the explosions. At the total blast each basement of the towers was blown out: "Bum bum bum bum bum!"
Firefighter in the lobby of the North tower see the shadow of the South tower how the South tower collapses.
Firefighter: "We began to run. Floor by floor was being popped out .. all the way down."
Firefighter witness (left) speaks: "Every floor was blasted separately: Boom boom boom boom boom."
Firefighter witness (right) speaks: The demolition of the towers was performed floor by floor: "Boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom!"
[Until now the firefighters have not been permitted to give testimony in public to justice of Stupid States].
Firefighter witnesses of "Engine 7" of the fire department tell about the conditions in the lobby in the North Tower before the total blast
-- a firefighter presumes that there must have been a bomb exploded, and then he saw from the lobby of the North Tower how the shadow of the South Tower came down.
The firefighter who was in the lobby gives testimony of a big explosion.
The firefighter was in the lobby of the North Tower and saw how the shadow of the South Tower came down.
-- another firefighter never had seen such a damage before
The firefighter was surprised about the damage in the lobby of the North Tower.
-- another firefighter gives testimony: "The lobby is about 6 stories high [...] All the glass was taken out" and "broken" [...] "There were ten foot by ten foot marble panels that went off the walls"
The firefighter was in the lobby and presumed that there had been a bomb explosion as reason for the destruction in the WTC lobby.
Firefighter about the WTC lobby: "There were ten foot by ten foot marble panels that went off the walls"
-- another firefighter gives testimony: "The freight elevator was just blown [...] and in the 30th floor there was another explosion."
The firefighter indicates that the freight elevator of the North Tower of the WTC was "just blown".
And in the 30th floor of the WTC North Tower there was a huge explosion: "I heard a loud boom".
"and in this moment we heard a huge explosion" [when the South Tower came down].
Louie Cacchioli, 51 years old, testified to "People Weekly" the following::
"I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building."
The Bush regime is concealing the firemen's reports documents for years. Until the first reports are released there is only the possibility to ask the firemen themselves.
Since 2002: The first part of firefighter's radio transmission: Explosions - no big fire on the impact location
All in all there 343 firefighters loose their lives in the collapsing WTC towers. The Bush regime hinders any publication of documents of the radio transmissions of the fire department for years. Up to the first release of radio communication of the firefighters the research can only have firemen reports. But now the data base about the events in the interior of the WTC towers gets more precise yet:
The first part of firefighter's radio transmission: Explosions - no big fire on the impact location at the South Tower
Since November 2002 a first part of radio transmissions of the fire department is released. The radio transmission report from the South Tower:
-- the firefighters have reached the fire at the 79th floor
Article: "NY firefighters reaches South Tower crash zone"
2002 is released that the firefighters reached the fire in the WTC South Tower.
-- there are explosions in the floors 7 and 8:
"I got, uh, an eyewitness who said there was an explosion on floors 7 and 8, 7, 8."
Firefighters report explosions in the WTC South Tower in the floors 7 and 8.
-- "Battalion 3 to Dispatch, we've just had another explosion!"
The firefighters from battalion 3 report an explosion in the WTC South Tower.
-- by the second explosion many firefighters outside the WTC in Warren Street are covered with dust:
"... Warren Street, because of the secondary explosion We've got numerous people covered with dust from the secondary explosion."
The firefighters in Warren Street report they had been covered with dust by the second explosion.
-- another explosion in the tower, floor 10 to 13:
"We got another explosion on the Tower, 10-13, 10-13!" [floor]
The firefighters report another explosion on the floors 10 to 13 in the WTC South Tower.
-- a huge explosion in Tower 2 and the collapse of the South Tower:
"Tower 2 has had a major explosion and what appears to be a complete collapse surrounding the entire area!"
The firefighters report a huge explosion and the collapse of the WTC South Tower.
-- Explosion in the WTC North Tower.
Firemen chief Palmer reaches the fire in the South Tower in the 78th floor and is planning to extinguish it:
"Battalion 7, ladder 15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines. Radio that. 78th floor."
Chief Palmer reports about 2 isolated fires in the 78th floor.
Chief Palmer means it would be possible to extinguish the fires with two tubes.
It seems the fire would have been possible to be extinguished. Otherwise Palmer never had had such a plan and it would never had been possible for him to get to the fire location when it had been an inferno.
The statement of the Bush regime that a Boeing impact had provoked a fire inferno in the WTC South Tower is a big lie.
Avery: It seems the WTC South Tower was not a fire inferno otherwise chief Palmer had not made the proposal to extinguish the fire with two tubes.
12.8.2005: The second part of 15 hours firemen's radio transmissions and interviews:
On 12 August 2005 the second part of radio transmissions of the firefighters is released.
Article: "Chaos, pain of 9/11 revealed in recordings, documents"
-- firefighter Stephen Gregory, Commissioner of the Bureau of Communication, describes that there were explosions, and whole explosion series:
"I saw low-level flashes. [Lieutenant Evangelista] asked me if I saw flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down."
-- the firemen describe bright flashes coming from the inner of the towers, these are blasts of inner elements
Firefighter Gregory reports that he had seen flashes in the WTC tower fronts before the collapse.
This corresponds to a normal demolition with other buildings like this one on the foto.
-- and before the collapse the explosions in the towers are all bigger and bigger as if it would be a normal blast. Firefighter Stephen Gregory:
"You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw."
Firefighter Gregory tells about whole rows of explosions, and the explosions had been always bigger and bigger.
This corresponds to a normal demolition with other buildings like this one on the foto.
All in all the events with the explosions are going on as if it would be a normal blast of a big building.
Firefighter's report by Captain Karin de Shore of Battalion 46 about a row of explosions in the WTC towers:
"Somewhere around the middle of the WTC there was this orange and red flash - Initially it was just one then [it] just kept popping all the way around the building and [it] started to explode."
And this corresponds to a normal demolition.
The women captain firefighter Karin de Shore reports that the explosions in the WTC towers were getting always more and more:
"As far as I could see these popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger going both up and down and then all around the building."
And this corresponds to a normal demolition.
The measurements of the seismological station: 2,1 and 2,3 according to Richter scale
Report about seismic earthquake data of the University Palisades of 11 September 2001 in state of New York, newspaper report: "Seismic Data Refutes Official Explanation"
Newspaper headline of "American Free Press" declares clearly: "Seismic data refutes official explanation".
A university observation ward at Palisades (state of New York) is measuring:
-- shortly before the collapse of the South Tower an earthquake of 2.1 points on Richter scale
-- shortly before the collapse of the North Tower an earthquake of 2.3 points on Richter scale.
Earthquake shortly before the blast of the WTC South Tower on 9:59 and 4 seconds: 2.1 points on Richter scale.
Earthquake shortly before the blast of the WTC North Tower at 10:28 and 31 seconds: 2.3 points on Richter scale.
Corresponding to Won-Young Kim, this corresponds to the vibration by explosions like in big quarries with more than 80,000 pounds of explosives of ammonium nitrate. Newspaper report:
Won-Young Kim indicates that the WTC blast corresponds with a huge blast in a quarry.
Kim indicates that the WTC earthquake corresponds with a blast of 80,000 pounds ammonium nitrate explosives.
