from:
-- Gerhard Wisnewski: Lügen im Weltraum [Lies in Space];
Knaur 2005
-- web sites
The alleged "reflectors"
installed "on the moon"
"On the moon" there is said there are installed some
"reflectors" from the "USA" and from the "Soviet Union".
The data about the installed reflectors and the
availability are the following:
16 to 24 July 1969
"USA": Apollo 11 is said to
have set up a reflector "on the moon" of 46 by 46 cm
(Wisnewski, p.208, 218)
Laser reflector of Apollo 11
|
 Laser
reflector of Apollo 11, 46 by 46 cm, hardly bigger
than a laptop [1]
|
Apollo 11
Foto-Nr. AS11-40-5952HR: Laser reflector 46 by
46 cm on the "moon surface" in the moon hall.
The reflector seems to be too big, the shadow
seems to be too long, and foot prints around the
reflector are missing. So, the photo is an
incomplete photo composition from the NASA phot
studio in Langley... [2]
|
10 Nov 1970
"SU": "Lunar probe " Luna 17
(Lunik 17) starts and is said to have set up a reflector
"on the moon"
(Wisnewski, p.219)
The big apparatus of the "Soviet" atmosphere flight has
four ramps on which the freight is loaded. The "moon
robot" "Lunokhod" can be steered down by radio
communication and is said to perform experiments and
analyzes.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_17
(August 2006)
"Lunar probe" Luna with "moon robot"
Lunochod / Lunokhod
|
Luna 17, drawing with the "moon
robot" "Lunokhod" ("Lunochod") at the top [3]
|
"Landing" of
the "Lunar probe" with one single engine
[impossible], an then the "moon robot" "Lunochod"
/ "Lunokhod" is said to be steered by radio
communication from the Earth over a distance of
380,000 km [also impossible] [4]
|
|
Lunochod /
Lunokhod on the bearing probe, the ramps are set
down. But how shall this thing have flown with
only one engine and have landed on the moon by
remote control from the Earth without a crash? [5]
|
In the "Lunokhod" there is a retro laser
reflector.
(http://cr4.globalspec.com/article.pl?sid=06/07/20/167247)
The reflector of Luna 17 is said to have never
functioned.
(http://www.mondlandung.pcdl.de/prolandung/index_pro.htm)
|
|
Lunochod / Lunokhod with a round reflector which
can be expanded [6]
|
31 Jan -9 Feb 1971
"USA": Apollo 14 is said to
have set up a reflector 46 by 46 cm "on the moon"
(Wisnewski, p.208, 218)
|
|
Apollo 14
foto no. AS14-67-9386: Laser reflector 46 by 46 cm
on the "moon surface" in the moon hall [7] |
26 July -7 Aug 1971
"USA": Apollo 15 is said to
have set up a reflector 104 by 61 cm "on the moon"
(Wisnewski, p.218).
[With this reflector on the "lunar surface" there is no
good photo available].
8 Jan 1973
"SU": "Lunar probe" Luna 21
starts and is said to have set up a reflector "on the
moon"
(Wisnewski, p.219).
The "Lunar probe" has - like Luna 17 - a "moon robot" on
board, a "Lunochod", with an integrated retro laser
reflector.
(http://cr4.globalspec.com/article.pl?sid=06/07/20/167247)
This reflector is said to be functioning. Until now (2006)
the three reflectors of the Apollo "missions" and the Luna
21 reflector "Lunochod" are officially set up on the "moon
surface" and are said to "function".
(http://www.mondlandung.pcdl.de/prolandung/index_pro.htm)
[But the problem of an impossible radio communication over
a distance of 380,000 km and of an impossible landing of
the Luna probes by an impossible radio communication is
never mentioned...]
According to Wisnewski it's absolutely nonsense why the
"Soviets" would set up reflectors on the moon when Apollo
is setting up some reflectors already, because the "rear
reflectors" are reflecting without ideology. Why shall be
wasted freight weight when Apollo had done this work? This
doubled work seems to be suspicious (Wisnewski, p.219).
[Perhaps the reflectors on the moon become also fragile on
the moon because of the exposure to the temperatures of
plus 200°C and minus 200°C, or they are covered with dust,
or they are overwhelmed? Are there long time tests with
reflectors? Any speculation is possible...].
The impossible locating of
the little reflectors
The reflectors are said to have been set up "on the moon"
to measure better the distance between Earth and moon. But
the reflectors are not more than good "rear reflectors".
And when there would really set up these little reflectors
on the moon so it would not be possible to locate them,
because on a distance of 380,000 km a laser beam is 7 km
large, and after the reflexion on the moon surface the
laser beam is 20 km large.
(In: Deiss,
Dr. Bruno: Laser-Reflektor-Experimente [Laser reflector
experiments];
www.planetenkunde.de/m001/m001000/m001_x01.htm; Wisnewski,
p.218).
