from:
Gerhard Wisnewski: Lügen im Weltraum [Lies in Space];
Knaur 2006
The development of the atmosphere crafts
"Gemini"
One can see that "SU" "Vostok" atmosphere craft was
much bigger than "US" "Mercury", and "US" "Gemini" is
about as big as "SU" "Vostok".
 Scheme
with the comparison of Vostok, Mercury and
Gemini atmosphere crafts |
|
The impossible landing data from the Gemini
missions since Gemini 6A
NASA claims
that missions with Gemini atmosphere ships had
been circling around the earth. But according to
the landing data of the landing capsules all
Gemini missions since Gemini 6A are a fake because
the landings since Gemini 6A are much too precise
to be real landings from an Earth orbit. Real
landings from an Earth orbit mostly have an
aberration of 100s up to 1,000s of km also in a
very precise working team, and a precise landing
can be only a lucky chance. But the Gemini flights
since Gemini 6A are regularly this precise that
they can only be explained by airdrops as it was
made in training 1,000s of times.
(In: Kaysing, Bill: We Never
Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar
Swindle; Pomeroy 2002; Wisnewski, p.237-243).
[Add to this the "USA" wanted to
be brilliant against the "SU" with "precise
landings", and the media never want to have
recognized the manipulations...]
Gemini landing data
|
| Date of landing |
Atmosphere ship
landed |
Aberration from
the foreseen landing point |
| 16 Feb 1965 / 2-16-1965 |
Gemini 6A |
12.9 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| 18 Dec1965 / 12-18-1965 |
Gemini 7 |
11.8 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| 17 March 1966 / 3-17-1966 |
Gemini 8 |
2
kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| 6 June 1966 / 6-6-1966 |
Gemini 9A |
0.7 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| 21 July 1966 / 7-21-1966 |
Gemini 10 |
6.2 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| 15 Sep 1966 / 9-15-1966 |
Gemini 11 |
4.9 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| 15 Nov 1966 / 11-15-1966 |
Gemini 12 |
4.8 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
These Gemini landing data are from Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.com:
Splashdown, August 2006).
It's not strange that the CIA
headquarters are situated at the same place as
one of the simulation centers: at Langley...
Faked moon fotos
from faked "moon probes" "Surveyor"
Surveyor 1: Alleged "moon landing" 30 May 1966
/ 5-30-1966
Surveyor 2: Alleged "moon landing" 17 April
1967 / 4-17-1967
Surveyor 3: Alleged "moon landing" 8 Sep 1967
/ 9-8-1967
Surveyor 4: Alleged "moon landing" 7 Nov 1967
/ 11-7-1967
Surveyor 5: Alleged "moon landing" 7 Jan 1968
/ 1-7-1968
All in all the Surveyor moon probes shall have
transmitted over 85,000 fotos from the moon
over a distance of 380,000 km to the Earth
(Wisnewski, p.216).
But
only considering the radio transmitting
connection over this distance through the
radioactive belts seems impossible. And NASA
historian James R. Hansen reveals in his
book "Spaceflight Revolution" the fraud
directly unmasking alleged foto of surveyor
as pictures from the moon simulation device
"LOLA". The alleged first foto of an "Earth
rise" (foto no. I-102H2) is in reality the
foto L-66-6399.66 ("L" stands for Langley,
the simulation center near Hampton in
Virginia).
(Wisnewski, p.286-288).
[So
there is the question if also all other
"moon probes" are a fake, also these of the
"Soviet Union". Because a radio transmitting
connection of over 380,000 km seems
absolutely doubtful and is also non
controllable, and considering the rotation
of the Earth, sch a connection is absolutely
impossible. And at the same time NASA is
numbering all their "photos" simulating a
"scientific" manner of working, and the
stupid media are believing this...].
But artificial moon surfaces are very real,
according to NASA historian Hanson. Moon
surfaces can be easily imitated,
(In:
Hansen, James R.: Spaceflight Revolution,
SP-4308, p.375; Internet edition,
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/contents.htm;
Wisnewski, p.284-285)
and artificial moon surfaces can also be
published on fotos very well and in fuzzy
films as a "real moon surface". And the stupid
media believe all, to rise their numbers of
copies...
The money is in power - the truth is
loosing...
Picture sources
-- comparison
Vostok-Mercury-Gemini: Brian Jones: Weltraumforschung;
Herder-Verlag 1990, p.47
--
Gemini 6A and 7 rendezvous with parts of the training
hall in the foto, foto no. S65-63189:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_40.html;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001049.jpg
--
Gemini 7 on an Earth orbit, lie: foto no.: S65-63194:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_138.html;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2006-000035.jpg
-- Gemini 9A splashdown, foto no.
66C-5085:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_37.html;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001021.jpg
-- Gemini 10
splashdown, foto no. 66C-6532:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_35.html;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-000995.jpg
--
Gemini Titan 11 start, foto no. 66PC-0261:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_37.html;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001020.jpg
--
Gemini 12 splashdown, foto no. 66C-9516:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_35.html;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-000994.jpg
-- Gemini Mission Control Center has
no idea of the fakes, foto no.: S65-28660:
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/BROWSE/ALLGRIN_65.html;
http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001405.jpg
^