<One of the seismologists, Won-Young Kim, told AFP that the Palisades seismographs register daily under-ground explosions from a quarry 20 miles away. These blasts are caused by 80,000 pounds of ammonium nitrate and cause local earthquakes between Magnitude 1 and 2.>
<These blasts are caused by 80,000 pounds of ammonium nitrate and cause local earthquakes between Magnitude 1 and 2. Kim said the 1993 truck-bomb at the WTC did not register on the seismographs because it was "not coupled" to the ground.>
One has to know: Not the parts or the dust of the WTC coming down cause the vibration because the parts fall on other buildings mostly and mostly do not reach the earth, but: The vibrations are caused by the explosions in the basements of the towers and in the towers themselves.
Before the collapse of the North Tower e.g. the camera tripod of a film maker is shaking for 12 seconds. The film shows the flashes all over in the tower.
The WTC rubble mountains are getting always hotter and hotter
The heat in the rubble mountains lasts over a month after the blasts of 11 September 2001 - hot spots in the rubble mountains 3 to 5 weeks let the steel melt
The president of the company "Controlled Demolition", Mark Loizeaux - the company with the order to remove the rubble mountains - he reports to the "American Free Press" 3 to 5 weeks after the blast of the WTC site about hot spots (where explosives developed more heat after the explosion) and spots with melted steel on the base of the central steal beams in the 7th basement floor. That means: The heat development in the rubble mountains after 11 September was that high that the steel was melt there. This could be found in both tower basements and also in the basement of building 7. [This is an absolute proof for explosive blasts at the base of the buildings because kerosene does not develop such a heat in the rubble].
Loizeaux indicates that there were hot spots with melted steel, but then indicates in a false manner (following the Bush regime) that the melted steel had been the cause for the collapse of the towers. But this is a false indication because the explosives developed their great heat only in the rubble mountains:
Mark Loizeaux, president of "Controlled Demolition".
Loizeaux' report about central fires with melted steel in the rubble mountains 4 weeks after 11 September 2001
Loizeaux' report about central fires in the 7th basement floor on the elevator's basement yet 4 weeks after 11 September 2001.
<In the basements of the collapsed towers, where the 47 central support columns connected with the bedrock, hot spots of "literally molten steel" were discovered more than a month after the collapse. Such persistent and intense residual heat, 70 feet below the surface, in an oxygen starved environment, could explain how these crucial structural supports failed.> x
<These incredibly hot areas were found "at the bottoms of the elevator shafts of the main towers, down seven [basement] levels," Loizeaux said.>
Mark Loizeaux indicates where the centers with the melted steel are:
-- in the towers under the elevator shafts in the 7th basement floor
-- the highest temperature can be found in the East corner of the South Tower with yet 747°C (1377° Fahrenheit)
-- the steel itself has more than the double of the temperature
-- add to this melted steel can be found under building WTC 7.
[6 weeks after the 11 September 2001 there is a heat of 1500° C in the rubble mountains yet. So there has to be a vast quantity of explosives in the rubble mountains because kerosene of a Boeing never would cause such a heat in the rubble mountain].
(see also: David Ray Griffin; In: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1951610169657809939&q=9%2F11)
Films about the blasts of the WTC towers: Flashes and explosions
WTC blast with explosions which precede the collapse 1.
WTC blast with explosions which precede the collapse 2.
WTC blast with explosions which precede the collapse 3.
There is a film about the collapse of the WTC towers is e.g. from Etienne Sauret "The First 24 Hours". Film maker Sauret has got a balcony from which the WTC could be seen. The tripod of the camera is shaking 12 seconds before the tower collapses as if there was a little earthquake.
[This is the proof that there is a conformance between the measurements of the seismological station and the movements of the tripod of the camera: Both have reported the same earthquake before the collapse, and the earthquakes are provoked by incredible explosions in the basements of the towers].
Film by Etienne Sauret: The earthquake with the explosions on the base of the North Tower is 12 seconds BEFORE the collapse of the tower. The tripod is shaking 12 seconds BEFORE the collapse of the WTC North Tower.
Before the collapse of the North Tower e.g. the tripod of a film maker is shaking for 12 seconds. The front of the tower is flashing and flashing all over the front.
Film of Sauret: 12 seconds AFTER the earthquake began the WTC North Tower is collapsing.
How have the bombs been planted in the towers? - "Drills" and "exercises" under Marvin Bush
Witness Ben Fountain, finance analyst in WTC, indicates to "People Magazine" that before 11. September there were again and again "unusual drills" with evacuations. During weeks before the 11. September parts of the towers had been evacuated for safety reasons for the "exercises" and this had always been without any announcement, also in WTC building 7. Indication of finance analyst Ben Fountain about spontaneous evacuations before 11 September 2001.
Witness A. Daria Coard, safety guard at the North Tower, indicates to "Newsday", that the security had to work 12 hours shifts because of threats. But since 6 September 2001 the bomb sniffing dogs had been drawn back. Indication of Daria Coard about 12 hours shifts of the safety staff, but at 6 September 2001 the bomb sniffing dogs had been drawn back.
So there is the question who authorized all this within the WTC safety system. It's a brother of president Bush, Marvin Bush. Marvin Bush had been in the supervisory board of the electronic safety company "Securacom" 1993 to 2000. Securacom is backed by "Kuwait American Corporation".
Marvin Bush with "president" George W. Bush and others.
Marvin Bush, portrait, responsible for the "safety" in the WTC.
From the early 1990s up to the day of 9-11 2001 Securacom was working for WTC. By chance Securacom is also working for United Airlines and for Dulles international airport.
And Marvin Bush is ancient director of the HCC Insurance Holding which assured parts of the WTC.
Securacom is named Stratesec now. More data is not available about Securacom SEC. And the Bush brothers are keeping quiet.
[So its practical that officially there were Arab "terrorists" who are said having blasted the WTC because by this Marvin Bush is without any process and for murder of about 3,000 humans without any penalty. The "president" keeps his "protecting hand" over him...].
The fast removal of the rubble on Ground Zero - the hot rubble
["Ground Zero" is a term of the atomic bomb weapon's industry and names a spot where an atomic bomb was tested and where nothing is living any more. So, the term "Ground Zero" wants pretend to the "American" population that the "USA" had been attacked by an atomic bomb which Saudi Arabia does not possess].
Not even FEMA could see the rubble mountains. Any expert sight is prohibited.
The mayor of New York, Giuliani, plays a cooperating role with the Bush regime. He releases the rubble of the WTC at once to be recycled overseas. Not even FEMA is allowed to take a look at Ground Zero. All the evidence and proofs are destroyed and the agencies and offices have no access to the site of crime. The company "Controlled Demolition" is responsible for the removal of the rubble.
[The connection to the government seems to be suspicious. Already the Oklahoma attack could be a manipulation of the CIA].
Perhaps this was an "exercise" for 11 September 2001: Two tanks of the Second World War times blasted
Already on 15 July 2001 the company "Controlled Demolition" is blasting two 120 m high fuel tanks of the times of Second World War. It can be speculated if this was a training for the blasts of the two WTC towers.
"Controlled Demolition" may remove the rubble. On 15 July 2001 they blasted two tanks, perhaps as a preparing "exercise" for the WTC.
[Dr. David Ray Griffin: There are evidences for explosives in the WTC towers - terrorists don't have these possibilities - the length of the steal beam parts for lorries - the pan cake theory is not possible
Dr. David Ray Griffin during a speech at the university of Madison, Wisconsin.
Griffin: Not one single terrorist had had access to the WTC towers to prepare such a precise blast of the towers.