Some sources
indicate also a surface of 20 km2
(Wisnewski, p.376).
|
|
|
This
should be a laser beam measuring the distance
between moon and Earth for several hours by
reflection of a reflector set up "on the moon"
for distance measuring [8]
|
Some sources
maintain that it would be possible with a laser beam to
measure the distance between moon and Earth with an
accuracy of 3 cm, when the measuring would last several
hours to get a precise result. So it would not be
important if the beam at the moon is 7 km large. By this
method - among others - it would be possible to measure
that the moon is 3.8 cm leaving from the Earth every year.
(http://www.planetenkunde.de/m001/m001000/m001_mx0101_03.htm)
[All this seems to be very precise, but seems also to be
very magic, because nobody can control this. Only the
measuring station can control it itself].
But principally a "reflector" is not needed on the moon
for a reflection of a laser beam because the beam is
reflecting on the moon surface itself. there remains the
question why one has to locate the tiny reflectors "on the
moon". Because all in all it's impossible to find the
little reflectors from the Earth. There is no camera which
is strong enough to evaluate the positions to make
possible any location (Wisnewski, p.219-221).
[And there is another fact: When a measurement between
moon an Earth shall last several hours the Earth is
turning during that time some more 10°. It would be
necessary to locate the reflector another and another
time, perhaps every 10 minutes. By this the measurement
would begin an begin again. So, calm measurements over
some hours between reflectors "on the moon" and the Earth
are not at all possible].
Some
more reasons why the laser reflectors are not necessary
"on the moon"
|
|
Gernot L. Geise, Portrait [9]
|
Gernot L. Geise
indicates some more reasons why laser reflectors make no
sense "on the moon":
- <First the distance between moon
and Earth has not been determined until now as a stable
distance. Every institution which is busy with this
subject indicates other numbers. This is because the
moon is moving and has no stable connection to the
Earth. The moon is not orbiting the Earth but is with
the Earth on a "shooting course" on the same elliptic
orbit around the Sun.
- Secondly I mean that the laser mirror
of e.g. Apollo 11 is (comparing fotos) not adjusted to
the Earth. When we admit it would really be on the
moon there cannot be awaited any correct
reflexion. NASA arguments are that the mirror could not
function because it had been set up to near to the Lunar
Module.
- Thirdly there is no laser mirror
needed to measure the distance with a laser. The normal
bright reflecting lunar surface is absolutely enough.
This was explained by a technician in detail. Even
astronomer Prof. Harald Lesch (who is a fighter for
Apollo) declared in a popular scientific TV broadcast
(in Bavarian TV on BR Alpha) that the moon had a "madly
bright reflecting surface".>
(original:
- <Erstens ist der Abstand
zwischen Erde und Mond bis zum heutigen Tag nicht als
feste Grösse festgestellt worden. Jede damit
beschäftigte Institution gibt andere Werte an, was damit
zusammenhängt, dass sich der Mond bewegt und keine feste
Verbindung zur Erde hat. Der Mond umkreist nicht etwa
die Erde, sondern bewegt sich zusammen mit der Erde auf
einem "Schleuderkurs" auf derselben elliptischen
Umlaufbahn um die Sonne.
- Zweitens ist der
Laserspiegel beispielsweise von APOLLO 11 meiner Meinung
nach (aufgrund der Fotos) gar nicht auf die Erde
ausgerichtet. Von ihm - gesetzt den Fall, er würde
wirklich auf dem Mond stehen - kann also keine korrekte
Reflexion erwartet werden. Hierzu wird beispielsweise
von der NASA argumentiert, der Spiegel könne deshalb
nicht funktionieren, weil er leider zu dicht bei der
Fähre aufgestellt worden sei.
- Drittens braucht man gar
keinen Laserspiegel, um per Laser die Entfernung zu
messen. Die normal reflektierende helle Mond-Oberfläche
reicht dazu völlig aus, wie mir ein Techniker
detailliert erklärt hat. Selbst der Astronom Prof.
Harald Lesch (der an den APOLLO-Kritikern kein
gutes Haar lässt) erklärte in einer seiner
polulärwissenschaftlichen TV-Sendungen (im Bayerischen
Fernsehen auf BR-alpha), der Mond habe eine "wahnsinnig
hell reflektierende Oberfläche".>
(In: Gernot L.
Geise: Laserreflektor [Laser reflector];
http://www.gernot-geise.de/apollo/dateien/laserreflektor.html
(2006)
Where are the coordinates of
the "moon landings" and of the laser reflectors?
|
 |
|
Map
of the moon with the alleged positions of the
reflectors [10].
|
It would be logic to
think that the laser reflectors could be found where the
"moon astronauts" would have set them up during the "moon
landings" (Wisnewski, p.221). An investigation of space
flight historian Michael
Stenneken has given an other result. He wanted to
buy land "on the moon" near a "moon landing" place and
wanted to have the precise coordinates. But he found out
that there are no standardized coordinates of the "moon
landings":
-- exact, coordinated landing coordinates do not exist
-- the NASA websites present different coordinates and are
contradictory
-- NASA itself refers to their websites (Wisnewski, p.223)
-- on the websites about the landing coordinates are
mistakes, confusions between decimal system with the
degree system and so on (Wisnewski, p.224)
-- all in all Stenneken finds out 10 different coordinates
versions, eight of the from the NASA (Wisnewski, p.223).