And: The steal beams were blasted mostly in parts of a length of about 100 feet for the easy transport on lorries.
And: The pan cake theory with the claim that one floor had fallen on the other cannot be right, because the 47 main steal beams cannot collapse and had been stuck in the air.
Griffin: The pan cake theory is not possible because
then the 47 central steal beams would be stuck in the air.
(David Ray Griffin from the University of Madison in Wisconsin; author of "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions" and "The New Pearl Harbor"; www.mujca.com
Conclusions by Avery: The blasted WTC
-- the destruction of the WTC was a controlled and well prepared blast which was prepared secretly
-- the destruction of the WTC is a psychological attack on the whole "American" people
-- the blast and the psychological attack was executed with a military precision.
Conclusion by Michael Palomino: The mass murder of 2749 people remains without process until now
There were 2749 people cold -blooded murdered in the WTC towers. That is mass murder, and despite of all proofs and witnesses the mass murder remains without any process against the culprits. Investigations are not possible because of secrecy. Lots of witnesses are not questioned, and the judges in the "USA" at one side are bribed or they don't have the courage to fight for the truth against the criminal Bush family and their criminal friends.
The propaganda of the criminal Bush government is going on, and with this "USA" morally are in a desperate condition like in 1968 because all war reasons against Afghanistan and against Iraq have not one single moral base.
(Number of victims from: Ria Novosti: "Recording 11 September"; 12 October 2006;
And: The wholes in the towers are practically empty - Boeings are missing - there were little airplanes
Avery never shows the empty wholes in the towers. There have been relatively little airplanes which flew into the towers so there is no airplane tail or wing hanging out of the towers. The cartoon films always show how a Boeing hits a tower and then comes a fireball and when there is no fireball anymore the wholes are empty. The witness' reports saying that there were only little airplanes without windows hitting the towers - so probably remote controlled drones - seem to be right. The cartoons of the CIA are discovered one more time but took the whole world for a ride. This was a good amusement for the Bush regime with it's CIA and the warmongers Rumsfeld and Cheney.
Airplane impact into the WTC North Tower: The TV shows a Boeing and an explosion and then the hole is empty
TV film (cartoon): Airplane impact into the WTC North Tower. The object is said to be a Boeing.
What is monumental in this film is the noise of an airplane in the film. By this the whole world means the Boeing would be real.
TV film (cartoon): Airplane impact into the WTC North Tower. The explosion cloud indicates that a big part of the kerosene burns out of the tower, but there is happening something more...
TV film (cartoon): The hole in the WTC North Tower remains without any Boeing. There is burning the material of the tower, but there is no airplane tail stuck in the tower.
Reality: Here is the empty hole of the WTC North Tower. There are no parts of a Boeing here sticking in the hole after an explosion: There is no forged trunk, there is no airplane tail, there is no wing, nothing! Or was the airplane made of paper? Surely not.
Airplane impact into the WTC South Tower: The TV shows a Boeing and an explosion, and then the hole is empty
TV film (cartoon): Airplane impact into the WTC South Tower: TV pictures of the alleged flight: The wings have not the same length, and the WTC North Tower is missing. And the airplane is black, but should reflect in the sunlight.
TV film (cartoon): The alleged airplane impact of a Boeing into the WTC South Tower. But the wings are reflecting each in a different way, something must be wrong here, too.
What's monumental in this film is also the noise of the airplane. By this the whole world means the Boeing would be real.
TV film (cartoon): According to the TV film the main part of the kerosene burns out of the tower and provokes a huge explosion cloud. At the same time the empty whole of the WTC North Tower can be seen. And behind the kerosene cloud is happening something incredible again...
Reality: The hole of the WTC South Tower is empty, there are no parts of a Boeing here sticking in the hole, no wings, no airplane tail, there is no forged trunk of a Boeing in the whole, there is simply nothing. Or was also this airplane made of paper? Surely not.
Question: Where are the Boeings? And where are the passengers?
Until now it's secret where the two of the four wanted Boeings are and were the passengers of the Boeings are. It's clear that in the wholes of the WTC there were no Boeings. The military laboratories all declare that the passengers are dead but they have to be at another place because there were no Boeings at the WTC, and at the Pentagon and not either. So the passengers must be somewhere else. Is there a judge who can resolve this question? As long as the criminal Bush family with dominating the world with a "war against terror" there will be no tribunal and no judge checking out this question, and Bush himself is the main terrorist...
The lie of an airplane crash at Shanksville flight UA 93
The passengers of flight 93 are told having overwhelmed the hijackers, having made handy phone calls to their families on the ground and having made the airplane crash near Shanksville on the open ground in a meadow. But the circumstances are others:
Alleged official route of flight UA 93
Map: Alleged route of flight UA 93 heading for Cleveland (CLE).
Map: Alleged route of flight UA 93, allegedly the airplane turned back at Cleveland.
There is coming out an official report from a private TV station WCPO in Cincinnati, UA 93 had landed on Hopkins airport in Cleveland:
"[Mayor] White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of [Hopkins] Airport, and was evacuated. United identified the plane as Flight 93." WCPO-TV, Cincinnati, 9/11/01, 11:43:57.
[When one considers the CIA games with airplanes and passengers so it's logic that the regular flight had landed before the hairpin curve, and there was another airplane lifting off without passengers and with remote control].
The facts seem to confirm this:
-- there is nothing but a hole in the Earth and some broken trees, so the indications of photographer Chris Chaniki from a radio station at Pittsburgh to Fox News
At the "crater" of Shanksville the Boeing is missing
Shanksville: The alleged site of the crash of a Boeing, but the Boeing is missing.
Shanksville: Crater without any Boeing.
Shanksville: Photographer Chris Chaniki confirms: There is a crater but there is missing any part of any Boeing.
Air photo of the site of the Shanksville crater without any Boeing (red), supply channel (orange), alleged fire damage (green).
Red: This is officially said to be the crater of the crash where the Boeing of UA 93 allegedly had crashed upright into the soil.
Orange: Supply channel
Green: The alleged fire damage in the forest by the alleged explosion at the alleged Boeing crater.
[At the end all es "alleged"...]
-- Fox reporter: "It looks like there is nothing there except a hole in the ground."
-- Chris Chaniki: "Basically that's right. The only thing you can see from where we were was a big gall in the earth and some broken trees."
-- Chaniki: "There is nothing, nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there."
Reporter Chaniki about Shanksville: In Shanksville can be seen only dirt, ashes and some people walking around.
-- Chaniki: "There is nothing, nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there."
-- there is "no smoke, no fire" (Chaniki), no parts of an airplane, no rubble
-- the hole is 20 to 15 feet (6 to 10m) long, and about 10 feet (3m) wide
-- in the hole is only dirt and ashes and nothing else, and people are walking around.
More information about the lies about UA 93 at Shanksville one can get here e.g.:
"Did Flight 93 Crash in Shanksville?" http://www.killtown.911review.org/flight93.html
When an airplane crashes there must be bodies to be recovered. When coroner Wally Miller arrives, according to "Houston Chronicle" he cannot find any dead body and after 20 minutes he gives up his search
Miller to the Washington Post:
-- "It looked like someone took a scrap truck, dug a 10-foot ditch and dumped trash into it."
Miller goes on reporting to the Somerset County Coroner:
-- "It looked like somebody just dropped a bunch of metal out of the sky. I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there."