After request the NASA experts admit that they would not
know the exact coordinates. This would not be so important
(Wisnewski, p.224).
[Mickey Mouse NASA has never looked for coordinates...]
The verification of the different coordinate versions in
the Stenneken's computer program results a maximum
aberration of the "landing places" on the moon of 20 km,
and this maximum aberration of 20 km just concerns
Apollo 11, the first "moon landing" (Wisnewski, p.224).
|
Paul Spudis,
Portrait [11]
|
It comes out that
the cartographic net on the moon had been changed between
1968 and 1995. There exist different coordinate systems
for the moon (Wisnewski, p.224). Paul Spudis from the
Johnson Space Center affirms that the control center at
Houston and the moon cartographers had used
different coordinate systems. That's why the indications
are different (Wisnewski, p.225).
Dr. David
Williams from NSSDC [12]
|
|
In 2000 comes out
that there is no official table of the "landing places"
(Wisnewski, p.226). In 2000 also Dr. Dave Williams from
the National Space Science Data Center (NSSDC) means that
a list with the landing points does not exist. He affirms
he would make a list soon "and make a decision concerning
the best places." (Wisnewski, p.224)
On 25 August 2000 NASA insider Merton Davies (who had been
a staff member even during the Corona espionage program)
publishes an official list of the landing coordinates of
the "moon landings" with the claim (Wisnewski, p.226) that
the coordinates had been evaluated by the laser reflectors
(Wisnewski, p.227).
Very good, because nobody can locate these laser
reflectors because the coordinates of the "moon landings"
are not known and the reflectors are much too little to be
recognized from Earth over a distance of 380,000 km...
(Wisnewski, p.227).
[Coordinates
are missing yet...
All in all officially only three reflectors have been set
up during a "moon landing" "on the moon". When the
locations of the "moon landings" were evaluated by the
reflectors (Apollo 11, 14, 15), so the coordinates from
three other "moon landings" would be missing yet
(Apollo 12, 16, 17).
And when a "measuring" between moon and Earth would last
several hours then the measuring is more than imprecise
because of the rotation of the Earth, resp. the measuring
is impossible...
(Conclusion by Michael Palomino)]
NASA insider Davies (born 1917) died in 2001. [He took all
NASA lies into his grave].
(http://www.answers.com/topic/davies)
Lunar Modules "on the moon"
cannot be found
The same problem with the missing coordinates is coming up
when one is looking for the Lunar Modules "on the moon"
which are said to be "on the moon" yet and should be
possible to find. The probe technique, the satellite
technique and the foto technique (foto resolution) of
today (2005) sseem not to be capable to find the things
which allegedly have been left "on the moon", also when
these things are 4,2 m large and 3,26 m high (Wisnewski,
p.246-262).
[Question:
The same question is with the "moon cars" which are said
to have been left "on the moon". But when one cannot find
a Lunar Module, who should it be possible to find the tiny
reflectors then? NASA claims at the same time that many
satellites have orbited around the moon and had made fotos
and so on. Why is not sent a strong satellite in a moon
orbit to make the fotos which are necessary to find the
Lunar Modules? It seems that the suspicion becomes
confirmed that because of a high cosmic radiation and
because of a distance of 380,000 km it's not at all
possible to shoot a satellite into a moon orbit and to
have a radio communication with it...
(Conclusion Palomino)]
Conclusion:
The reflector lie of Mickey Mouse NASA
|
Laser reflectors
on the "moon surface" are a lie [2]
|
The indications
about reflectors "on the moon" seem to be another fairy
tale in a comic style of Mickey Mouse and Mr. von Braun.
Without precise coordinates it's not possible to locate
the reflectors. And considering the rotation of the Earth
it's not possible to locate the reflectors for several
hours. Mickey Mouse and Mr. von Braun forgot that Earth is
turning around the own axis.
With the indication of Merton Davies that the positions of
the "moon landings" could be evaluated by the "reflectors"
we have the proof that NASA is a Mickey Mouse NASA. Davies
was not even capable to see the technical realities but he
defended the moon landing fantasy until his death. And of
course he determined only three of six "moon landings"
because three other had no reflector installed.
This Mickey Mouse moon landing fantasy can be admitted for
the whole NASA staff, the "US" regime inclusive.
Mickey Mouse NASA acts with further visions and is wasting
billions of Dollars tax money with it, and the Mickey
Mouse presidents of the "USA" are playing along the game.
So, there can only be advised not to purchase "land" on
the "moon", and not to purchase "moon books" with
"beautiful fotos".
(Conclusion Palomino)
This is NO conspiracy theory, stupid Wikipedia, but these
are facts. You don't believe? The facts remain.