Coroner Wally Miller testifies about Shanksville to Sumerset County Coroner: "I stopped being coroner after about 20 minutes, because there were no bodies there."
Miller testifies about Shanksville to Pittsburgh Review clearly:
<"I have not, to this day, seen a single drop of blood. Not a drop."
Wally Miller, Somerset County Coroner>
So: It's the second time in World's history that an airplane shall have disappeared after a crash. But when a Boeing crashes on open field there is a big crater, and with separated big parts of the airplane lying around. Avery cites the airplane crash of a Boeing 737 in 2005 which was heading from Lagos to Abuja where was a big crater and the airplane was broken in many parts. Nigeria 2005, alleged crater by an alleged crash of a Boeing 737, TV picture.
[But also in the crater of Nigeria the Boeing is missing!
Nigeria 2005: There is a crater without Boeing again.
When one looks for the crater of the allegedly crashed Nigeria airplane of 2005 in the internet hardly photos of the crater can be found, and when there is a photo of the crater also there is missing the airplane:
The Western Swiss TV station tsr means about the photo: "On 22 October  a crash of a Boeing 737 caused 117 deads. [Keystone]" (orig.: "Le 22 octobre dernier, le crash d'un Boeing 737 faisait 117 mort. [Keystone]"
Well, where is the wreckage? I cannot see any. And where are the bodies and where is the luggage? I cannot see any! But for only some bribe Africans will do anything to do somebody a service or to make money, and the CIA with it's bribes is all over the world, and poor people are important for the CIA because they can be bribed easily and in case of doubt they do everything. By this Africa stays poor, the African governments sell their population for medical services to the "USA", and the African governments will be rich with it.
So, there was no airplane crash in Shanksville, but the airplane was hijacked and the passengers are in the "USA" in secret medical programs. There is no other solution].
The incidents at Hopkins airport in Cleveland - suspicion of hijacking of passengers
Two airplanes landing in Cleveland, one of it is flight UA 93
Landing of 2 airplanes on Hopkins airport in Cleveland
Landing of 2 airplanes on Hopkins airport in Cleveland. One of it is UA 93 which is performing an emergency landing because of an alleged "bomb threat". Text of the WCPO news, 11 September 2001, 11:43.
<A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport and was evacuated. United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did say how many people were aboard the flight.>
In Cleveland "something bigger" is prepared: Evacuation of the Hopkins Airport
At 10 o'clock the airport is evacuated. Rumors say that a hijacked airplane would land. The passengers in the airport hall have to leave the airport by foot and have to leave their cars at the airport. People in the buses have to stay in the buses and are forbidden to leave the bus. All freeway exits are closed. Bus drivers are forced under threat of death not to drive and to stay where they are. The guarding of the airport at Cleveland is totally.
11 September 2001, 10:00 o'clock: Evacuation and military occupation of Hopkins airport at Cleveland
Evacuation of Hopkins Airport at Cleveland with the indication that a hijacked airplane would land soon.
The evacuated from Hopkins Airport at Cleveland have to walk home: "People ... were forced to walk for miles ... because they were not even allowed to remove their cars."
Hopkins airport in Cleveland gets a military occupation and resistance will be threatened to be shot immediately:
<They closed all [freeway exits] and even bus drivers were told that if they [tried to leave], they would be shot.>
Associated Press and local Ohio newspapers report:
There lands an airplane. Delta Airlines confirms a landed flight of no. 1989 for 10:10. But also at 10:45 has landed an airplane. So, it was probably flight 93 which landed at 10:45.
But: Delta Airlines confirm the landing of a Delta airplane no. 1989 at Cleveland for 10:10 o'clock already. According to testimonies of persons concerned the Delta airplane was checked by the FBI with track dogs and the passengers were questioned for two hours separately.
At 10:45 o'clock another airplane is landing, probably it's flight 93. Since 10:45 o'clock there are two airplanes on the airport which have made an official emergency landing on Hopkins Airport at Cleveland.
Flight Delta 1989 - flight UA 93
News of AP at 10:45 that the Delta airplane on Hopkins Airport had no explosives on board.
At 10:45 there are two airplanes with an official emergency landing on Hopkins Airport at Cleveland: Delta 1989 and flight UA 93.
But the news of AP saying that the Delta airplane had been searched already is a lie. The truth is that the Delta airplane was arrested with its passengers for two hours in an isolated corner of the airplane.
Passenger: "Our plane was directed to an isolated area of the airport, and we waited for ever two hours in quarantine before FBI agents and bomb sniffing dogs came out to the plane."
The Delta airplane was de facto isolated in quarantine for two hours until the passengers could leave the airplane.
According to [local daily] "Adron Beacon" one of the airplanes is evacuated now, probably flight 93. Half an hour later the passengers are brought to a NASA center.
Cincinnati WCPO-TV reports Flight 93 safe
The local Cleveland television WCPO reports at 11:43 that flight 93 has landed at Cleveland. There had landed two airplanes at Cleveland Hopkins airport because of bomb threats, one of it is the airplane flight UA 93.
News of WCPO TV station: Mayor White indicates that the Boeing 767 from Boston had made an emergency landing because of a bomb threat and had been evacuated. UA identified the flight as UA 93.
<[Mayor] White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of [Hopkins] Airport, and was evacuated. United identified the plane as Flight 93.>
According to [local daily newspaper] "Plain Dealer" the Delta airplane is evacuated at 12:30. According to witnesses the Delta passengers were brought to the FAA headquarters.
And there is a confusion with the number of passengers to conceal UA 93:
The Mayor of Cleveland, White, maintains that from the Delta airplane had come 200 passengers. But a witness indicates only about 60 passengers for the Delta airplane. According to Avery it could be that the flight UA 93 had about 200 passengers. The authorities want to conceal this flight.
The passenger witness of the Delta flight indicates they had been evacuated to the FAA headquarter.
Other reports tell about an evacuation to the NASA research center in the evacuated Western part of the airport.
According to Avery it could be now that flight 93 had about 200 passengers, so all these passengers in the airplanes which allegedly had performed the attacks of 11 September.
Events in International Hopkins Airport at Cleveland
Delta Airlines 1989
Location of evacuation
NASA research center
Avery's conclusion is that all in all the four alleged hijacked Boeings of 11 September 2001 had about 200 passengers, and this is that much as UA 93 had in Cleveland after the emergency landing.
There is one big question: Where stay the approximately 200 passengers who were brought to the NASA center?
[The war regime of the criminal "president" Bush is mute, and no judge has got the courage to stand against the criminal Bush family despite of the clear evidences, witnesses, proofs and contradictions. Bush family can be compared well with a Saudi family...]
[There is e.g. a possibility that the "USA" have secret prisons and a pact with aliens working in the underground prisons with the human "material". So, the passengers could have become slaves in the underground prisons as a service for further weapon technology from the aliens to the "US" regime. This commerce between the "USA" and the negative aliens is working according to general known reports since 1946].
Bin Laden declares clearly he had nothing to do with the attacks of 11 September 2001
Where are the Boeings? - The "reports" of the 9-11 commission - flight recorders not found - and then had been found - two Boeings are flying yet!
[President Bush with it's proved blast of the WTC towers is a mass murder of about 2600 people. Now Bush tries to present proofs for the alleged Arab attacks and tries to conceal proofs of their own mass murder at WTC]:
Concealed proofs: What about the flight recorders? - an Arab passport
Flight recorders are made of the best material. The case absorbs any kind of impact to protect the data band. According to Ted Lopatkiewicz, speaker of the National Transportation Safety Board NTSB, the black boxes always had been found after an airplane crash in the "USA". But the 9-11 commission maintains that there had not been found one single flight recorder of the events of 11 September 2001.
Flight recorders of best material with buffered outside walls.
The investigating commission maintains there hasn't been found any flight recorder.
But a passport made of paper of Satam al Suqami is said having survived.
[According to Avery there should have been found flight recorders of little drones. But when these flight recorders would be found this would be the proof that there never had been any Boeing. So, it's better to find no flight recorder at all to stop any discussion].
According to the FBI all flight recorders should have been destroyed.
But then the FBI maintains having found the passport of Satam al-Suqami near the WTC. The passport should have thrown out of the airplane wreckage on to the street by the collapse of the tower. A passport should have survived the WTC collapse, but the flight recorders not. This lie of the "US" authorities under the Bush regime could hardly be bigger.
[There has to be said that the cleanup has assorted every detail of rubble. For example hard disks of computers could be found and were sent for examination and by the reconstructed data there could be proved that there were illegal finance channels before 11 September. But also these proofs are not worth a process until now...]
Then from one day to another firefighter Nicholas De Masi maintains in his book "Behind the Scenes - Ground Zero" that he had found three of four flight recorders together with federal agents in the WTC rubble.
<"At one point I was assigned to take Federal Agents around the site to search for the black boxes from the planes. There were a total of four. We found three."
Michael DeMasi, Behind the Scenes Ground Zero>
Firefighter Nicholas De Masi maintains he had found 3 of 4 flight recorders in the WTC rubble.
And now also the FBI maintains new things: FBI director Mueller maintains that they have the flight recorder of flight 77:
-- there is data material about height, speed and so on, but "nothing special"
-- there was no "other usable" data on the recorder.
FBI director Mueller maintains, on the flight recorder of flight 77 was no "other usable".
<FBI Director Robert Mueller said Flight 77 data recorder provided altitude, speed, headings and other information, but the voice recorder contained nothing useful.>
[This general statement of FBI Chief Mueller leads to the conclusion that the lie about flight 77 is absolutely great. What's next:]
About the cockpit recorder of flight 93 there are the following official indications:
-- this is the only evaluated cockpit voice recorder [and the martyrdom of the alleged fight on board of the airplane seems to fit into the concept of the Bush regime]
-- the tape is sent to the family members of the allegedly victims with the threat not to tell anything, they are not even allowed to write something
-- the last 3 minutes are missing for any reason.
The flight recorder of flight 93 shall allegedly confirm the martyrdom of the passengers.
And by this there are new contradictions:
-- the 9-11 commission shall have concealed the founded WTC flight recorders, why?
-- why maintained FBI chief Mueller there would have been "nothing useful" in the flight recorder from flight 77?
-- and where are the last 3 minutes from flight 93? Where are they?
-- and why the Bush regime is silent?
[This global statement of FBI boss Mueller gives the indication that there was no flight recorder of flight 77 at all but all is invented and a big lie].
Two of four airplane numbers are in use until now
According to Federal Air Aviation FAA the airplane numbers from
-- flight UA 93 (airplane no. N591UA) (allegedly crashed near Shanksville)
-- and flight UA 175 (airplane no. N612UA) (with the allegedly crash into the South Tower)
are "listed as valued aircraft" until now.
Airplanes from American Airlines (AA) and United Airlines (UA)
The airplanes from United Airlines (UA) are all listed as "valued" yet.
The airplanes from United Airlines (UA) are all listed as "valued" yet.
Only flight AA11 (WTC 1) and flight AA77 (Pentagon) are listed as destroyed.
But it's even more extreme that the two destroyed airplanes are not scheduled for 9-11 2001.
[How many lies mass murder Bush, his family and CIA with FBI want to put into the World yet? Bush is worse than Johnson and Nixon together, and the blind judges, payed by "American" tax payer, believe mass murder Bush. How stupid these "American" tax payers are...]
Mobile phone calls from flying airplanes are impossible in 2001
Listening to the maintained cell phone calls the conversation is only some minutes long and no panic in the background can be heard. And the indicated seat rows do not match to the passenger lists. So also by this there is another heavy indication that all cell phone calls from flying airplanes of 11 September are a lie.
Cell phone calls from airliners during the flight are not possible without extra antenna.
Mobile phone calls from a flying airplane to the Earth are not possible without special antenna on the airplane. Key Dewdney from the Organization "Physics911" makes an investigation with cell phones in a Cessna 172 in different heights of flight. On 1,200 m (4,000 feet) 40 % of the connections were working, on 2,500 m (8,000 feet) only 10 %. The airliners fly normally on 32,000 feet. So the calculation is clear that there is a probability of 0.6 % for a connection by mobile phone in an airliner, according to Dewdney.
Kee Dewdney from "Physics911" made an investigation about cell phone connections in airplanes.
The success rate to install a connection by mobile phone in a height of an airliner (32,000 feet) is 0.6 percent.
The airplanes get this technique only since 2004, at American Airlines (AA) officially e.g. the first time is 15 July 2004. Why should AA spend so much money for expensive technology when the mobile phones should have worked well on 11 September 2001 already? So all handy phone calls from flying airplanes to the Earth on 11 September 2001 are a lie.
Reports about the new technology for mobile phone calls in airplanes of AA 2004.
But it's well possible to forge telephone calls with a voice computer with a new voice technology which is used in the laboratories of Los Alamos in New Mexico since 1999. 10 minutes of a voice are enough to falsify a speech or a telephone call...
Language laboratory with voice computer in Los Alamos 1999 to clone voices.
For a complete falsification of a voice one needs only 10 minutes recorded voice.
The surviving, alleged "assailants" - absolutely false blame of the Bush regime against Arabs without any proof
[One has to know in this case that Ministry of Justice of the "USA" is in Jewish hands, collaborating with Wiesenthal center of Los Angeles with orthodox Jews, and with Jewish secret service Mosad. These people are managing "USA" against the Arabs now and want to provoke a new World War to have a bigger Israel at the end against the Arabs. Here are the trials of diffamation against the Arabs]:
On 23.9.2001 BBC reports that the alleged "assailant" Waleed Al Shehri is living safe in Morocco, and the same situation is given for Abdulaziz Alomari, an engineer of Saudi Telecom.
All in all at least 9 alleged assailants come up living safe:
At least 9 of the alleged assailants come up again living and safe.
-- Waleed Al Shehri
"[Waleed] ... attended flight training school at Dayton Beach in the United States ... but he left the United States in September 2000 to become a pilot with Saudi Arabian Airlines."
Waleed Al Shehri lives in Morocco -- Abulaziz Alomari is an engineer working at Saudi Telecoms
Abdulaziz Alomari lives also after 11 September 2001
-- Wail M. Alshehri: lives on also after 11 September 2001
Wail M. Alshehri is living also after 11 September 2001
-- Mohand Alshehri: lives in Saudi Arabia also after 11 September 2001, full text
<According to The Orlando Sentinel, the Saudi Arabian embassy confirmed that ... Mohand Alshehri ... [is] not dead and had nothing to do with [9-11].>
-- Khalid Almihdhar: living as computer program creator at Mecca also after 11 September 2001, full text
<"I want to think all this is a mistake." Almihdhar was watching TV at home when friends saw his photograph on the news and began to call to see if he was still alive.
Chicago Tribune, 4 October 2001>
-- Salem Alhazmi: working at a chemistry site in Saudi Arabia, also after 11 September 2001, full text
<Salem Al-Hazmi is alive and ... not one of the people who perished in [Flight 77]. His passport had been stolen by a pickpocket in Cairo three years ago.
The Guardian, 21 September 2001>
-- Saeed Alghamdi: passes a pilot education in Tunis, lives also after 11 September 2001, full text
<"The FBI provided no evidence of my involvement in the attacks. You can't imagine what it's like to be described as a [dead terrorist] when you are innocent and alive."
The Telegraph, 23 September 2001>
-- Ahmed Alnami: is supervisor for Saudi Airlines, and lives also after 11 September 2001, full text
<"I'm still alive. I had never even heard of Pennsylvania." He never lost his passport and found it very worrying that his identity appeared to have been stolen.
The Telegraph, 23 September 2001>
-- and eventually also Mohammed Atta is living yet, because his father indicates that after 11 September his son called him by telephone on 12 September, full text.
Indication of Atta's father: <Atta said he hadn't heard from his son since [9/12/2001], and that he has never called his son since his departure in 1993. "He calls us. We don't even have his number."
The Cairo Times, Volume 5, Issue 29>
FBI chief Mueller admits at 20 and 27 September 2001 in CNN that there is
"no legal proof to prove the identities of the hijackers."
FBI director Mueller admits two times that there is no legal proof for the identity of the assailants.
An official list of the assailant's autopsy of flight 77 does not exist.
There is a list of passengers declares dead of flight 77, but an official autopsy of the assailants of flight 77 does not exist...
The truth is that these passengers are probably kept in secret prisons of CIA and the passengers are used there for medical experiments...
[The secret services of the Stupid States - all these secret services are from justice department and are in the hands of Jewish Zionists - all these secret services have a huge criminal fantasy presenting false videos, here in this case against Bin-Laden]:
So, also by the FBI there is no evidence that the assailants come from Al Kaida.
An official autopsy list of the assailants of flight 77 is not existing.
[So, why is there the prison in Guantanamo? Only for blaming Arabs who are innocent].
Alleged Bin Laden videos
On 14 December 2001 there is e.g. a Bin Laden video published. It is said being made in Afghanistan and being found at Jalalabad, and it's said Bin Laden had admitted he was the organizing figure of the attacks of 11 September 2001. There is an alleged Bin Laden confession video.
But the analysis says other things:
-- the video is of absolutely poor quality
-- the figure and the behavior of the speaking person is not matching to Bin Laden
An alleged Bin Laden video without any quality...
-- according to the indications of the FBI website Bin Laden is left handed According to the FBI website Bin Laden is a clear "left handed" person.
-- but the speaking person on the video which should be Bin Laden is right handed and is writing and eating with the right hand
Alleged Bin Laden video: Right handed person writes with right hand.
Alleged Bin Laden video: Right handed person is eating with right hand.
Alleged Bin Laden video: Right handed person is drinking with right hand.
Why the "American" population should believe that Al Quaeda would be behind the attacks of 11 September when all evidences and proofs are against this saying?
"Until the government can prove without any doubt that Al Quaeda is behind the 11 September the people of the USA has any right to believe the contrary."
Avery: No proof for Al Quaeda (1)
Avery: No proof for Al Quaeda (2)
General attorney Olson justifies the false information of the Bush regime with "vital interest"...
<"It's easy to imagine an infinite number of situations where the government might legitimately give out false information. It's an unfortunate reality that the issuance of incomplete information and even misinformation by government may sometimes be perceived as necessary to protect vital interests."
Solicitor General Theodore Olson, whose wife Barbara was killed on September 11th, 2001>
[Well, Barbara Olson is perhaps still alive, but in an underground prison of NASA research center. But: Before 9-11 Bin Laden was a friendly nursed person in "American" hospitals, and Bin Laden got visits from the CIA. Why should he be a terrorist now against "America"? This does not match together. But there is another subject provoking the blasts of 11 September 2001: There are money and gold]:
The profit by the events of 11 September 2001 - analysis of hard disks by Convar - the FBI does not investigate the insider trade
-- now, Silverstein - the tenant of WTC - wants 7 bn. $ compensation and first gets only 3.55 bn. on 2 December 2004, [because justice says that the attacs on WTC are only one single damage event, then he gets what he wants, and in October 2006 a last instance decides that the attacs on WTC ware two damage events, so he got 7 bn. $, from German Allianz] Silverstein wants 7.2 bn. Dollar, article
-- the stock exchange speculators with their put options on United Airlines (UA) have left put option profits of 2.5 million dollars on the stock exchange. Share profits of 2.5 million dollars with put options on UA are not taken since 11 September 2001.
"Investors have yet to collect more than $2.5 million in profits they made trading options in the stock of United Airlines before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, according to a source familiar with the trades and market data."
Share profits of 2.5 million dollars with put options on UA are not taken since 11 September 2001, full text of the article.
What went wrong here so?
Proofs for insider trading are not pursued by the FBI
In the WTC rubble hard disks of computers are found. The computer company Convor can recover data on these damaged hard disks.
Convar company, logo
Hard disks from the WTC rubble: The data
can partly be reconstructed.
By this research Convar finds evidence for insider trading on 32 hard disks.
Convar saves data from 32 computer hard disks from the WTC rubble, article.
Richard Wagner from Convor says:
<$100 million might have been made immediately before and during the disaster. "There is a suspicion that some people had advance knowledge of the approximate time of the plane crashes in order to move out amounts exceeding $100 million," he says. "They thought that the records of their transactions could not be traced after the main frames were destroyed.>
Richard Wagner from Convar: There is a strong suspicion for insider trade with a damage sum of over 100 million dollars, article.
Then Convor gives the research results to the FBI and the FBI is doing nothing whereas it would be obliged to pursue the cases.
Convar hands over the data to the FBI but the FBI does not act.
[and whereas the "American" tax payers are financing the FBI in the name of the constitution. How stupid the "American" tax payers are, but the real connection is the following: The speculators in the WTC were Jewish banks, and justice ministery in the "USA" is in Jewish hands, and a Jew will not persue a Jew when there is profit...]
[And when it's possible to reconstruct data on hard discs from the WTC rubble which had no buffered case, why shouldn't it be possible to reconstruct data from flight recorders which were in a buffered case?
But the Bush regime has not finished with it's lies yet...]
Gold in the WTC for 1 bn. $ - gold of a value of 800 million $ is declared missing
Where is all the gold of the WTC?
The Jewish banks in the WTC had gold deposits in the cellar floors of the WTC. The amount of gold in the WTC on 9-11 2001 is concealed by the Bush regime.
The Bush regime only admits that the value of the gold in the basement of the WTC would exceed the value of the gold in 1993 of over 1 bn. Dollar.
Report of the news agendy CNS about gold stores in the WTC 1993 during the first attack against the WTC.
1993 there was Kuwait gold stored of over 1 bn. Dollar value under the WTC.
The value of gold in the WTC from 11 September 2001 is never published.
Avery indicates there had been stored gold for another billion Dollar in the WTC.
Then it's maintained that a big part of the gold would have been found in the rubble. Giuliani maintains that a part of the gold of a value of over 230 million $ had been found on Ground Zero.
Report from Times Online on 1st November 2001 about the recovery of gold under the WTC
Giuliani, Mayor of New York admits the recovery of gold under the WTC of a value of over 230 million dollars.
But the big part of the gold is not found any more and seems to be stolen. One only can estimate the damage until today. The Comex Metal Commercial Board e.g. had stored gold in the WTC
-- for the Manhattan Bank
-- for the Bank of New York and Hongkong
-- for the Shanghai Bank
in a value of 950 million $
Gold store of Comex Metal in the WTC on 11 September 2001, text.
Only the gold storage of Comex has got a value of 950 million dollars, text.
<The Comex metals trading division of the New York Mercantile Exchange kept 3,800 gold bars -- weighing 12 tonnes and worth more than $100 million (£70 million) -- in vaults in the building's basement. Comex also held almost 800,000 ounces of gold there on behalf of others with a value of about $220 million. It also held more than 102 million ounces of silver, worth $430 million.>
<The Bank of Nova Scotia, which kept gold in the Comex vault, reported $200 million of gold lost in the wreckage. Comex also held precious metals for Chase Manhattan Bank, the Bank of New York and Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking.>
But Comex Metal is only one company of many companies which had gold stored in the WTC basement. So, where is all the gold?
The gold which was found in November 2001 was found by removal workers in intact tunnel systems in lorries well prepared which were full of gold. Avery:
"Gold from [the building] WTC 4 was found under [the building] WTC 5 in empty lorries together with escort cars."
It can be admitted that the vehicles were stationed in direction away from the South Tower.
Reuters reports the recovery of gold from building WTC 4 on lorries and in cars in supply tunnels under WTC building 5.
WTC gold in a supply tunnel under WTC building 5.
WTC buildings 4 and 5, and beneath there is a WTC "looted gold path".
The drivers let be the gold loot from WTC 4 under WTC 5 and as it seems they fled
The recovery place is strictly closed off by FBI and CIA with armed forces. The removal workers have no access. The gold is brought away under security patrols by 100 armed officers.
According to Avery it can be admitted that the vehicles were in a position leaving the WTC South Tower. It seems the drivers left their vehicles with the gold in a hurry. So, there is another question: Why did the drivers know that they had to leave the loot and had to make off, when even the firefighters did not know that the tower would be blasted? Why did they leave the loot there?
On 11 September gold of a value of over 1 bn. $ had been stored in the WTC. Until today only gold of a value of 200 million $ has been covered up.
[It seems that the drivers knew that the towers should be blasted...]
[And there is another question: Who organized the loot of gold at the WTC? Did mass murder Bush give gold to his friends to bribe the members of the government to bring them to his heel for his wars? And how much was it?]
[But there is also another possibility: The banks at the WTC could have had pre-knowledge of the 9-11 events, and they would have drawn back all gold and after the crash would maintain that their gold is missing].
Dylan Avery's balance:
In the WTC of the 11 September 2001 was gold in a value of at least 1 bn. $. Until now only gold of 200 million $ has been recovered.
[There is no investigation until now.. It can be admitted that the whole Department of Justice and the whole media apparatus of the World is bribed by the Bush regime. There was looted enough gold for that...]
Censorship and tyranny of the Bush regime since 11 September 2001
The Bush regime is ordering censorship over the whole country:
-- with a new law "Patriot Act"
-- with a new board "Home protection board"
-- with wars in Afghanistan and in Iraq [with more "American" dead victims that on 9-11].
Bush after the 11 September 2001 plays as he would be very "concerned"
Little Bush signing the "Patriot Act", a muzzle for the people and the media.
Little Bush founds the "Home Security Board", a "patriotic" job program for the people...
Little Bush sends Americans to Afghanistan to "defend America" there...
Little Bush sends Americans to Iraq to "defend America" in Iraq...
The 11 September 2001 is a pretext for wars with over 100,000s of dead victims.
The 11 September is - when one considers all connections with all proofs that the Bush regime is the culprit - a huge lie with consequently 100,000s of victims and profits of billions of $ [and mass looting]. All research for the truth is boycotted and made ridiculous by the Bush regime and by the media. Every critic is named a "fool".
[and in the prison in Guantanamo are innocent Muslims. It seems there is a big bribe executed since 2002 because in 2001 the media were very critical against the criminal Bush regime yet].
The media dictatorship in the "USA" against any proof for 11 September 2001 - keyword: "Conspiracy theory"
Example: Fox News wants to stamp Prof. Barrett of the university of Madison (Wisconsin) as a conspirator
-- Fox News is the greatest hip of extremists
-- one should take you from the radio because of high treason.
The former Bush employee Morgan Reynolds says in public:
"The Bush government has blasted the towers beyond."
Barrett: "America has been hijacked."
Avery: 11 September 2001 "was a psychological attack on the American people and it was pulled off with military precision."
Here is an example how proofs of the "US" media are made ridiculous. University professor Kevin Barret says to Fox News:
Fox News names Prof. Barret from Madison University (Wisconsin) as a theorist of conspiracy who would give lessons to dependent pupils.
Prof. Barrett says, the proofs for the controlled blast of the WTC towers [and of building 7] are bone-crushing
Prof. Barrett: "After I studied the fact for two years I am convinced that this [the attacks of 11 September 2001] was an inside job [of the Bush regime]."
Prof. Barrett says, he would not be obliged to believe that the WTC towers were blasted, but with the proofs he knows it
Prof. Barrett: "I don't believe, [but] I know it that the 11 September was an inside job [of the Bush regime]."
Prof. Barrett: "Prof. Steven Jones found residues of termite [explosive to melt steel] on the WTC."
Prof. Barrett to Fox reporter John Hannity: "We know now that this [the WTC with it's towers and building 7] was removed in a controlled demolition."
Fox-reporter John Hannity: "You believe that the buildings were coming down in a controlled demolition?"
Prof. Barrett: "I don't believe it - I know it. The proofs are overwhelming."
Prof. Barrett calls on the whole world to study the proofs that the Bush regime is the culprit of 11 September 2001. "I call on all to look at the proofs themselves."
Prof. Barrett: "Go on www.st911.org "Scholars for 9/11 truth". Prof. Barrett cites the former Bush staff member Morgan Reynolds who said in public:
"The Bush government has sent the towers to kingdom com."
Prof. Barrett accuses Fox News: "Your theory is bizarre: 19 types with carpet knives..."
Prof. Barrett about Fox News: "This is the craziest conspiracy theory of all."
Now Fox News tries to doubt Prof. Barretts' competence
Fox reporter John Hannity doubts the competence of Prof. Barrett: "Are you even competent to give lessons to them [to the students]?"
Prof. Barrett says that according to a poll at Madison University Prof. Barrett is accepted by 90 % of all students to go on with giving lessons
Prof. Barrett says that 60 % on the university believe that the 11 September 2001 was a controlled demolition.
Prof. Barrett is recognized at Madison University: "Yes, we had a poll here and 90 % said I should go on with giving lessons."
And also the proofs that the Bush regime is the culprit for the 11 September get a recognition in a mayor part of the members of the university: "And 60 % accord with me what concerns the 9-11."
Fox News alleges Prof. Barrett "extreme views"
Fox- reporter John Hannity means Prof. Barret should not spread this kind of extreme views: "This [the university] is not the appropriate forum for people who have such extreme views like you."
Prof. Barrett means Fox News is the biggest heap of extremists
Prof. Barrett counters against the censored Fox News: "You are extreme. Fox News is the biggest heap of extremists." [with impossible theories with carpet knives and false films with Boeing impacts with empty holes].
Fox News maintains that Prof. Barrett should not give lessons any more
Fox reporter John Hannity means about Prof. Barrett: "You are an extremist and not the right man to give lessons."
Prof. Barrett means that Fox News should at last stop to spread hatefulness all over the country
Prof. Barrett comments about Fox reporter Hannity: "But you are the right man to spread hatefulness all over the country."
Prof. Barret: You should be stopped in the aether because of high treason
Prof. Barrett is tired of the censored Fox News: "You should be taken from the aether because of high treason [on the "American" people].
Scholars symposium for the truth about 11 September 2001
Scholars symposium because of the projected 5 years jubilee of 11 September 2001 in 2006
Scholars symposium: The lie has to be discovered on 5th anniversary.
Conclusion by Avery: "America has been hijacked."
[by Jewish Zionist banks, by the Department of Justice in the "USA" which is occupied only by Jews, in colaboration with criminal Bush family]
Avery: "America was hijacked"
Avery's demand, put your questions
Links about proofs that the Bush regime is the culprit of 11 September 2001
-- proofs for the impossibility of the attacks with Boeing airplanes: http://killtown.911review.org/
-- the muzzle strategy since 11 September 2001: http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html
-- Pentagon especially without airplane: http://www.pentagonresearch.com/
-- about the "American" policy since 1776 in connection with Israel until 2006: http://www.serendipity.li
-- website of the truth movement: http://www.911blogger.com
Films about proofs that the Bus regime is the culprit of 11 September 2001 and the terror after it
-- 9/11: Road to Tyranny
-- Martial Law
-- Terror Storm
-- In Plane Site
-- the Greatest Lie Ever SeenLoose Change contains only one part of the proofs. There are more sources with proofs to see.
see also: http://www.loosechange911.com/:
In the "USA" there is a spread truth movement "9/11 truth movement".
Conclusion by Michael Palomino: We need a court of justice at Den Haag against the "USA" and against the Bush regime
The collapse of the WTC was a well planned demolition and a huge crime.
President George W. Bush is the main responsible and with this he is the direct murder of 2749 WTC dead victims altogether with his brother Marvin Bush, the responsible for the safety in the WTC. They have both abused their offices for a destructive act in their own country mass murder inclusive. After that president Bush has begun several wars without any reason and accepted all dead victims in Afghanistan war and in Iraq war, and these dead victims are on his guilt. At the same time there was probably distributed robbed looted gold from WTC of a value of several 100 million Dollar to bribe the people on the Bush regime's side.
All blamed Arab states are innocent.
Bin Laden is not a culprit but he is a theater figure of the criminal Bush regime.
President Bush is the biggest looser of the world history
because all the high armed "US" army cannot get Bin Laden, since appr. 10 years.
It seems the demolition of the WTC was also interesting for some Jewish groups because Jews were working in the WTC but none of them is dead. One single Jew died on 11 September 2001 in the WTC, it was a Jewish tourist.
And it seems that little Arab groups exist which want to have the "USA" in Afghanistan and in Iraq to have the "USA" in other Vietnam traps. So the demolition of the WTC was interesting for the Arab groups. There were Arab school classes who knew of the projected demolition. They took photo cameras with them on that day to take a photo of the burning towers from the classroom.
And the mass murder Bush sends his troupes into the traps, and the stupid "American" tax payer is financing this nonsense.
President Bush and his brother Marvin Bush are guilty for mass murder on the WTC.
President Bush is guilty having initiated the war in Afghanistan and in Iraq as well he is guilty for all dead victims in the wars in Afghanistan and in Iraq.
The Bush regime is guilty of damage to property at the WTC and at the Pentagon.
The Bush regime is guilty of heavy defamation against 19 Arabs.
The Bush regime is not willing to question 1,000s of witnesses of 11 September 2001 until now.
The Bush regime probably also robbed the masses of gold in the WTC and with this is also guilty of the mass looting. When it was not the Bush regime so the banks in the WTC had reported the loss of the gold which already was transported away. This would be another fraud.
For such a high treason the "American" law simply foresees only one penalty: The death penalty for the whole Bush regime.
But the whole world lets trick itself and does not see that the wholes in the WTC are empty.
At the same time President Bush is playing the "week man" with always new speeches against Al Quaeda and against Bin Laden. But there was not one single Boeing stuck in the WTC towers and not one single tail part of a Boeing was stuck in the towers, and the FBI and the judges in the "USA" - financed by "American" tax payers - they are sleeping on and on and are not doing anything as all would be in order.
The suspicion of a massive bribe of the whole state apparatus of the Bush regime is not far so.
The wars initiated by the Bush regime have demonstrable false war reasons. We need an international justice system against the Bush regime because Bush's wars are international causes, because Bush has involved the whole NATO in his wars, because he called for the alliance case, because Bush's wars are a total violation of human rights. We need an international justice against the Bush regime so the world terror of the Bush regime would stop. This will only be possible with an international court at Den Haag, with a court against the "USA".
There is also the question how far the New Yorker Mayor Giuliani was involved into the plans to blast the WTC towers.
The proofs is clear: There were controlled demolitions of the WTC towers and of WTC building 7, a Cruise Missile at the Pentagon and a little crater with some rubble at Shanksville.
All four Boeings are missing. The passengers live but nobody knows where they are
We need a court in Den Haag against the criminal and lying Bush regime. In the "USA" for mass murder is given the death penalty.
And there is another mass murder of the Bush regime: New Orleans was not protected by water gates because of the resolutions of the Bush regime. But for his wars the Bush regime has got any money. So, also the 1,500 dead victims of hurricane Katrina in New Orleans in the year 2005 are fully a guilt of the criminal Bush regime.
Where is the class action? Where is a court against the "USA"? Where is a judge?
Photo sources for photos from other sources than the film "Loose Change 2"
-- General Lemnitzer: http://www.nato.int/multi/photos/1963/m630102a.htm
-- NASA logo: http://adc.gsfc.nasa.gov/adc/adc_science/adc-science-guide.html
-- precise demolition of WTC building no. 7, film: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=148667&Disp=All
-- WTC fire 1975: http://www.total911.info/2005/04/1975-wtc-fire-burned-six-floors-for.html
-- burning skyscraper in Madrid: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=148667&Disp=All
-- Marvin Bush on a walk with George W.Bush and women and dog:
-- Marvin Bush, portrait: http://911fraud.blogspot.com/
-- Dr. Griffin at a speech: http://www.apfn.org/old/apfncont.htm
-- empty hole in the WTC North Tower: http://www.inode1.com/wtc/g/index.cgi?mode=album&album=./Time_Magazine_Special_Edition
-- airplane on the way to the impact WTC South Tower, TV film:
-- airplane shortly before the impact into WTC South Tower, TV film: http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~johnm/South-Tower-Photos.html
-- cloud: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/photos/wtc2hit12.html (June 2005)
-- hole in WTC South Tower without Boeing: http://www.gallerize.com/9-11_Hole_Science.htm
-- Shanksville: Crater without Boeing: http://nineeleven2001.t35.com/images/index.html
-- Shanksville alleged crash site, air photo: http://www.killtown.911review.org/images/flight93/aerial-diagram.jpg
-- crater without Boeing in Nigeria: