Dokumens
Collected Papers Vol. 3 Nr.1: until 1902 (p.415)
Collected Papers Vol. 4: since ab 1902 (p.415)

Persons

-- Stachel: boss of the review "Physics Today" in the "USA"
-- AAAS: American Association for the Advancement of Science
-- WCRI: Walker Cancer Research Institute

Circle of friends of Einstein's "Academia Olympia"
-- the Habicht brothers, Maurice Solovine, Angelo Besso and his wife
-- Ehrenfest (pen friend)
-- Max Born, dialogue partner

Friends of Mileva
-- Helene Kaufler-Savic, Helene Kaufler, Zurich
-- Bogdanovich, a mathematician in the Ministry of Education in Belgrade, who was well acquainted with Mileva Einstein-Maric
-- Dr. Ada Broch, friend of the Einstein Family in Zurich

Examples of other suppressed women
-- Dr. jur. Emilie Kempin-Spyri, first woman lawyer in Switzerland being blocked by arrogant men
-- Lise Meitner may "collaborate" for being concealed when the publication comes
-- Eda Nodacks has got the idea in 1934 - and Hahn+Strassmann receive the Nobel Prize

Professors
-- 1895-1900: ETH-Professor Jean Pernet: Einstein has no knowledge of physics
-- 1900-1902: ETH-Professor Weber rejects a position as assistant to the truant and rebel Einstein, first supervisor of Einstein, quit
-- Professor Kleiner, second supervisor of Einstein, quit
-- Professor Zangger, looked for a job for Einstein at Zurich University in 1915

---

MILEVA EINSTEIN-MARIC: The woman who did Einstein's mathematics - chronology of data

by  SENTA TROEMEL-PLOETZ; Franklin and Marshall College, Department of German and Russian, P.O. Box 3003, Lancaster, PA 17604-3003, U.S.A., and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, Germany

arranged by Michael Palomino 2019

1875: Birth of Mileva Maric (Hungarian: Marity)
-- calm, serious mother from a wealthy family (p.422)
-- the father is self-taught and employed in the military of Austria-Hungary, is also civilian civil servant (p.422)

Switzerland 1880-1970: Women in Switzerland are allowed to study - but are BLOCKED to work at a university

Plötz:

At that time, as a matter of course, the other women at the Swiss institutions of higher learning immediately dropped their scientific interests and their work once they got married, so as to take up their duties as housewives and mothers. They had come as the most brilliant and gifted women from all over Europe, they had gained access to the Swiss universities as auditors because they were deemed harmless enough, then as regular students with the help of some German male professors, expatriates from the German university [[system]] for political reasons, thus opening for Swiss women students the way to the university. All of them willingly gave up their academic inclination once their "real calling" began. Those who wanted to combine their academic life with a family were literally destroyed, like Kempin-Spyri and Mileva Einstein-Maric.

[Tesis: This block of women was because of criminal Sigmund Freud calling all women hysteric. Men did NOT WANT to understand what the needs of women really are. In Catholic Church it' like this today yet (2019) that women are rated generally as "dangerous" because Cacholic men are only praying against love every day and become impotent with 40...].

Serbia + Croatia 1881-1894: Mileva's childhood and schooling - father = self-taught, in the military, civil servant
The data of Desanka Trbuhovic-Gjurics states:
-- The father recognizes Mileva's extraordinary talent, but there is no intellectually stimulating climate in the family for her (p.422)
-- There were other intelligent, promoted women like Sonja Kovalevskaja, Sophie Germain, Marie Curie, etc. who had it much easier (p.422)
-- The people around Mileva is amazed of her math talent and they react with resistance, so Mileva has to go the path alone (p.422)

-- Mileva successfully attends several secondary schools (p.422)
-- in the end, Mileva is accepted as a private pupil in Zagreb in a male upper secondary school, after one year also in the physics class (p.422)

[Remark: women teacher's celibate against married women in Germany 1880-1951 and in Zurich 1912-1962
In the Emperor's Germany, women were forbidden to give lectures when they became married, this was the law from 1880 to 1919 and from 1923 to 1951, in Baden-Württemberg until 1956. Racist Zurich had women teacher's celibate against married women from 1912 to 1962, so just after the diplomas of the Einstein and Mileva, the block of teaching for married women was installed. It can be assumed that this women teacher's celibate was provoked by criminal Sigmund Freud who defined women generally "hysteric" and did NOT UNDERSTAND ANYTHING of women].

Serbia + Croatia: Schooling from Mileva
-- Mileva has an unusual talent in math, has academic interests, and has a good will (p.422)
-- Mileva Maric always feels lonely as a physics genius in boys' classes, at the end she is in the "elite male grammar school" (p.422)

Switzerland 1894: Mileva has to choose a country where women are allowed to study: Switzerland
- Mileva goes to Zureich (Zurich) to a girls' school to graduate (p.422)

[In those times, women can study also in France].

University of Zurich 1895: Mileva studies medicine for 1 semester
(S.422)

Study time at the Polytechnic 1896-1900: Einstein lets Mileva do the math according to the saying:

"My wife solves all my mathematical problems." (S.415)

The Collected Papers by Albert Einstein, however, conceal this important point (p.415).

-- Einstein says Mileva is a better physicist than many men
(S.419 - see: Desanka Trbuhovic-Gjuric: "In the shadow of Albert Einstein", 1983 edition, p.41)

1896-1900: ETH Professor Jean Pernet: Einstein has no knowledge of physics

-- a professor at the Polytechnic in Zurich, Jean Pernet, advises Einstein to study something other than physics (Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p. 46):

Translation of Plötz:

"Studying physics is very difficult. You don't lack diligence and good will but simply knowledge. Why don't you study medicine, law, or literature instead?" (p.421)

1896-1900: Mileva plays the "talent" for Einstein
-- Mileva supports Einstein in high math and gives him the mathematical proofs (p.421). Plötz:

"He did not have to worry about the proofs because Mileva Einstein-Maric was doing them." (p.421)

Zureich 1896: Mileva changes to math + physics at the ETH
For the Polytechnic University [[called ETH since 1911]] she has to pass an additional entrance exam in math (p.422)

[Are the entrance exams available from Mileva?]

At the same time, Mileva is very close to her homeland and loves the Bačka [[Backa, Batschka]] in the Balkans (p.428).


Polytechnic + ETH 1895-1962: The atmosphere of arrogant men in the Polytechnic (since 1911: ETH): They simply do not want women there

-- at the Polytechnic around 1900 there is a male arrogance, is elitist-male (p.422)
-- at the Polytechnic Mileva is again the only woman in the whole course Math + Physics (p.422)
-- men simply mean "that women do not belong there" (p.422)
-- No positive expectations are placed on women, no promotion, no care as for male students (p.422)
-- Male students benefit from the privileges of promotion and assistantship (p.422)
-- The professors do not specifically support Mileva, they tolerate Mileva, but she must certainly organize everything herself (p.422)
-- Professors do not expect Mileva to succeed (p.422)

[The atmosphere against women: the poison of the criminal Sigmund Freud
At the end of the 19th century, Sigmund Freud, as a guru, dominated "modern" psychology with his general difamation that all women were "hysterical" in the case of doubt. This spiritual poison spreads throughout the "educated," male-dominated upper class of the world, and therefore women are in a hopeless situation. Then after Freud came Bleuler claiming that anything that does not fit into the picture was "schizophrenic", so that women did not have a chance either. Only C.G. Jung with neutral psychoanalysis has "neutralized" the criminal psychologists Freud + Bleuler: Freud and Bleuler came out as two psychotic ...]

from 1896: Mileva is de facto the scientific employee of Einstein
(S.415)

Polytechnic in Zurich 1896-1900: The gifted Mileva
Desanka's information in the book "In the Shadow of Albert Einstein" say:
-- Mileva Maric [[Hungarian: Marity]] is a "highly gifted woman" (p.421)
-- Mileva Maric is the fifth woman ever to study math and physics (Section VI A) (p.421-422)
-- Mileva Maric is the only woman in her class (p.422)

Polytechnikum 1896-1919: Mileva glaubt an das "grosse Talent" von Einstein

Polytechnic 1896-1919: Mileva believes in the "great talent" of Einstein

-- Mileva believes in Einstein (p.421)
-- Einstein lets himself be driven by Mileva (p.421)
-- Einstein constantly needs the support of Mileva, her opinion, her judgements (p.421)
-- For Einstein, the judgment of Mileva is more important than his own judgment (!) (p.421)
-- Mileva gives Einstein everything she has: diligence, perseverance, mathematical genius, mathematical devotion (p.421)
-- Mileva works for Einstein's success in pure self-abandonment and develops Einstein's abilities (p.421)
-- Mileva also financially supports Einstein in crises (p.421)
-- Mileva is Einstein's doll in bed and cares for the house (p.421)
-- Mileva subordinated all her abilities, dreams and aspirations to Einstein (p.427 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.119).

[Einstein and Mileva were already in other worlds - against the professors
Einstein and Mileva knew so much about new physics that they were already "floating in other worlds" against the professors, and they also did their own experiments in the laboratories and did not keep the timetable for many professors. Einstein and Mileva were pioneers, many knew about it, but the professors did not like this because students can not be professors ... web08]

Serbia 1897: Birth of mathematician physicist Desanka Trbuhovic-Gjuric, who publishes the first Mileva biography in 1969
-- Desanka (1897-1983) becomes Serbian mathematician and physicist, as Mileva is (p.415)
-- Desanka then teaches at the Institute of Technology and at the University of Belgrade (p.415)
-- After her retirement she is researching and writing the biography of Mileva Einstein-Maric, the first wife of Albert Einstein (p.415)

Final study period 1899-1901 of Einstein+Mileva
-- Albert Einstein writes his diploma thesis and his dissertation (p.419)
-- Friends of Mileva say they feel that Albert Einstein exploits her too much
(p.419 - see: Desanka Trbuhovic-Gjuric: "In the shadow of Albert Einstein", 1983 edition, p.55)

1899ca .: The topic of the diploma thesis for Mileva: heat conduction
Mileva reports in a letter to a friend:
-- Professor Weber is very satisfied with the topic "heat conduction" (p.422)
-- Mileva looks forward to research results (p.422)
-- Albert Einstein also chose an "interesting topic" (p.422)

Polytech. 1900: Einstein does for Dr. med. Weber a "diploma thesis"
(p.421)

[at least half of which is probably inspired and written by Mileva - this diploma thesis by Einstein should be carefully examined with which handwriting she is written (!)].

1900: The grading of the diploma theses: Einstein 4,5 (from a maximum of 6) - Mileva only 4,0 (from a maximum of 6)
-- Both diploma theses dealt with heat conduction (p.422)
-- Einstein did not particularly care about the subject, but Mileva was enthusiastic about the subject (p.422)
-- Apparently Dr. Weber rated Mileva deliberately down with a much too low mark for her thesis, the normal treatment of women at colleges in Europe around 1900, to destroy women's careers (p.422)

[Supplement: Fight of Dr. Weber against Einstein+Mileva
Dr. Weber rejected to give the truant and rebel Einstein an assistant job - then Mileva was fighting for Einstein against Dr. Weber - this could not be accepted and Dr. Weber rated Mileva down. Mileva had a helper's syndrome].

Polytech. 1900: Polytech professor Weber rejects a position as assistant to Einstein
while all other fellow students have got an assistant post after their diploma with Dr. Weber (p.421). Plotz:

"Professor Weber, another physicist and ETH professor, for whom he did his thesis for the diploma, refused categorically to give Albert Einstein an assistant post while giving all his co-students assistantships after their exam." (S.421)

[because Einstein could not behave, was a truant and a rebel, threw instructions in the basket or provoked explosions in the laboratory etc.].

Polytech. 1900: Mileva wanted to extend her diploma thesis as a dissertation for a Dr. title
The physics professor Dr. Weber did not want to allow that, otherwise he would have had to take on Mileva as his assistant (p.422).

1900: The men's society "takes over" achievements of women
-- Women authors are not accepted (p.418)
-- Woman co-authors giving ideas or woman employees are not even mentioned (p.418)
-- Women as authors or co-authors simply "disappear" and men "take over" the work, or the woman is definitely referred to the "second place" (p.418)
-- At best, the name of a woman may appear in a dedication (p.418), but Einstein probably did not even devote a dedication or a book to Mileva (p.418)

1900: woman mathematicians get no recognition from the men
(p.417)
-- Certain mechanisms in the system block the women's careers (p.417)
-- Certain mechanisms in the system suppress women (p.417)
-- With the couple of Albert and Mileva Einstein, the effect of the system has fatal consequences for Mileva (p.417).

Europe at 1900 appr: Hate against women at universities: teachers joke against women + teach prejudices
-- Attention and interaction of teachers in the classroom focuses on boys (p.423 - Thorne, Kramarae & Henley, 1983; Spender, 1982)
-- Women at universities are even more discriminated as the gender expectations are higher in adult women than in girls (p.423 - Treichler and Kramarae (1983)
-- The propaganda in the class rooms provokes a cold atmosphere with typical male interaction patterns (p.423)
-- There is also a general disbelief towards competent women (p.423 - Hagen & Kahn, 1975, Piacente et al., 1974, Seyfried & Hendricks, 1973)
-- There is also a specific bias towards women in the Academy (p.423 - Farley, 1982; Spencer, Kehoe, & Speece, 1982; Rossi & Calderwood, 1973; Abramson, 1975; Howe, 1975; DeSole & Hoffman, 1961) Haber, 1981).

-- The perception of women is totally distorted (p.423)
-- Women in a male course are bombarded with prejudice (p.423)
-- The professors do not allow women to take a doctorate, not an assistant job, not the access to the university's inner life (p.423)
-- Professors with discriminatory marks against women confirm their own prejudices (p.423)
-- Women also rate women worse than men, which begins to change only in the 1970s (!) (p.423 - Chabot & Goldberg, 1974, Mischel, 1974, Levenson et al., 1975)

1900: The Swiss university system fights and blocks intelligent women: example Kempin-Spyri

-- Women are systematically rated lower, so they do not have a diploma, and certainly do not write a thesis (p.423)
-- The case of dr. jur. Emilie Kempin-Spyri:

Zurich- "USA" -Berlin-Basel 1880-1901: The case of Dr. med. jur. Emilie Kempin-Spyri - blocked to death by the men
She graduated at the University of Zurich in 1887 with a doctorate "summa cum laude", but does not get a job permission because she has no voting right as a woman in Switzerland; the court approves her claim that men and women are equal before the law, but can not obtain a profession permit; a habilitation is assigned to her in 1888; she emigrates to the "USA" and founds the First Woman Law College, then returns to the CH, tries a second habilitation (p.423), but the university senate refuses to do so, then the State Education Committee overrules the Senate with a permit and Kempin-Spyri gets in 1891 the "venia legendi" for Roman, Anglo-Saxon and American law; Colleagues or students do not take her seriously, her lectures are hardly attended, she does not get a professorship; her husband as a journalist is also unsuccessful; the family moves to Berlin, opens an international consulting office; the man leaves the family, she has the two children alone, she works to the point of exhaustion, she is in debt; In 1899, Kempin-Spyri suffered a nervous breakdown, was sent to psychiatric clinic Schällemätteli in Basel, and friends had to pay the costs. Finally, she applied for home help and then died of cancer at the age of 48 before accepting the position for 10 francs a month
(p.424 - see: Susanna Woodtli: Equality: The struggle for the political rights of women in Switzerland, Frauenfeld, Huber-Verlag 1975)
(original German: Susanna Woodtli: Gleichberechtigung: Der Kampf um die politischen Rechte der Frau in der Schweiz. Frauenfeld, Huber-Verlag 1975)

Zurich and the whole world 1900: men rate women worse: ETH, BBC etc. - women write under male pseudonyms to be successful (!)

-- Women are rated worse than men, this is still the case in 1979 (p.422 - from: Gruber and Gaebelein 1979, p.299, see also: Rosenkrantz et al., 1968; see also: Elman, Press, & Rosencrantz, 1970)
-- Women are rated worse, even if they produce the same results (S.422 - from: Goldberg, 1968, Pheterson, Kiesler & Goldberg, 1971, Mischel, 1974, Starer & Denmark, 1974)
-- Identical texts are rated worse when the signature is with a a female name (p.422 - from: Goldberg, 1968)
-- when the "norm" white, male, Anglo-Saxon-Protestant is not fulfilled, the work is rated worse (p.422 - from: Bosmajian: "The Language of Oppression" (1974)
-- Even male babies are brought up more favorably than female babies, depending on the educator (p.422)
-- Women who write novels must write under male pseudonyms (!) (p.423)
-- The selection of people to conferences still takes place according to the names, and choosing the subjects without names, suddenly more women and minority authors are admitted to conferences (p.423)
-- Women as newscasters have little chance in some TV channels, e.g. in the BBC (p.423 - from: Kramarae 1984).

[Tesis: Sigmund Freud was against all women - and upper class copied Sigmund Freud - all women were in danger for being called "hysteric"
The macho Sigmund Freud with his primitive "will"-psychology was the main force against the understanding of women claiming that all women would be hysteric or at least all women would be a risk for being hysteric without control. This was a GUIDELINE blocking women from school systems, from carrers and from politics - in criminal Switzerland this block was partly until 1989 when the Federal Court gave women the right to vote in Appenzell Innerrhoden - against the votes of the men there (!)].

[Tesis: The system of discrimination
The system of discrimination of women was so perfect that women could only make carreer helping a man - and men expoited women for this with robbery of identity and copyright and honor - this criminality towards women was "normal" in those times]

1900-1910: time of "greatest creativity" with Einstein
-- with Mileva, Einstein experiences "his greatest creativity" (p.421)
-- the remark about the role of Mileva in Collected Papers Vol.1 (1987, p.381) is a criminal understatement (""Her intellectual and personal relationships (sic!) with the young Einstein played an important role in his development") (p.421)

[The reality is another one: Einstein's works from 1900 to 1919 are to a considerable extent an expression of the creativity of Mileva Maric (!)].

Mileva's helper syndrome for Einstein: Mileva withdraws in protest against Dr. Weber her diploma thesis

Zureich 1900: Mileva fights for Albert Einstein, who does NOT get an assistant job with Dr. Weber - and thus she risks her own diploma - Mileva commits self-sacrifice (!) - while Albert Einstein was the worst and under 5.0 (!)

Plötz:

From Trbuhovic-Gjuric's book, it seems that Mileva Einstein-Maric jeopardized her promising collaborative relationship with Professor Weber because she fought for Albert Einstein when he, as the only student out of four, did not receive an assistantship after the Diplom examination at the ETH (p.425).

[Diploma of Albert Einstein with 4.91 - to get rid of him?
Albert Einstein had an average of 4.91 for his diploma and principally he did NOT pass because the Polytechnic Highschool required a clear 5.0 for passing. So the professors donated the diploma to the rebel Albert Einstein and let him "just slip through" [web04]. Weber refused him an immediate job as an assistant. The professors probably rightly said that Einstein had missed so many lectures, always copied from others and often rebelled in the internships, and now he is also under 5.0, so he should first go somewhere else looking for something. It may be that the whole thing was just a maneuver to get rid of Einstein. Therefore investigation is needed:
-- Einstein's exams and dissertation as well as the exams and dissertations of the fellow students should be revised
-- there should exist letters from Mileva to Weber at the Weber family with the appeal for the rebel Einstein
-- there should still exist minutes from the sessions of the Physics leaders of the Polytechnic Highschool when the case of Einstein and Maric was discussed [conclusion - web05].

Weber had categorically declared that he did not want Albert Einstein as an assistant. I do not know whether one of the three men students also fought for Albert Einstein and by doing so risked his relationship with Weber. One of them, Albert Einstein's friend Marcel Grossmann, at least later on, got his father to use his connections and get Albert Einstein his first full-time position (at the Swiss Patent Office, Bern) (p.425).


[Mileva's helper syndrome for Einstein: Mileva Maric INVENTS an "unfairness" (!) - Mileva Maric withdraws her own diploma thesis in protest (!)]]

Mileva Einstein-Maric, in any case, had conflicts with Weber because she wanted him to see his unfairness [[?]] to Albert Einstein who, in his final exam, had an average [[4.91]] quite a bit below that of the other three men candidates. Did she ever give any thought to the possibility of fighting for an assistantship for herself? Did any one of her fellow students fight for her? ¨Would Albert Einstein, had he been in her position, have fought for her at the expense of his career? I think we can answer the last question because Albert Einstein did not do anything for her, never mind any fighting for her, even when it would no onger have harmed his career. -- Trbuhovic-Gjuric writes (1983, p.59):

"She went so far to eventually [[finally]] withdraw her excellent Diplomarbeit [[dissertation]], stopped her research with him [=Weber, ST-P], and in August 1901, left the Polytechnikum for good." (p.425)

[1900: Thesis: The evaluation of Dr. med. Weber on Einstein and on Mileva: Albert = raven bad and Mileva = hysterical
Dr. Weber will have told himself:
-- This woman Mileva Maric is blind with love and does not want to accept the fact that the Albert Einstein just can not do a polytechnic
-- Albert Einstein is also so bad because he just missed lectures and rebelled so much
-- and when Mrs. Mileva Maric is so blind with love, then, according to Sigmund Freud, she is "hysterical", unpredictable and then one should not permit a diploma to her
-- and THAT'S WHY Mileva did not succeed for her diploma two times].

Again, the consequences for the woman were different from those for the man. Albert Einstein, who had the primary conflict with Weber, got his Diplomarbeit [[dissertation]] (which he was not interested in) graded better than hers, he got his degree (Diplom), he even started his doctoral dissertation with Weber and when that did not work out, someone else (Kleiner) was found with whom he continued. Even when Kleiner refused it or advised him to withdraw in 1901, it did not keep him from getting his doctorate four years later. (p.425)


[1900: Mileva remains without degree - Einstein rated her as a PhD - Einstein was exploiting her (!!!)]

Plötz:

Mileva Einstein-Maric ended up without any degree whatsoever, although Albert Einstein had envisaged her as a PhD [[Dr. Phil.]] when he would still be "ein ganz gewöhnlicher Mensch" ("a totally ordinary human being") ("Collected Papers, Vol. 1", 1987, p.260). While she was working on her dissertation and preparing for her exam, she also had other duties. Mileva Einstein-Maric's friends thought that Albert Einstein was exploiting her too much. This was said just at the time when both of them were writing their Diplomarbeiten [[dissertations]] and before the final oral examinations. (p.425)

[1900+1901: Mileva fails twice her diploma - no reasons indicated]

Plötz:

Following this rule also, we do not hear anything in the "Collected Papers, Vol.1", about why Mileva Einstein-Maric failed twice. In the first exam, which she apparently took with Albert Einstein, we can see her grades and the statement of her failure in document 67. In the second case, we have to take the editor's word in another footnote for the fact (note 1 to document 121), therefore we do not know wheter she failed by default, that is, by withdrawing her Diplomarbeit, [[dissertation]] as Trbuhovic-Gjuric suggests (p.430).

1901: Mileva withdraws her diploma tesis in protest against Dr. Weber because of Einstein's not given assistant position

<Trbuhovic-Gjuric writes (1983, p.59):

"She went so far to eventually [[finally]] withdraw her excellent Diplomarbeit [[tesis]], stopped her research with him [=Weber, ST-P], and in August 1901, left the Polytechnikum for good."> (p.425)

[Dissertation of Mileva is kept secret]

Plötz:

But not only are the leads in Trbuhovic-Gjuric's book not followed up, there are also no questions asked about the numerous references to Mileva Einstein-Maric's doctoral dissertation by Albert Einstein himself. What happened to this doctoral dissertation? Do we know its title? Is it still in existence? Are parts of it reconstructible from letters or documents? (p.430)

Of course, this is not a biography of Mileva Einstein-Maric, and there must be a limit to asking questions about her in the "Collected Papers of Albert Einstein" (p.430).

[Mileva's letter to Helene Kaufler-Savic: Mileva completed a dissertation - this dissertation has "disappeared"]

The most important requirement is to ask few questions about the woman, and many, but not all, questions about the man. Following this rule, every one of the seven letters by Mileva Einstein-Maric to her friend Helene Kaufler-Savic that are reprinted have parts deleted, even parts that are needed and referred to later. For example, one letter (document 64) has three deletions. And editorial footnote indicates that one deletion concerns Mileva Einstein-Maric's Diplomarbeit [[dissertation]] which she wrote that she had completed ("Collected Papers, Vol.1", 1987, p.245). We have to trust this statement.

Another editorial footnote (footnote 5 of document 75) to a later letter from Albert Einstein to Mileva Einstein-Maric refers exactly to the deleted portion of document 64, this time quoting an incomplete sentence from it, from which the predicate is missing: "eine grössere Arbeit-... die ich mir als Diplom- und wahrscheinlich auch als Doktorarbeit ausgewählt (p.429), ..." (a larger work ... which I chose as my thesis for my diploma, probably also for my doctorate ...) ("Collected Papers, Vol. 1", 1987, p.260). From this excerpt we cannot deduce what she is saying about the topic which she has chosen. Is she that unimportant that only bits and pieces of her letter are put into a later footnote? Is what she says about her Diplomarbeit [[dissertation]] (which, as we know, has disappeared) that unimportant? Instead of presenting document 64 fully, footnote 5 of document 75, with its fragment of a sentence is referred to again and again in further editorial footnotes. Good editorial practice? Certainly not, but good editorial practice is apparently not required when it comes to women. (p.430)

[1948: The estate of Mileva after her death: Mrs. Frieda Einstein
The estate of Mileva after her death was taken by Mrs. Frieda Einstein to Berkeley near San Francisco where the Hans Albert Einstein family lived (see: Wolff: Preisgeld - 2019). Mileva's thesis should be there in Berkeley, or the other Einstein son Eduard had it and when he died in 1965 nobody came. Or the thesis was thrown away in 1948 already because not all books could be taken by air plane to Berkeley?]

from 1900: The collaboration Einstein-Mileva continues
from 1900: Einstein confirms the further cooperation with Mileva - in letters (!)

This cooperation is also reflected in Albert Einstein's letters (p.425):

In September 1900, almost immediately after his exam, Albert Einstein writes to Mileva Einstein-Maric:

"Ich freue mich auch sehr auf unsere neuen Arbeiten" ("I am also looking forward very much to our new papers") (p.425 - "Collected Papers, Vol.1, 1987, p.260).

In a letter of October 1900, the letter in which he calls her his equal, he again refers to common work on capillarity, which they will send to the [[review of]] "Annalen" [[Annals of Physics in Leipzig]] if it should turn out (p.425) to be successful (p.426 - "Collected Papers, Vol.1", 1987, p.267).

In a letter of March 1901, Albert Einstein writes to Mileva Einstein-Maric:

"How happy and proud I will be when both of us together will have brought our work on relative motion to a successful end" (p.426 - "Collected Papers, Vol.1", 1987, p.282).

1901: Albert Einstein submits a dissertation, [[written partly by Mileva?]]
but apparently she withdraws (p.419). Quote Plötz:

<1901, the time when he wrote his thesis (Diplomarbeit) and his dissertation (submitted in Fall 1901, later apparently withdrawn.> (p.419)

[There is the big question why Einstein had to withdraw his dissertation in 1901. Maybe it was written by Mileva or in Mileva's handwriting? Where is it?]

April 1901: work by Einstein + Mileva: "Phenomena of Capillarity"

"Annals of Physics" April 1901: Einstein enters a work: Conclusions Drawn from the Phenomena of Capillarity. In: Annalen der Physik, 4, 513-523
-- the work is published on Einstein's name, Mileva remains unmentioned (p.430)
-- Einstein does not protest, although in letters he keeps on "our work" (p.430)
-- even here Einstein systematically promotes the success of men and the women are systematically discriminated (p.430)

[Supplement: The false "obedience" in Emperor Germany against the women
If Einstein had protested and said that Mileva should also be mentioned in the article, he might have received a reprimand or even a publication ban, because in Emperor Germany the Emperor always decides, not Einstein! And so the discrimination of women goes on and on, because all "high ranks" always want to maintain "obedience" and do not want to change the discrimination of women ...]

April 1901: Albert Einstein claims: "Our research" and "our work"

Plötz:

In einem Brief vom April 1901 spricht er über "unsere Forschung" und "unsere Arbeiten" und bezieht sich auf das, was nur unter seinem Namen veröffentlicht wurde: Die Arbeit "Folgerungen aus den Capillaritätserscheinungen" in den "Annalen der Physik" 4 (1901) (S.426 - Collected Papers Band 1, 1987, S.286).

Mai 1901: Albert Einstein behauptet: "Gemeinsam auf dieser schönen Straße weitermachen"

Plötz:

In a letter of May 1901, he is referring to the same paper again by "our paper" and says,

"If only we had a chance soon to continue together on that beautiful road" (p.426 - "Collected Papers, Vol.1", 1987, p.300).

In a letter of the same month he writes (p.426):

"Think how beautiful it will be when we are able again to work together without any disturbance and interference from outside! Your present sorrows will be brilliantly replaced by sheer pleasure and our days will pass quietly without any hectic" (p.426 - "Collected Papers, Vol.1", 1987, p.304).

since 1902: Mileva has given away her child - has Weber as an enemy - has the Jewish Einstein parents as enemies - and still supports Einstein

Plötz:

After the exam, from the middle of 1900 to the middle of 1902, a very difficult time began for both of them. Albert Einstein could not get any position he applied for, although he tried again and again. Mileva Einstein-Maric was pregnant with a child by Albert Einstein, gave birth to it in 1902, out of wedlock, and evidently had to give it up for adoption [[by financial reasons or because she was outlawed by her family?]]. Albert Einstein's parents objected to Mileva Einstein-Maric as a person, and to the planned marriage. Mileva Einstein-Maric stuck with him, stuggling against the external world, be it Weber or Albert Einstein's parents, supporting him when he got rejected and, above all, working with him ("Collected Papers, Vol.1", 1987, p.275): "Wir leben und arbeiten immer noch wie früher" ("we are living and working the way we did earlier", meaning: as students).(p.425)

1902ca .: Mileva comes up with the idea to investigate the ether - and Einstein then gets the award
Plötz asks:

Plötz fragt:

"Why did he not acknowledge in public that it was she who came up with the idea to investigate ether and its importance (Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.69)?"  (p.418)

Bern 1902-1905: Einstein + Mileva publishing 3 articles
-- "On a Heuristic Point of View Concerning the Production and Transformation of Light"
(original German: "Einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt") (p.419)

-- "On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies "
(original German: "Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper" enthält die Spezielle Relativitätstheorie (p.419)

Mid-1902-1909: Einstein gets a job at the Patent Office in Bern
The father of friend Marcel Grossmann has rendered a service to Einstein here (p.418)

Mid-1902-1909: Einstein maintains his study group "Academia Olympia": Einstein + Habicht brothers + Solovine + Besso + Mrs. Besso
Plötz:

" Together with friends (the brothers Habicht, Maurice Solovine, Angelo Besso, and his wife), they met regularly to read philosophical and scientific works which they discussed and studies. They called their group Academia Olympia." (p.418)

1902-1909: The "fruitful phase" of Einstein with Mileva in Bern from 1902 to 1909

Desanka Trbuhovic-Gjuric (1983, p.158) quotes Albert Einstein's friends,

David Reichenstein: "It is strange how fruitful that short period of his life was. not only his special theory of relativity but a lot of other basic papers bear the date 1905." (p.419)

Leopold Infeld, one of his biographers, remarked on "the irony of fate and the external contradicitons" in Albert Einstein's life (Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.158): "His most important scientific work he wrote as a little civil servant in the Patent Office in Bern." (p.419)

Peter Michelmore, who had much information from Albert Einstein, said (Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.72):

"Mileva helped him solve certain mathematical problems. She was with him in Bern and helped him (p.419) when he was having such a hard time with the theory of relativity." (p.420)

Hermann Minkowsky, a great mathematician and a former professor of Albert Einstein, who knew him well and was his friend, is said to have remarked to Max Born:

"This was a big surprise to me because Einstein was quite a lazybones and wasn't at all interested in mathematics" (p.420) - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.74).

Bogdanovich, a mathematician in the Ministry of Educaiton in Belgrade who was well acquainted with Mileva Einstein-Maric, is reported to have said that she had always known that Mileva Einstein-Maric had helped her husband a great deal, especially with the mathemtical foundation of his theory, but Mileva Einstein-Maric had always avoided talking about it (p.420 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.164).


Patent Office in Bern 1902-1909: Einstein does not register the name of Mileva?

Plötz asks:

"What kept him from giving her full name when he published a patent which appeared under the name Einstein-Habicht?" (p.418 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, S.69)

6.1.1903: Marriage of Albert Einstein with Mileva Maric
(p.418)

Plötz:

<Mileva Einstein-Maric continued to collaborate with Albert Einstein as they had been doing since they first studied together, and she was also responsible for the household chores.> (p.418)

from 1903: close cooperation Einstein-Mileva after the marriage

Plötz:

<Albert Einstein's wish would come true even though the time was not so quiet and unhectic for Mileva Einstein-Maric. Their collaboraiton became even more intensive beginning in 1903, when they got married. Whereas before, they had to spend some time apart, they now had uninterrupted time together. -- Trbuhovic-Gjuric writes (1983, p.68) (p.426):

The marriage of these two very different, highly gifted people was very happy at that time. She was happy with him - content to work for him and around him. She carried the full burden of everyday life; he could spend his time on his work and she heloped him not only with her knowledge but also with her confidence in him, and her stimulating energy. She was overjoyed that he valued and loved her for these characteristics which distinguished her from other women. She made it possible for him to have a quiet, ordered life, free of worry. The congenial sides of her personality caused resonances of harmony in him.> (p.426)

Serbia 1903? Einstein letter to the father of Mileva: Mileva = source of inspiration + guardian angel

Plötz:

<Why did his recognition of her work remain private, for example, he told Mileva Einstein-Maric's father (p.418 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.76):

I didn't mary your daughter because of the money but because I love her, because I need her, because we are both one. Everything I have done and accomplished I owe to Mileva. She is my genial source of inspiration, my protective angel against sins in life and even more so in science. Without her I would not have started my work let alone finished it.> (p.418)

1904: The first son Hans Albert Einstein - Mileva's brother comes to Zurich for babysitting

Plötz:

<Things changed slightly when their first child (in wedlock) was born in May 1904. Mileva Einstein-Maric's work increased, but she still supported, and worked with, Albert Einstein. When her brother studied in Zurich, he became her helper, babysitting for the child, and this allowed her time to check her husband's computations.>  (p.426).

Novi Sad - early 1905: Einstein+Mileva live with baby Hans Albert in the residence of the Maric family
(S.431)

Novi Sad - Early 1905: Einstein Trumps Mileva: "She solves all the mathematical problems for me"
Plötz:

<He told a group of Serbian intellectuals in 1905: "I need my wife. She solves all the mathematical problems for me."> (p.418 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.75).

Novi Sad - Early 1905: Mileva with prophety of the success of Einstein
Plötz:

<Mileva Einstein-Maric told her father during a visit by Albert Einstein and herself in 1905: "A short while ago we finished a very important work which will make my husband world-famous.>" (p.420 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.75).

Bern 1905: Albert Einstein submits a dissertation and receives a "Dr.Titel"
(p.419)

1905ca. Einstein says that the subject of heat conduction of his thesis was of no interest to him
(S.422)

1905: Einstein has a "creative breakout" and publishes the documents
with which he will win the Nobel Prize (p.415)


1905: Einstein has 5 articles in the "Annals of Physics" ("Annalen der Physik")
-- there is e.g. his dissertation with 21 pages, written in Zureich (Zurich) (p.419)

[As it seems, Einstein has presented only his old work of 1902 which was written by Mileva?]

Leipzig: "Annals of Physics" 1905: Einstein + Mileva enter 3 manuscripts
-- with the signature Einstein-Maric (p.419)
-- "Heuristic point of view concerning the generation and transformation of light" (p.419)
-- "Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies" which contains the Special Theory of Relativity (p.419)
-- the articles are in Volume XVII of the "Annals of Physics" ("Annalen der Physik") (p.419)

The control of the manuscripts: Röntgen and Joffe have seen the double name Einstein-Maric
-- The entered manuscripts are reviewed by the editorial staff, including Dr. Ing. Röntgen, who has an assistant, Abram F. Joffe, who later becomes a famous Russian physicist (p.419)
-- he sees that all three original manuscripts are signed with Einstein-Maric (p.419 - see: "In the shadow of Albert Einstein" 1983, p.97)

The publication of the 3 articles by Einstein and Mileva: WITHOUT Mileva's family name "Maric" [[Hungarian: "Marity"]]
-- the editors are elimintating arbitrarily the family name "Maric" [[hungarianized: "Marity"]] (p.419)

[-- The public thinks that all 3 articles are from Einstein alone
-- The public does not notice that Mileva has a substantial share of the 3 articles and Einstein does not even protest (!)
-- This is a gang crime committed by Einstein and the editors of the "Annals of Physics" ("Annalen der Physik") in Leipzig
-- That makes Einstein a forger, and the "Annals of Physics" are a forger's gang]

Leipzig: "Annalen der Physik" 1905: The publishers cancel from the signature Einstein-Maric the name of Mileva Maric - and Einstein does not protest?

Plötz asks:

<Why did he not immediately insist on a correction when Mileva Einstein-Maric's name was dropped as an author of the articles that appeared in 1905 in the Leipzig "Annalen der Physik"? Later on he received the Nobel Prize for one of those articles.> (Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.69)> (p.418)

from 1905: Einstein becomes famous and gets heaps of high posts at universities - Mileva gets nothing
So this Einstein is in Prague, Berlin, Princeton or Pasadena - and Mileva stays in nowhere (p.416).

from 1905: Einstein becomes famous and achieves everything - Mileva becomes invisible, remains unknown and unheard
(S.415)
-- Einstein was pampered for success (p.415)
-- Mileva's successes were destroyed (p.415).

from 1905: Manuscripts from 1905 have "disappeared"
The manuscripts with all the notes to these three works [[of 1905]] no longer exist (p.419). Plötz:

<The manuscripts, together with all the notes for these three papers, are no longer existant.> (p.419)

[-- it is possible that the "Annals of Physics" destroyed the manuscripts
-- it is possible that Einstein himself destroyed the manuscripts to cover up the collaboration of Mileva
-- 1943 in the "USA" Einstein states that he himself destroyed the manuscript on the Theory of Relativity]

Novi Sad - 1907: Einstein+Mileva live with son Hans Albert in the residence of the Maric family
(p.431)

1907: The patent for the Einstein-Habicht apparatus for the measurement of small electrical currents - Mileva does not want to register (!)

Mileva collaborates on the invention of the Einstein Habicht apparatus (p.418). Desanka Trbuhovic-Gjuric writes:

"Together with Paul Habicht she worked at the construction of a machine for measuring small electrical currents by way of multiplication. It took a long time, not only because she had so much to do [Einstein's mathematical problems, ST-P], but also because of her thoroughness and perfectionism. She had already distinguished herself in the physics lab in Zurich. When both she and Habicht were satisfied with their results, they left it to Albert Einstein, as a patent expert, to describe the apparatus."
(p. 418 - from: Desanka Trbuhovic-Gjuric: "In the shadow of Albert Einstein" (German: "Im Schatten von Albert Einstein"), edition 1983, p.65):

-- The "Annals of Physics" publish in 1907 Einstein's article on the Einstein Habicht-apparatus entitled "A New Electrostatic Method for Measuring Smaller Quantities of Electricity", only under Einstein's name (!) (p.418)

[so: Mileva AND Habicht are left out (!)]

-- The "Physical Magazine" No. 7, 1908 publishes another article by Einstein with a detailed description of the measurement method with the Einstein Habicht-apparatus, again only under Einstein's name (!) (p.418)

[again: Mileva AND Habicht are left out (!)]

-- The patent for the Einstein Habicht apparatus is registered under Einstein-Habicht (Patent No. 35693), Mileva is renouncing (S.418-419).


Trbuhovic-Gjuric comments it like this what happened (1983, p.65):

When one of the Habicht brothers asked Mileva Einstein-Maric why she had not given her own name in the application for the patent, she answered: What for, we are both only ONE STONE (=Einstein). Then Paul Habicht also decided to give only his last name.

[Tesis: Mileva with farmer's mentality does not see the reality in Zurich
Leaving everything to the husband is a farmer's bride's mentality when a big family is around and when there is no need to fight for life. Mileva is awaiting a reward at another moment. But this tactic is not working in Zurich with Einstein and in a men's world: Mileva suffers a psychological lack of reality and the men do not see this but are exploiting her and at the end she is destroyed by Leipzig (review "Annals of Physics" eliminating her name) and Berlin (where Einstein is dropping her off his brain with his family and secret friends clubs)
The false modesty is also caused by the criminal psychology of Sigmund Freud, who defines women as "hysterical" and that is parroted in the upper class and at all universities. Mileva will avoid any attention so as not to be rated "hysterical"].

The consequences for Mileva without entry in the Patent Office:
-- Authorship with the indication "Einstein" is automatically given to Albert Einstein (p.418)
-- Mileva loses all authorship at work, although she has spent much time on the Einstein Habicht-apparatus (p.418)

[So: The world does not at all know officially that Mileva Einstein has essentially been working testing the Einstein Habicht apparatus].

CH 1907: New Civil Code: Women must put the husband's name first
This counts until 1988 (p.418)


1909-1910: Einstein becomes a professor at the University of Zurich - students live in the house - Mileva solves Einstein's mathematical problems until after midnight - Einstein is only a dishwasher and can STILL HAVE NO MATH (!)

Plötz:

<In 1909, Albert Einstein received a professorship at the University of Zurich. His income was better than in Bern but, to give him more financial independence, Mileva Einstein-Maric took in student lodgers who lived and ate with them. Mileva Einstein-Maric strained her physical limits. A student of Albert Einstein reports coming to his apartment (p.426 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.87):

"The door was open, the steps and the hallway were wet from cleaning, and his wife, after all this work, was standing in the kitchen cooking the midday meal with her sleeves rolled up."(p.426)

A mathematician of the University of Zagreb recalled that Albert Einstein every now and then helped his wife doing the household chores because he felt sorry that after her housework was done, she had to do his mathematical problems till way past midnight (p.426 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.87).

But Mileva Einstein-Maric did not tire and was happy about her husband's success. She wrote to her friend Helene on September 3, 1909 (p.426 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.87):

My husband is at a congress of German natural scientists in Salzburg at the moment where he is to give a talk. He is considered among the first German speaking physicists now. I am very happy about his successes because he really deserves them.> (p.426

July 1910-1914: Mileva with two sons - 1 year in Prague - Einstein becomes a professor at the ETH - no time for family life - Einstein still without high mathematics

-- with the birth of the second son Eduard, Mileva has even more work (p.426)
-- Mileva has no personal interests any more (p.426)
-- Mileva's health is deteriorating (p.426)
-- From now on, Mileva's mathematical contribution to the work of Einstein is reduced (p.426 - "In the Shadow of Albert Einstein" (1983), p.89)

Albert Einstein still can not do high mathematics and has to ask advanced students and friends for help (!!!) (p.426). Plötz:

<From then on, Mileva Einstein-Maric's contribution to the mathematical work of her husband diminished (Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.89). Albert Einstein began to ask advanced students and friends for help.> (p.426)

Prague 1911: The Einstein family in Prague
-- Albert Einstein receives a professorship (p.426) for theoretical physics (p.427)
-- the marriage between Albert and Mileva is no longer happy (p.427).

[Prague 1911: Einstein with contacts to intellectuals - Mileva must guard children
Crazy Einstein, without high math, is not only teaching physics in Prague but is also contacting Jewish intellectuals and is present at social events with intellectuals in the evenings. Mileva has to stay at home nursing children, and baby Eduard is mostly ill and undstable. Einstein does not know what is a nanny, and Mileva feels discriminated - to Einstein this is not important... - in: Video 1999 [web08]

Zurich 1912: Einstein becomes ETH professor
-- Mileva has the hope that the relationship with Einstein will be happy again (p.427)
-- Mileva hopes that old student memories could make her marriage happy again (p.427)
-- Mileva's hopes are not fulfilled (p.427)
-- Mileva's health worsens (p.427)

[1912: Einstein visits Berlin: with cousin Elsa - and defames Mileva
-- Einstein makes a visit to Berlin visiting his Jewish Einstein family
-- The Jewish Einstein family presents him a cousin Elsa, divorced, with 2 children, and so a new pair Einstein-Elsa is forming against Mileva
-- Mileva is just desperate, as Einstein does not return to his feelings, but goes emotionally more and more away from her
-- Einstein defames Mileva and laughs at Mileva in letters to Elsa [he copies the style of his Jewish mother against Mileva (!)]
-- Instead of organizing nannies, Einstein commits one emotional cruelty after another to Mileva and degrades her to the suspicious and depressed housewife (!)
in: Video 1999 [web08]

[Canton Zurich 1912: Introduction of female teacher celibacy
This woman teacher celibacy remains until 1962: Married women are not allowed to teach at universities and colleges [web07]

17.3.1913: Mileva reports to Helene Kaufler by letter: Albert has no time left for the family
(p.427)

Zurich in the middle of 1913 appr.: Albert Einstein tells Max Born of his interest in going to Berlin
(p.427)


1914: Einstein's Jewish family does not recognize the marriage between Einstein and the Orthodox Christian Mileva (!) - Jewish racism against Mileva - and Einstein permits this (!)

Early 1914: Max Planck lures Einstein to Berlin
-- Max Planck comes to Zurich to discuss Einstein's specific conditions of his position in Berlin (p.427)
-- the conditions are so good [[on paper !!!]] that Albert Einstein can not resist (p.427)
-- Einstein has [[Jewish]] relatives in Berlin (p.427)
-- Mileva Einstein-Maric does not understand why they should move to Berlin (p.427)

[because a professor position at ETH Zurich is a fairly safe place for Europe, and the family is rooted in Zurich, it could not have been better in Zurich, and Einstein family members as Mileva's family members are not so far].

-- Mileva has no friends in Berlin (p.427)
-- Mileva does not like Germany (p.427)

[[March 1914: Einstein goes to Berlin for installing - in April Mileva comes with the two sons]]
(in: Wasmayr: Die Tragödie - 2004)

April-July 1914: Mileva Einstein moves to Berlin with her two sons - the Einstein family is discriminating Mileva + does not recognize the marriage
(p.427)
-- Mileva Einstein has no access to the [[Jewish]] family circles of Einstein (p.427)

- [Apparently, the Jewish Einstein family does NOT speak with Mileva, but the DEFAMATIONS are going on - and Einstein continues to conceal  Mileva's contribution in high mathematics and her ideas for his works - it's a MAXIMUM OF CRUELTY of the Jewish Einstein family what is committed here against Mileva (!!!)]

-- the Jewish family Einstein does NOT recognize the marriage between [[the Jewish]] Einstein and [[the Christian Orthodox]] Mileva, but is making propaganda against this marriage (p.427). Plötz:

<Mileva Einstein-Maric had no friends there and disliked Germany. Albert Einstein, however, had close relatives with whom he kept in close contact. Mileva Einstein-Maric had no access to these circles, they did not acknowledge their marriage and objected to her.> (p.427)

[Einstein betrays his family with his two sons
-- Einstein follows his relatives and tells the Mileva by letter that he will act emotionless against her when other women come
-- Einstein is constantly being picked up by other women in the evening, and Mileva has to spend the night without Einstein, and the kids see all this when other Berlin women "take away" their father - and Einstein allows it all (Ripota: Einstein's unique Insights - German: Einsteins einmalige Einsichten - 2018)
-- Mileva can not accept all this and she decides to return to Zurich]

July 1914: Mileva travels from Berlin back to Zurich with both sons
[[-- shortly before the war begins, Einstein brings Mileva and his two sons to the station, Einstein cries (in: Wasmayr: Die Tragödie - 2004)]]:
-- Mileva returns to Zurich with both sons from Berlin (p.427) [[being acompanies by friend Michele Besso (in: Wasmayr: Die Tragödie - 2004)]]
-- Mileva's family urgently needs Einstein's help (p.430)
-- Albert Einstein remains in Berlin with his [[Jewish]] relatives and becomes a member of "senior organizations" (p.427)
-- Albert Einstein has thus created a "new life situation" (p.430)

[Einstein is a wimp!!!
-- Einstein lets the Jewish family dictate whom he should live with! Einstein is a bubi, an eternal child!
-- It can be assumed that the sons hated this Jewish Einstein family
-- And poverty, when Einstein's money from the war zone barely has any value due to inflation, is yet to come!]

from August 1914: Albert Einstein lives in Berlin separated from Mileva
(p.420)

[Supplement: Einstein's alimony from Berlin from 1915 to 1923 was worthless due to the war inflation in Germany during the First World War. Mileva with her two sons was pushed into poverty for 8 years. The sons were "brushed" and did not forgive this to their macho father Albert Einstein. If Einstein had stayed in Zurich, he would have been able to build up a large professorship with Mileva with many assistants and new ideas].

Berlin August 1914-1922: Einstein [is in the war zone] and can hardly support his family in Zureich [because of war inflation]
(p.420)

[because war inflation and the hyperinflation of 1923 meant that money from Berlin was worthless. Germany thought for a long time that they would win the war, and the hyperinflation of 1923 was caused by the German government itself].

Berlin - until the end of 1914: Einstein is a member of "high-level organizations"
-- Einstein becomes a member of the Prussian Academy of Sciences (p.427)
-- Einstein is director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Physics (p.427)

[Supplement: Zionist manipulation with Einstein
Criminal Zionist Jewish circles are manipulating Einstein for Israel propaganda driving all Jews into the desert against Muslims - in: Christopher Jon Bjerknes: Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist - 2002].

1914-1923: Germany loses WW1 - inflation - hyperinflation - Einstein's money is worthless - Mileva + 2 sons in Zurich suffer 8 years of poverty

[German money loses value - Mileva without money - secret borrowing of money - private lessons]

Plötz:

The First world War started. Albert Einstein advised his wife to stay in Switzerland; he refused to join them, saying that the war had no influence on his work. Mileva Einstin-Maric thought his work was the only reason keeping him in Berlin - in reality, he had found another woman, a second cousin and an appropriate partner for him now, and he quickly moved in with her. Mileva Einstein-Maric had to take care of the two children (now 4 and 10) by herself. She had no regular income. Albert Einstein did not send money regularly or in sufficient amoujnts. She was too proud to ask her family for help. Also, her children were not supposed to know that there was no money to pay for the lodging house or for their clothes. She went hungry. She wanted to give music lessons but could not leave the children alone. She finally asked a friend, who had to promise utter discretion, for a loan. When Albert Einstein eventually sent money, she could rent an apartment. He promised to take care of his family. (p.427)

She started to give private lessons in mathematics and Italian. She sent birthday gifts to Albert Einstein in Berlin. One year after she had left Berlin, Albert Einstein came to Zurich. He gave no answers to his wife's and his older son's questions about his plans for the future of the family. When back in Berlin, he again sent money irregularly and, due to devaluation, it was worth less and less. Mileva Einstein-Maric refused help from friends. She heard that Albert Einstein had moved in with his cousin, who loved luxury and fame, and fitted his present stage of life as a famous physicist. Mileva Einstein-Maric still hoped for his return. Common friends of the Einsteins in Zurich stood by her side, advised him against a divorce and reminded him of his responsibility to the family he had founded, his responsibility as a father. (p.427)

[from 1915: discussion about divorce - Mileva gets sick with multiple heart attacks]

-- Albert Einstein asks Mileva for a divorce, at the same time he says he will "he would remain faithful to her in his way" - this letter is guarded by Mileva until death (p.427 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.119)
-- Albert Einstein no longer comforts Mileva when she suffers, and after this, Mileva knows, she has lost her Einstein forever [[to Berlin and the Jewish-racist Einstein family]] (p.427 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p .119)

[Mileva never recognized her helper syndrome - and male "science" with alcohol festivities celebrates the "hysteria" of women
-- the helper syndrome was only clearly defined in psychology in 1977, by the psychoanalyst Mr. Wolfgang Schmidbauer in his famous book "helpless helpers" (original German: Die hilflosen Helfer - Amazon link)
-- "science" was blocked by criminal Sigmund Freud and the stupid alcoholic upper class calling all difficulties of women "hysterical"].

Plötz:

<Mileva Einstein-Maric became sick, had to give the children to her friend Helene, had heart attacks and was admitted and readmitted to three hospitals. The younger child, Eduard, aged 7, stayed with her in one hospital, the other with Professor Zangger, who tried to get a position for Albert Einstein again at the University of Zurich. Finally, her sister came from Yugoslavia to take care of her.> (S.427).

[1919: Germany abolishes the teachers' celibacy until 1923
and married women are allowed to teach at universities and colleges - but only until 1923, then the female teacher celibacy is reintroduced until 1951 [web07]

February 14, 1919: Divorce of Albert and Mileva Einstein - the divorce agreement of 1919 awards the future prize money to the Mileva
(p.420)

-- the divorce agreement (see "Collected Papers, Vol. 1", 1987, p. 381) provides that Mileva receives the Nobel Prize money of the future Nobel Prize (p.420)

[Rumors for Einstein as a Nobel Prize winner were going on in Stockholm since 1910. But since his robbery was known, he got the prize only in 1922 after the prediction of the sar light aberration during the eclipses of 1919 - under pressure from the Jewish Rothschild media].

-- Einstein knows that he himself can not do high mathematics and Mileva has always solved all high mathematics for him (p.420). Plötz:

<Let us assume that he was giving her private recognition for her contribution which he had not given her publicly. By then, he must have been aware of how much he owed her mathematical genius; his own genius was on the decline and he did not achieve anything comparable after what is defined as his "creative outburst of 1905".> (p.420)

14th February 1919: divorce - Einstein with gastric ulcer + first heart attack - course at the university, excursions - marriage in Berlin - German money without value

The divorce took place on February 14, 1919. This year Albert Einstein had a stomach ulcer and he had his first heart attack. At the Zurich University a class was set up, which Einstein taught. There were visits with his families, trips with his sons, and when he married his cousin, his older son, 15 years old, turned away from him (p.427).

August 1919ca .: Einstein marries again
(S.420)

[Mileva refuses any new marriage or publication of her own ability. Maybe she hopes Einstein will come back someday, when he realizes that Germany is just a chaos - organized by Rothschild].

Berlin since 1919: Einstein has to play the "genius of the century" for the Rothschild media
although he can not do high math (!!!) (p.421 - Jewish Zionists occupy Einstein for their IL propaganda: see: Christopher Jon Bjerknes: Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist - 2002)

Berlin from 1919: Einstein goes down : Einstein's "genius" without Mileva is "on the descent" - Einstein must "organize" math helpers
(S.420)
-- without Mileva Einstein is without high mathematics now (!) (p.420)
-- Einstein married as a second wife a non-scientist who does not understand science (p.420), and Einstein is even making jokes against Mileva by telling in Berlin:

"I'm glad my second wife doesn't understand anything about science because my first wife did." (p.420)

-- all later works after 1905 never approach the level of his works of 1905 (p.420)
-- Einstein, without high mathematics, has to "organize" help for high mathematics again and again, these are pupils or friends, e.g. Marcel Grossmann (p.420-421). Plötz:

<Since his second wife was chosen for different reasons, ("I'm glad my second wife doesn't understand anything about science because my first wife did"), he needed at various points someone "to solve his mathematical problems". He chose students or friends: "I encountered mathematical difficulties (p.420) which I cannot conquer. I beg for your help, as I am apparently going crazy" (Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.96) he wrote to his friend Marcel Grossmann, who then helped him.> (p.421)

[So: starting in 1919, Einstein's students in high mathematics are better than Einstein himself - and that's really a disaster].

from 1919: Blows for Mileva: Mileva's brother does not come back from Russia - father died - mother died - sister died

Plötz:

<The fate of her family in Yugoslavia brought her additional suffering: her gifted brother never returned from Russian military imprisonment; her younger sister slowly became mentally ill; her father died of heartbreak; her mother died at 88; her sister died young in 1938. Mileva Einstein-Maric had remained attached to her homeland throughout her life, and loved the Bačka [[Backa, Batshka]].> (p.428)

Berlin 1920ca.: Einstein finds a "silly mathematical transformation" - "you can prove everything"
-- an ex-student of Einstein remembers [who?]
-- Einstein got stuck in a lecture because of a "silly mathematical transformation" he could not figure out
-- the students could not either, Einstein tells them to leave half a page empty
-- then Einstein solves the transformation with a small piece of paper on the board with the commentary (p.421):

"The main thing is the result not the mathematics, because with mathematics you can prove anything" (p.421- Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.88).

Plötz:

<A former student of Einstein recalls that Albert Einstein got stuck in the middle of a lecture missing a "silly mathematical transformation" which he couldn't figure out. Since none of the students could either, he told them to leave half a page empty and gave them the result. Ten minutes later he discovered a small piece of paper and put the transformation on the blackboard, remarking: "The main thing is the result not the mathematics, for with mathematics you can prove anything" (p.421 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.88). .

Berlin 1920: Einstein is going down: Einstein announces in a letter to Ehrenfest that he has no new ideas

Plötz:

In 1920, he wrote to Paul Ehrenfest as follows (p.421 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.155):

"... I did not make any progress in the general theory of relativity.... Also on the question of electrons I didn't come up with anything. Is it my hardened brain or is the breakthrough really that far off?" (p.421)

1920-1930: Einstein much on visit to Zurich

Plötz:

In the following years, Einstein kept visiting Zurich and his family, but he could not (p.427) take care of his family in Zurich financially because of the devaluation of the German mark [[Reichsmark]] (p.428).

[Einstein travels back and forth between Berlin and the League of Nations in Geneva and "passes" on the way in Zurich.
(from: Barbara Wolff: What happened to the prize money? (original German: Was geschah mit dem Preisgeld? - 2019) - web06)]

[There is the question what Einstein did in Geneva in this League of Nations].

Stockholm 1921: The faker Einstein receives the Nobel Prize for the article "A heuristic point of view concerning the production and transformation of light"
(p.419)

Stockholm 1921: Einstein receives the Nobel Prize
and Mileva is NOT MENTIONED (!!!) (p.420)

Stockholm 1921: The faker Einstein becomes Nobel Prize winner
-- and Mileva has to stay outside, she only gets the money (p.416)
-- the life of Mileva remains unknown to the public (!) (p.416).

Einstein war seit 1910 für den Nobelpreis im Gespräch. Aber an einen Fälscher wollte man nichts geben, denn seine Fälschungen und Raubaktionen mit Werken ohne Quellen waren in Insiderkreisen der Physik bekannt. Ab 1919 ab der Sonnenfinsternis, als sich die Ablenkung des Sternlichts bestätigte, machte die Rotschild-Presse den Einstein zum weltweiten Superstar. So wuchs der Druck auf das Nobelpreiskomitee abermals, und sie musste dem Einstein einen Nobelpreis geben, aber gab dem Fälscher Einstein den Nobelpreis nicht für die von Poincarée abgeschriebene Relativitätstheorie, sondern für den "heuristischen Gesichtspunkt" ].

[1910-1921: The Rothschild press increases the pressure for Einstein to win the Nobel Prize
Einstein was in conversation since 1910 for the Nobel Prize. But one did not want to give anything to a forger, because his forgeries and robbery actions with works without sources were known in insider circles of physics. Starting in 1919, from the solar eclipse, when the distraction of the starlight was confirmed, the Rotschild press made Einstein a worldwide superstar. So the pressure on the Nobel Prize committee grew again, and it had to give the Einstein a Nobelpreis, but gave the faker Einstein the Nobelpreis not for the theory of relativity which was a copy of Poincarée, but for the "heuristic point of view" - see: Mossad Wikipedia: Albert Einstein (German version of Dec. 2019)].

[1921: Einstein is on a trip to Japan and can not pick up the Nobel Prize in Stockholm, he will pick it up only in 1922].

1922: Albert Einstein receives the Nobel Prize
(p.420)

Gothenburg [[1922]]: Einstein holds the Nobel Prize speech
at the Nobel Laureates' Congress, and Mileva is NOT present and NOT MENTIONED (p.420)

[Einstein and Mileva are TWO fakers working without sources. So, this is more a painting of numbers...
Not mentioning Mileva is a big fraud against the public in this case].

1923: Einstein travels to Zurich to give Mileva the full Nobel Peace Prize
(S.420)

[Supplement: Einstein is passing Zurich between Berlin and League of Nations in Geneva - house purchase
-- Einstein regularly travels between Berlin and Geneva (League of Nations)
-- Einstein and Mileva pick a house that could be bought with Mileva's Nobel Prize money
-- The house at Hutten Street 62 is bought, a tenement house on the Zurich Mountain (Zürichberg) with a view of the lake and the Alps
-- Mileva can now live rent-free and gets the rents from others
-- In the following years, two more houses are bought on the Hinterberg Street in Zurich Fluntern, whereby one of the two houses is working with deficit
-- and starting from 1929 starting from the world economic crisis and with son Eduard coming out as a rebel (definition: schizophrenic) Einstein with Mileva have only the crisis with the houses, and successively all houses must be sold, the Hutten Street 62 is sold finally in 1947
from: Barbara Wolff: What happened to the prize money? (German: Was geschah mit dem Preisgeld? - 2019) - web06].

[1923: Germany reintroduces female teacher celibacy
In Germany, married women, as professors at universities and colleges, are banned because they are married. This racism against women goes on until 1951, in Baden-Württemberg until 1956, in the canton of Zureich (Zurich) until 1962 - web07].

1925ca .: Einstein complains at a congress on mathematicians

"Ever since the mathematicians have taken up my theory of relativity, I don't understand it any more myself." (p.421 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.88).

Novi Sad 1929: Bridge of the son Hans Albert over the Danube
-- Einstein's son Hans Albert worked in Novi Sad on a bridge across the Danube: he did the static calculations (p.428 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.171)
-- The bridge is paid by Germany as reparation for WWI, and in WWII the bridge is destroyed again ... (p.428 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.171).


from 1929: son Eduard with rebellion against everything - the Einstein family claims that this would come from Mileva's family
Plötz:

<In 1929, the younger son, Eduard, now 19, became psychotic. From then on, Mileva Einstein-Maric hat to take care of him, taking him to doctors, paying for the enormous psychiatric expenses because he was in and out of the Burghölzli [[psycholocig experiment area for electroshocks, water torture and toxic pills etc. under Mr. Bleuler]], a psychiatric hospital [[terrorism site]] in Zurich, and especially dealing with the outbursts in which he destroyed furniture, tried to strangle her, wrote of his hate to his father whose fault it was, so he thought, that he had lost his mind. (p.428)

In Albert Einstein's family, there was certainty that he had inherited this disease from his mother's side.> (p.428)

[Criminal Jewish Einstein family against Mileva and son Eduard
-- The Jewish Einstein family not only destroyed the marriage between Albert and Mileva, but
-- This Jewish Einstein family is now inventing a heredity for "schizophrenia" and missed the opportunity to establish a psychoanalysis
-- And so Einstein not only drops Mileva, but also drops the son Eduard, and thus Einstein fails in ALL psychological areas and is certainly NOT a philosopher, but he is a criminal show-animal (conclusion [web05])].

from 1929: Einstein's son Eduard has basic mental orientation problems
-- Eduard needs constant male care (p.428) [[but only temporarily - see Wolff 2019]]
-- Eduard complains of constant earache, has attacks of schizophrenia, Mileva can not help him, and when he is at home he required all her remaining strength (p.428).

[Switzerland = Rothschild money island - wars around Switzerland - D is to break every 50 years - and the Einstein did not know that
Eduard did not know the following:
-- cr. Shitzerland (with bank secret and poison pharma and Nestlé) is the Zionist Rothschild money island in continental Europe, and all around can be destroyed by wars, so that all money flows into Switzerland, which always remains intact (indications from Swiss justice circles, and conclusion from: Knechtel: Die Rothschilds - link), and
-- Germany must be destroyed every 50 years, because that's how the Zionist Rothschilds in London have Europe in their hands, because when Germany is destroyed, 50% of the industrial production in Europe is destroyed (speech from Freedman in Washington 1961 - link)
-- Albert Einstein did NOT know that, and Eduard Einstein's mental state was broken by these circumstances and the behavior of his father's religious racist Jewish family and of his father's behavior (leaving the family, going to Germany, not even coming back after the war's defeat) so,  that's why Eduard shattered things and furniture in anger, why he wanted to "break" (strangle) others' lives out of anger because those circumstances were shattering his life, but unfortunately he had no idea of the political causes - (conclusion [web05])].

from 1929: Einstein stops talking about the Zurich family - Mileva is a teacher at the grammar school - Eduard with a guard 

-- Albert Einstein stops talking about his first marriage with Mileva (p.428)
-- Einstein's money is coming irregularly (p.428)
-- Mileva teaches physics at a grammar school (p.428)

1930s: Example of misogyny in the upper class: Hahn + Strassmann vs. Lise Meitner and Eda Nodack

-- Lisa Meitner works with Mr. Hahn for 30 years, is allegedly even the woman director of the Strassmann-Hahn team, she gives the ideas (eg the term "split"), she makes the exact, physical interpretation of the general experiments, then she is discriminated as a Jew and may no longer work at universities - Hahn and Strassmann remain and publish the work on the split of uranium, without mentioning Lisa Meitner, and later cream off the Nobel Prize, Lisa Meitner remains without anything (p.431) -
see: Fritz Krafft (1978): Lise Meitner: her life and times. On the centenary of the great scientist's birth; In: Angewandte Chemie, Ing. Ed., Engl, 17, p.826-842 (p.432)

-- At the beginning of March 1939 the research is published in the journal "Naturwissenschaften" and Strassmann + Hahn get the fame (S.431)

-- 10.3.1939: Chemist Eda Nodack informs the journal with a letter that she had the idea as early as 1934 that the nucleus of the uranium atom could break through radiation with neutrons, but she had been "persistently ignored" (p.431).

-- 20.3.1939 appr.: The editors of "Naturwissenschaften" mean that Hahn + Strassmann have "neither time nor desire to answer the letter"
see: "Ignoranz in Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, December 7, 1988 (p.431)

Zurich 1930-1948: Mileva with Diseases - Eduard with aggression and high costs

Plötz:

<Mileva Einstein-Maric's health deteriorated further, and so now, at times, she lifted the veil of her proud silence and talked with friends about the fact that Albert Einstein did not care about his sick son. A friend, Dr. Ada Broch, reminded Albert Einstein in a letter of his responsibility and asked him to send money. Mileva Einstein-Maric visited Eduard in the [[psychiatric terrorism site]] Burghölzli, in walking across town in snow and ice, she broke her leg, had to stay in hospital and felt death coming on. She worried about what would become of Eduard, by himself, with his father and brother far off in the United States.> (p.428)

-- even the younger sister of Mileva is slowly becoming mentally ill (p.428).

Novi Sad region 1936ca: Mileva's father dies of heartbreak - mother dies at the age of 88
(p.428)

[1937: Hans Albert Einstein emigrates with his family to the "USA"]
Eduard is left in Zurich with Mileva ALONE.
(in: Barbara Wolff: What happened to the prize money? (German: Was geschah mit dem Preisgeld? - 2019) - web06)

Novi Sad region 1938: Death of Mileva's sister - Mileva's last visit to Novi Sad - Mileva looks at Hans Albert's bridge

Plötz:

<Her sister died young in 1938 [...] Her son, Hans Albert, had done the static computations for a bridge over the Danube, built in 1929. During her last visit to Novi Sad, after her sister's death, she asked to be taken to the bridge, part of the reparations paid by Germany after WWI. She was very moved when she saw it, but did not say a word. For her, writes Trbuhovic-Gjuric, this bridge was more than a means of connecting the wide bankds of the Danube, it brought to realization an idea of her son in her motherland. She was not to see that son again, and the bridge was destroyed in WWII (p.428 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.171).

New York 15.2.1944: The New York Times announces a reward for the person, who finds the original manuscript of the Theory of Relativity
-- On Feb.15, 1944, NYT is announcing a reward of 11 million 500,000 US dollars (then about 46 million francs), so that the original can be integrated into the Library of Congress (p.419 - "In the shadow of Albert Einstein", Issue 1983, p.72)

[-- nobody comes (!)]

since 1945: The "USA" operate worldwide with cultural imperialism through the "US" American academic establishment
and so the Americans do not learn many things that are important to understand the world, but are only watching on their own products (p.415).

Zurich - early 1948: Mileva is thrown out of her apartment
-- On January 3, 1948, Mileva is informed that she can no longer live in her apartment in the house [[Hutten Street 62]] (p.428)
-- Mileva had planned to stay in the apartment [[Hutten Street 62]] until her death (p.428)
[[-- Mileva has to look for a cheaper apartment, not at all pleasant in winter in January]]

[Addition: The house Hutten Street 62 was sold twice - the clause to stay in the house, did not count any longer
Einstein had given the advice to install in the sales contract a clause contained that she may stay in her apartment. The house was resold within 2 months, and then this clause was void and Mileva had to look for a smaller, cheap apartment - see Barbara Wolff: What happened to the prize money? (2019) - web06]

[And this reselling maneuver may be a maneuver of two friends to cheat the Einsteins from the real worth of the house (conclusion [web05])].

May 1948: Eduard with a new attack - Mileva's collapse

Plötz:

<In May 1948, Eduard had another schizophrenic attack. Mileva Einstein-Maric broke down and was taken to a clinic. She was paralyzed on the left side of her body. She wanted to visit her son in the Burghölzli and kept ringing the bell. The bell was turned off. She lost consciousness. Her son visited her daily before her death. The day before her death, she regained full consciousness.> (p.428)

[Supplement: Mileva with 87,000 francs in the hospital
At hospital admission Mileva secretly takes 87,000 francs in notes, which are then found in the hospital. The money comes from illegally sold mortgage promissory notes to provide for Eduard and to withdraw the money from the Einstein. In the end, the sons Hans Albert and Eduard share this sum in 1950 - the remainder of the Nobel Prize money.
from: Barbara Wolff: What happened to the prize money? (German: Was geschah mit dem Preisgeld? - 2019) - web06]

Zurich 4.8.1948: Death of Mileva
Mileva died on 4.8.1948 at the age of 73 (p.428).

[The arrogance of Einstein: he never comes to Zurich again - and Mileva's estate comes to Hans Albert to Berkeley
-- Einstein never visited Mileva after 1945 even though he was retired, even though he had plenty of time, and there was every reason to celebrate World War II survival
-- Mileva's estate was collected by the wife of Einstein's first son, Hans Albert Einstein - Frieda Einstein - in Zurich, with the help of a power of attorney from Hans Albert - when there exists a withdrawn tesis of Mileva in the estate so it should have landed at Hans Albert
-- the inheritance disputes ran because of debts on the house Hutten Street 62 until 1950, finally, Hans Albert and Eduard Einstein shared the sum 87,000 francs which was found with Mileva.
from: Barbara Wolff: What happened to the prize money? (2019) - web06]

[It can be supposed that many things of Mileva's estate were thrown away because it was hardly possible to transport all books in the airplane to Berkeley. So it can be supposed that also Mileva's tesis was thrown away - or was taken by Eduard and was thrown away after his death in 1965 - or some books landed in the Social Archives in Zurich (conclusion [web05])].

Plötz: <Around that time, Albert Einstein uttered the much quoted sentence: "Only a life lived for others is worth living."> (S.428).


[Zürich 1948-1965: Einsteins Sohn Eduard 17 Jahre in der Zwangspsychiatrie Burghölzli mit Bleuler, Elektroschocks und Giftpillen - Todesanzeige ohne "Mileva Maric"]

Plötz: <After Mileva Einstein-Maric had died, her son lived more than 17 years alone in the Burghölzli, fulfilling her deepest fears.>

[Supplement: Eduard has lived in home care for many years, not always in the Burghölzli prison
see: Barbara Wolff: What happened to the prize money? (German: Was geschah mit dem Preisgeld? - 2019) - web06]

[1951: Germany abolishes female teacher celibacy - BW only in 1956
Married women are allowed to teach again as a professor at universities and colleges - web07]

[1962: The canton of Zurich abolishes female teacher celibacy
Married women in the canton of Zurich are allowed to teach as a professor at universities and colleges - web07]

Zurich 1965: Death of Einstein's son Eduard
-- in the obituary the family name of mother Mileva Einstein-Maric is missing (!) (p.428)
-- the people in Zurich do not notice Mileva, just celebrate "their" Professor Albert Einstein and his son Eduard (p.428)
-- Einstein left son Eduard when he was 4 years old, and when he got ill, Einstein never visited him (p.428)


Serbia since 1966: Science of Desanka for Mileva

Serbia 1966: Desanka Trbuhovic-Gjuric writes her Mileva biography
-- Desanka (*1897) is 69 years old (p.417)
-- Desanka (1897-1983) is a Serbian mathematician and physicist, as Mileva was (p.415)
-- Desanka taught at the Institute of Technology and at the University of Belgrade (p.415)
-- after her retirement she is investigating and writing the biography of Mileva Einstein-Maric, the first wife of Albert Einstein (p.415)


The research of Desanka: The search for data was difficult: Mileva was often hiding herself

Plötz:

<Desanka Trbuhovic-Gjuric writes in her foreword, dated Fall 1982, that she attempted to collect memories, details, and small events in the life of Mileva Einstein-Maric, about which she learned from people who knew her - relatives, friends, acquaintances - or from letters, diaries, documents, to form "a mosaic of the life from the still existing pebbles." This was certainly not an easy task, especially because, as she said, the literature contained only few observations about Mileva Einstein-Maric and those contradicted each other and were possibly tendentious to her disadvantage. But also, in contrast to Albert Einstein, Mileva Einstein-Maric was, like her mother, taciturn about her life and her experience to the point where she asked people to not talk about her.> (p.417).

Question: Why the modesty of Mileva?

Plötz:

<We cannot be content with "Mileva Einstein-Maric's modesty, her willingness to sacrifice, her kindness, her fear of publicity and avoidance of personal recognition, the unconditional devotion to the work of her genius husband and to her familiy" as an explanation of why Mileva Einstein-Maric is not known today, as the fourth edition suggests in its rather Christian blurb. For us, the mere fact that Mileva Einstein-Maric did not want to talk about her own merits, and her mathematical work for Albert Einstein, does not relieve Albert Einstein of the responsibility for his silence in this matter. He could have talked about it, but he did not.> (S.418)

Trbuhovic-Gjuric speaks of the immense self-denial in Mileva Einstein-Maric's life. Although she did not start out altruistially, she gave up all her dreams for herself when she met Albert Einstein. Her love, and his love for her, changed her life. Her love made her accept all sacrifices as meaningful because they served her husband's career. But Albert Einstein enjoyed the fruits of this fame with another woman. Mileva Einstein-Maric died lonely, worried by the sorrow about her son. "She died an impoverished old woman, pushed aside even by the clinic personnel" (p.428 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1938, pp.178, 180).

Trbuhovic-Gjuric: The book "In the Shadow of Einstein" is written without public support - it shows suppressed facts about Mileva

-- Desanka Trbuhovic-Gjuric has no financial support for researching her book (p.430)
-- Desanka is financing this work from her own pension and is sacrificing her free time (p.430)
-- The biography "In the shadow of Albert Einstein" is a pioneering work for women and unique in Einstein research (p.430)
-- Until 1990, the book "In the Shadow of Albert Einstein" is the only book on Mileva and asks new questions about the life of Einstein: questions

oo About Einstein and the women,
oo About the responsibility to his children,
oo How does he express gratitude to Mileva?
oo How was the financial support for his children and Mileva?
oo On the financial regulation concerning the house [[Hutten Street 62]], where Mileva was kicked out a short time before her death
oo On the scientific contributions of Mileva concerning the works of Einstein
(p.430 - Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p. 160, 174)

[In the book "In the shadow of Albert Einstein" are some wrong assumptions which were corrected by new research, e.g. by the documents:
-- 2004: Wasmayr: The Tragedy of the Einstein Family (orig. German: Die Tragödie der Familie Einstein) - translation link
-- 2019: Barbara Wolff: What happened with the prize money? (orig. German: Was geschah mit dem Preisgeld?) (Max Planck Institute in Munich) - translation link

Serbia 1969: Book by Desanka Trbuhovic Gjuric on Mileva: "In the shadow of Albert Einstein" in Serbian
-- The book is published by the Bagdala publishing house in Kruševać (p.415)
-- in 1969, Desanka (1897-1983) is 72 years old (p.417)
-- The Mileva biography is pioneering work in the sense of women's rights, a pioneer of feminism (p.417-418)
-- until 1983 the book remains without translation (p.415)

1969: Desanka Trbuhovic-Gjurics: Her thoughts with her book
-- Desanka knows that without Mileva the theory of relativity would not exist, this is completely new territory for worldwide physics (p.417)

[this is wrong - Einstein and his "Olypmpia" gang with Mileva only made a summary of Poincaré]

-- Desanka wonders why Mileva remains unknown, but Einstein became a world star (p.417)

[Desanka did not consider 1) the law against women of 1900, 2) the Jewish racist Einstein family against Christian Orthodox Mileva, and 3) Mileva had a helper's syndrome].

-- Desanka wonders what would have happened to Mileva if she had not met Einstein (p.417)

[respectively. The question arises, why Mileva has not taken a better man than just one who uses her in math and does not learn math himself?]

-- so far Desanka has compared her own life with Mileva's life (p.417)

-- Desanka Trbuhovic-Gjurics was born 25 years after Mileva, so in 1900 (p.417)
-- In the year of 1969, Desanka is 72 years old

-- Desanka does not complain about patriarchy, the system of male privileges (p.417)
-- Desanka does not even blame Einstein for the fact that Mileva has not made career (p.417)
-- Desanka simply mentions the "modesty" of Mileva, "who demanded no recognition, but was happy and content when Albert Einstein succeeded" (p.417)
-- Desanka does not want to confront with Einstein at the same time, but she fades him out (p.417)

The author Mrs. Trbuhovic-Gjuric: To show Mileva as a woman

Plötz:

<Trbuhovic-Gjuric's motivation was to focus on the unknown, unacknowledged, and on what was "unjustly put aside into oblivion ... without disputing the indubitable merits of the other side" (Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.5). The reader is left to draw her or his own conclusions.> (p.417)

<Throughout the book she carefully sticks to this objectivity - she never evaluates, comments on, or judges Albert Einstein's behavior. She only wants to make Mileva Einstein-Maric's life visible by collecting facts about it and she wants to make her scientific contribution known. She is uniquely qualified for this endeavor through her own biography, as a Serb with similar upbringing and identical fields, as a mathematician and physicist, and as a person with ties to Zurich. But, especially, she brings her female perspective to the task and the result is a book written with the kind of empathy a man could not have mustered. She wanted to rescue Mileva Einstein-Maric from oblivion and write her into Serbian and scientific history. She knew that no man would do that job for Mileva Einstein-Maric, whose own husband failed to give her the public recognition she deserved.> (p.417)


1969: Desanka schwärmt für Milevas Relativitätstheorie
Plötz:

<And the author, Trbuhovic-Gjuric herself, said the following about the paper (1983, p.71):

Its so pure, so unbelievably simple and elegant in its mathematical formulation - of all the revolutionary progress physics has made in this century, this work is the greatest achievement.

Even today when reading these yellowing pages printed almost 80 years ago, one feels respect and cannot but be proud that our great Serbian Mileva Einstein-Maric participated in the discovery and helped edit them. her intellect lives in those lines. In their simplicity, the equations show almost byond a doubt the personal style she always demonstrated in mathematics and in life in general. Her manner was always devoid of unnecessary complications and of pathos (p.420)

and (p.72):

In her work, she was not the co-creator of his ideas, something no one else cojld have been, but she did examine all his ideas, then discussed them with him and gave mathematical expression to his ideas about the extension of Plank's quantum theory and about the special theory of relativity ... Mileva Einstein-Maric was the first person to tell Albert Einstein after the completion of his paper: this is a great, very great and beautiful work, whereupon he sent it to the journal "Annalen der Physik" [["Annals of Physics"]] in Leipzig.> (p.420)

from 1969: No translation of Desanke's Mileva biography "In the shadow of Albert Einstein" until 1983

Plötz:

The book is nowhere translated until 1983 and so the sometimes groundbreaking truth content in Western Europe and in the "USA" remained unknown, even Einstein biographers do not perceive the book (p.415)

1970s: The equal grading of women at universities begins slowly
-- Women also rate women worse than men, which begins to change in the 1970s only (!) (p.423 - Chabot & Goldberg, 1974, Mischel, 1974, Levenson et al., 1975)
-- men maintain their lower valuation of women at universities (p.423)

Novi Sad 1975: Mileva's 100th anniversary: remembering Albert + Mileva Einstein

Plötz:

<But far off in Novi Sad in today's Yugoslavia, people apparently have a different sensibility for the matter, a different sense of time and possibly some evidence the men of Princeton do not possess: on the 100th birthday of Mileva Einstein-Maric they revealed a plaque on the Maric family residence which reads:

"In this house Albert Einstein the creator of the relativity theory and his scientific collaborator and wife stayed in 1905 and 1907."> [p.430]

[1977: Definition of helper syndrome
-- Mileva had a helper syndrome
-- The helper syndrome is clearly defined in psychology only in 1977, by the psychoanalyst Wolfgang Schmidbauer in his classic "The helpless helper" (German: "Die hilflosen Helfer" - Amazon link (German)

1980s: Collected Papers on Einstein are published
The editors say that Mileva only played an "important role" in his "development" leaving out all cientific work (p.415):

"Her personal and intellectual relationships (sic!) with the young Einstein played an important role in his development." (p.415)

1983: The Mileva biography of Desanka "In the Shadow of Einstein" comes out in German
-- Desanka Trbuhovic Gjuric's book: "In the shadow of Albert Einstein's The tragic life of Mileva Einstein-Maric", ed. by Paul Haupt-Verlag in Bern (p.415)
(German: "Im Schatten Albert Einsteins. Das tragische Leben der Mileva Einstein-Maric")
-- Now the data on Mileva should be taken seriously, but the world of high mathematics and physics or even in the ETH refuse to read the book (p.415)
-- The people at the ETH know the persistent remark of Einstein "My wife solves all my mathematical problems", but they are just laughing about it, instead of taking this statement seriously (p.415-416)

1983: Switzerland has 40 professors but over 2,000 professors
-- So something is not right there in the system of the Switzerland (p.244)
-- If this continues, then in 600 years the proportion of women in professorial posts will be 10% (p.244)

1986: Case Kempin: She gets a requiem
-- The woman composer Patricia Jünger from Basel composes a requiem for Kempin-Spyri (p.244 - web02)
-- The Requiem premieres at the 1986 Donaueschingen Music Festival (p.244)
-- The woman composer Patricia Jünger is rewarded with the Karl Sczuka Prize with 15,000 DM (p.244 - web02)
-- So many women deserve a requiem who had studied around 1900 and that men have turned them to hell (p.244).

1987: Princeton: "Collected Papers" Volume 1 appears with letters until 1902
Plötz clearly states that the Collected Papers do not devote a cent to women's research around Mileva Einstein (p.430):

<"The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein" is an enormous endeavor, funded by numerous foundations and by the wealth of private persons. If only one-hundredth of the resources were expended on Mileva Einstein-Maric and other women physicists and mathematicians of our time, we could answer all our questions. .> (p.430)

1988: The fourth edition of Desanka "In the Shadow of Albert Einstein" appears - pages of content is eliminated and has been added
The bound edition of the book is not so cheap (p.415).

yyy1988: Die 4. Ausgabe des Buches "Im Schatten von Albert Einstein" - "der Herausgeber" ohne Name löscht 3 Seiten und fügt neue Seiten hinzu

Die jugoslawische Autorin beantwortet einige dieser Fragen. Sie erzählt von einem Leben und Schicksal, das jede/n bewegt und das bei LeserInnen, die über das Schweigen der Frauenstimmen und die Vernichtung der Frauenarbeit Bescheid wissen, eine tiefe Anerkennung findet. Seit ich dieses Buch zum ersten Mal gelesen habe, hat es mich verfolgt. Ich konnte es nicht beiseite legen. Ich musste es gleich noch einmal lesen; ich musste nur in privaten Gesprächen und in öffentlichen Vorträgen immer wieder darüber sprechen. - Die Autorin ist jetzt tot; ich hätte mich gern mit ihr unterhalten. Ich traue der deutschen Fassung des Buches nicht, die keinen Übersetzer nennt, sondern einfach "redaktionelle Bearbeitung" von derselben Person angibt, die nun in der vierten Auflage zum "Herausgeber" avanciert und das Original geändert hat. Also, das Buch hat unmarkierte [1] (S.416)

[1] Hinzufügung von zwei Buchstaben, S. 139-140 und S. 196-197; ein Auszug aus einem Brief S.202; Hinzufügung von Text im Postscript des Herausgebers, S. 212-213.

und markierte [2] Ergänzungen (S.416),

[2] An drei Stellen wird ein Nachtrag hinzugefügt; S. 48-52, S. 59-78 und S. 161-162.

aber da wurden nun auch drei Seiten gestrichen und ein eigener 17-seitiger Text wurde ersetzt. Wie können wir wissen, welche Änderungen er durch seine erste "redaktionelle Überarbeitung" der deutschen Übersetzung vorgenommen hat - Trbuhovic-Gjuric hat möglicherweise ihr Buch selbst ins Deutsche übersetzt - oder, wenn er auch der Übersetzer war, durch seine eigene Übersetzung? (S.416)

Der Herausgeber [[Paul Haupt in Bern]] begründet seine Änderungen mit dem Hinweis auf neues Material, das insbesondere in "Die Gesammelten Dokumente von Albert Einstein" [[englisch: The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein]], Band 1" (1987) ans Licht gekommen ist. Möglicherweise hat er jedoch die eigentliche Motivation unbeabsichtigt in einem Zusatz zu seinem Nachtrag (unmarkiert) preisgegeben. Dort zitiert er eine Passage von Trbuhovic-Gjuric (die er aus dem Text der neuen Ausgabe herausgearbeitet hatte), in der der Autor Mileva Einstein-Maric als Unterstützung für Albert Einstein bezeichnete, zu einer Zeit, als keiner seiner Professoren etwas für ihn tun wollte. Und als er wiederholt abgelehnt wurde, als er sich um eine Stelle bewarb. Trbuhovic-Gjuric schreibt, dass Mileva Einstein-Maric ihn unterstützt hat (S.416):

Mit ihrer unendlichen Liebe, die es ihr ermöglichte, an ihn zu glauben und ihn vollständig zu verstehen. Sie war die Quelle seiner Hoffnung und seines Vertrauens in seine eigenen Ideen. Sie war die einzige, die ihm nicht nur emotional zur Seite stand, sondern auch aufgrund ihres wissenschaftlichen Verständnisses, in dem sie ihm ebenbürtig war. Diese Unterstützung war stärker als alle feindlichen Kräfte der Welt. Sie half ihm auch, gegen seine eigene Natur zu kämpfen, denn er traf Entscheidungen schnell, änderte sie aber genauso schnell. Ihre Entscheidungen brauchten Zeit, um zu reifen, aber dann waren sie unwiderruflich. Wahrhaftigkeit und Integrität von Wort und Tat waren Teil ihres harmonischen Charakters (Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, S. 58-59). [3] (S.416)

[3] Dieses Zitat und alle anderen Auszüge aus deutschen Texten wurden vom Autor dieses Artikels übersetzt.

1988: Vierte Ausgabe von "Im Schatten von Albert Einstein"
-- der Herausgeber ohne Name bezweifelt die intellektuelle Gleichheit von Einstein und Mileva (S.421)

Bern 1988: Die 4. Ausgabe des Buches "Im Schatten von Albert Einstein": Der Herausgeber Paul Haupt in Bern streicht aus dem Buch "Im Schatten von Albert Einstein", was er will

Der Herausgeber [[Paul Haupt in Bern]] hinterfragt das, was er als "provokativen Kern dieser Charakterisierung" bezeichnet, das gleiche wissenschaftliche Verständnis, und stellt fest, dass:

Was auch immer der Fall gewesen sein mag, Einstein fühlte sich zu der Zeit, als er seine grundlegenden Entdeckungen machte, genauso und drückte es mit diesen Worten aus, die jetzt ans Licht kamen: "Wie glücklich ich bin, dass ich in Dir eine ebenbürtige Kreatur gefunden habe, die gleich kräftig und selbständig ist wie ich selbst. " (Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1988, S. 213) [4] (S.416)

[4] Dieses Zitat stammt aus Albert Einsteins Brief an Mileva Einstein-Maric vom 3. Oktober 1900 (Collected Papers, Band 1, 1987, S. 267).

Aber anstatt Albert Einsteins eigene Aussage als Beweis für die Hypothese von Trbuhovic-Gjuric heranzuziehen, ließ er [[der Herausgeber in Bern]] ihre Beschreibung von Mileva Einstein-Maric nicht stehen, sondern löschte sie einfach aus. Dennoch schlussfolgert er in einer wahrhaft scheinheiligen Weise (Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1988, S.213):

Man kann sich keinen schöneren Zufall vorstellen: Die Tatsache, dass die Idee und die Auswahl der von Einstein und Trbuhovic-Gjuric verwendeten Ausdrücke übereinstimmen, spricht sehr gut für das Buch, wie die Autor es hinerlassen hat. (S.416)

Das ist ziemlich vieldeutig: meint er das serbische Original, das wir nicht lesen können, oder die überarbeitete Version, die er uns jetzt anbietet [S.416] und für die aufgrund seiner Absicht die Vereinbarung nicht mehr in Anspruch genommen werden kann? Es ist ein großartiges Beispiel für Ironie, dass er ein Buch anpreist, das er nicht unberührt lassen konnte, und eine Autorin anpreist, dessen Worte er nicht billigte und an der er herumspielen musste, während er uns eine Version des Buches aufzwang, das die Autorin uns gar nicht hinterlassen hat! (S.417)

"Physics Today" 1989: Harris Walker officially asks if Einstein has represented ideas of Mileva
In a letter to Physics Today, Harris Walker asks clearly whether Einstein has just represented Mileva's ideas, "Did Einstein espouse his spouse's ideas?" (p.430)

1990: Mileva's work for Einstein is still almost unknown
(S.416)

The original of the book "In the Shadow of Albert Einstein" was inaccessible - the second edition of 1983 is the basis contained in "The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, Vol.1"

Plötz:

<Since the original is not accessible to me and the fourth edition does not have the credibility of the book I originally read, I will now stay with the second edition of 1983 which, l by the way, is listed as a biiographical source in "The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 1".> (S.417)

1990: ETH continues to be a male society
-- Shortly before 1990, the first full woman professor was appointed at ETH (p.422)
-- For female students, ETH remains "not a hospitable place" (p.422)
-- Women in math + physics studies are scarce, and still less become get an assistant job (p.422)

AAAS 1990: For male Einstein biographers, the fate of Mileva is not important - and so it is with all women at the side of "famous" men

Plötz clearly means:
-- Male authors never acknowledge women for their scientific contributions (p.430)
-- Some men, however, begin to ask questions in the case of Einstein, e.g. Harris Walker on "Physics Today" in February 1989 entitled "Did Einstein espouse his spouse's ideas?" (p.430)
-- Not even Mileva's housework and childcare is recognized by Einstein to defend Einstein for having time to teach (p.430).

AAAS 1990: Vortrag von Plötz: These von Plötz: Mileva hätte ohne Einstein eine großartige Karriere gemacht (?!)]

Plötz:

<But going back to Mileva Einstein-Maric, there is another factor which we should consider (and which not surprisingly is also at play in Emilie Kempin-Spyri's life). Mileva Einstein-Maric most certainly would have gotten both her Diplom [[diploma]] and her doctorate had she not met Albert Einstein.

[Tesis: Then she just would have had fallen in love with another man being exploited].

When she fell in love, she worked together WITH him. Or rather, when they worked together, she fell in love with him. Once she was committed to him, however, she worked for him instead of for herself - out of love. She may not even have noticed the difference at first because she kept working more than ever, but her love did change her very strong dedication to her studies in that she no longer pursued them in the interest of her own career, but rather of his.> (p.424)


AAAS 1990: Missing social services for intelligent Women

-- Women often still today (as of 1990) only choose between children or work (p.424), also in Germany (p.425)
-- Trömel-Plötz has written her own study about this topic what conditions must be fulfilled concerning child care so also women can make a career (p.425 - Trömel-Plötz: fathers and school: Why the German school remains as exploitative as it is (original German: Väter und Schule: Warum die deutsche Schule so ausbeuterisch bleibt, wie sie ist); In: Uta Enders-Dragässer & Claudia Fuchs (Eds.): Women's Matter School (original German: Frauensache Schule). Frankfurt, Fischer pocket book edition)
-- The same problem exists in the "USA" with women in a science career, well, the best constellation is for women when the husband is a Dr. in a different discipline, to an integration is achieved, while at the same time it will be sure that the man does not help (p. 425 - Barbara F. Reskin: Sex differentiation and the social organization of science. In: Sociological Inquiry 48, p.3-4, 6- 37)

from 1990: Mileva research is on the rise - new books are announced - many letters are still sealed in depots

Plötz:

<The two books that have been announced by the Zurich publisher Origo, one, a book of memoirs by a woman named Julia Niggli, who talks a lot about the Einsteins, and another one, the letters of Mileva Einstein-Maric and Albert Einstein between 1897 and 1938, might still appear and answer some [p.430] questions. So far "legal impediments" have hindered their appearance (Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.80). The letters are kept inaccessible in the Estate of Albert Einstein in New York (Trbuhovic-Gjuric, 1983, p.173) or in the Einstein Family Correspondence Trust, Los Angeles. They might still be published at some point in the future. After all, Einstein has been dead for 34 years.> (p.431)

---

The patterns of wrong male and female behavior - summary

Plötz:

<We can see so many patterns in this life story:
-- Men who take the beauty, youth, and health of women and leave when these are gone [p.428]
-- Men who take the intelligence and energy of women and make them work: they expect women to do the household chores and all the other everyday work that is needed; they expect them to take care of the children; they expect them to create a home atmosphere free of worries; they expect to be free for their work; they expect them to do their work, type for them, do their correspondence, go to the library, etc.; they exspect them to give them ideas, stimulate them, advise them, comfort them, support them, be their muses, hostesses, companions, nurses, and therapists.
-- Men who leave their first wife when children come, leave her to do all the work with small children on her own.
-- Men who do not care for their children, other than verbally repeating their commitment.
-- Men who do not even feel financially responsible for their children and shirk alimony payment. (In West Germany today [[in 1990]], 50% of men do not pay alimony for their children; in the United States, the figure is said to be higher).
-- Men who quickly find new, usually younger companions for a second marriage; mostly these companions are well in sight before they leave their first wife.

-- Women who change their life once they fall in love and whose life is changed, whether they want it or not, once they marry and have children.
-- Women who feel responsibility toward their children and take it as their natural duty to do the work for society of bringing up the next generation without getting any recognition or help for it.
-- Women who do NOT quickly find a second, younger, and energetic husband who will help them bring up the children.
-- Women who have no leisure time to pursue their academic, artistic, or other interests once they have children.
-- Women who have to fight for survival because their husbands do not support them.
-- Women who, having come from wealthy background or having taken care of themselves independently, end up in poverty after divorce [9].

[9] Cf. the New Jersey Reports on "Women in the Courts" with the finding that the distribution of income and property after divorce, no matter what social class a couple belong to, is unfair to the women. See also: "Michigan Bar Journal, 63" (6), June 1984 and Crites, Laura L., & Hepperle, Winfred L. (Eds.). (1987). "women, the courts and equality". Newbury Park: Sage.

-- Women, who started out as promising, got better grades as students than their husbands, and find themselves not advancing in their career with the same speed as their husbands.
-- Women who find it difficult to keep up their work, who have worse working conditions, usually working at night, who finally, overburdened, give up their creative work altogether.
-- Women whose ideas and work is appropriated by men, their husbands, professors, fellow students, and published under the men's names.

We know these patterns, but we do not apply them yet, think by them, write by them, judge by them when we are dealing with a woman's life. So it comes as no surprise that the editors of Volume 1 of the "Collected Papers of Albert Einstein", which covers, however, only the time before his marriage, cannot find any evidence that Mileva Einstein-Maric's role was more than "a sounding board for Einstein's ideas". I would not be surprised if not even the next volume, which is to cover the crucial period before and after 1905, would discover any trace of Mileva Einstein-Maric's part in their joint work. "The Collected Papers" are firmly grounded in the tradition of constructing man's success and deconstructing woman's contributions. They are themselves a beautiful example of how it is done.> [p.429]


ENDNOTEN

[[sind im Text integriert]]


QUELLEN

Abramson, Joan (1975): "The invisible woman: discrimination in the academic profession". San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bosmajian, Haig (1974): "The language of oppression". Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.

Chabot, Donna S., & Goldberg, Philip (1974): "Prejudice against women: a replication and extension". [[In]]: Psychological Reports, 35, 478.

Condry, John, & Condry, Sandra (1976): "Sex differences: a study of the eye of the beholder". [[In]]: Child Development, 47, 812-819.

Crites, Laura L., & Hepperle, Winfred L. (Eds.) (1961): "women, the courts and equality". Newbury Park: Sage.

DeSole, Gloria, & Hoffman, Leonore (Eds.) (1961): "Rocking the boat: academic women and academic processes". New York: Modern Language Association of America.

Elman, Judith B., Press, Ann, & Rosenkrantz, Paul S. (1970, August): "Sex roles and self concepts: real and ideal." Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Miami.

Farley Jennie (1982): "Academic women and employment discriminations: a critical annotated bibliography". Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Geis, Florence, Carter, Mac R., & Butler-Thompson, Dore (1982): "Research on seeing and evaluating people". Newark, DE: University of Delaware.

Goldberg, Philip (1968): "Are women prejudiced against women?" [[In]]: Trans-Action, 5, 28-30.

Gruber, Kenneth J., & Gaebelein, Jacquelyn (1979): "Sex differences in listening comprehension"; [[In]]: Sex Roles, 5 (3), 299-310.

Haber B. (1981): "Why not the best and the brightest? Equal opportunity or academic freedom". [[In]]: Forum, January, 15-25.

Hagen, Randi L., & Kahn, Arnold (1975): "Discrimination against competent women". [[In]]: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, p.362-376

Howe, Florence (Ed.) (1975): "Women and the power to change". New York: McGraw Hill. [p.431]

Joffe, Abram F. (1960): "Meetings with physicists: my reminiscences of foreign physicists". Moscow: State Publishing House of Physics and Mathematics Literature.

Krafft, Fritz (1978): "Lise Meitner: her life and times. On the centenary of the great scientist's birth". [[In]]: Angew. Chemie, Int. Ed., Engl., 17", p.826-842.

Kramarae, Cheris (1984): "Nachrichten zu sprechen gestatte ich der Frau nicht". In: Senta Troemel-Ploetz (Ed.): "Gewalt durch Sprache". Frankfurt: Fischer Verlag

Kramarae, Cheris (Ed.) (1988): "Technology and women's voices: keeping in touch". New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Levenson, Hanna, Burford, Brent, Bonno, Bobbie, & Davis, Loren (1975): "Are women still prejudiced against women? A replication and extension of Goldberg's study". [[In]]: "Journal of Psychology, 89", p.67-71.

Mills, Kay (1988): "A placein the news: from the women's pages to the front page". New York: Dodd, Mead.

Mischel, Harriet N. (1974): "Sex bias in the evaluation of professional achievements". [[In]]: Journal of Educational Psychology, 66", p.157-166

New Jersey Supreme Court Task Force on Women in the Courts (1984, 1986): "Women in the courts". [[In]]: Reports I and II. Brunswick, NJ: New Jersey Supreme Court.

Nieva, Veronica F., & Gutek, Barbara A. (1980): "Sex effects on evaluation". [[In]]: Academy of Management Review, 5" (2), p.267-276

Peterson, Gail I., Kiesler, Sara B., & Goldberg, Philip (1971): "Evaluation of performance of women as function of their sex, achievement and personal history". [[In]]: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19", p.114-118

Piacente, Beth S., Penner, Louisa, Hawkins, Harold L., & Cohen, Stephen L. (1974): "Evaluation of the performance of the experimenters as a funciton of their sex and competence". [[In]]: "Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4", p.321-329

Reskin, Barbara F. (1978): "Sex differentiation and the social organization of science". [[In]]: "Sociologidcal Inquiry 48", p.3-4, p.6-37

Rosenkrantz, Paul S., Vogel, Susan R., Bee, Helen, Broverman, Inge K., & Broverman, Donald R. (1968): "Sex-role stereotypes and self concepts in college students". [[In]]: "Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32", p.287-295

Rossi, Alice S., & Calderwood, Ann. (Eds.) (1973): "Academic women on the move". New York: Russell Sage Foundation

Sanders, Marlene, & Cock, Marsha (1988): "Waiting for prime time: the women of television news". Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press

Seyfried, B.A., & Hendricks, Clyde (1973): "When do opposites attract? When they are opposite in sex and sex role attitudes". [[In]]: "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25", p.5-20

Spencer, Mary L., Kehoe, Monika, & Speece, Karen (Eds.) (1982): "Handbook for women scholars: strategies for success". San Francisco: Center for women Scholars, American Behavioral Research Corporation.

Spender, Dale (1982): "Invisible women: the schooling scandal". London: Writers and Readers Cooperative Society, Ltd.

Stachel, John (Ed.) (1987): "The collected papers of Albert Einstein, Vol. 1. The early years, 1897-1902". Princeton: Princeton University Press

Starr, Ruana M., & Denmark, Florence L. (1974): "Discrimination against apiring women". [[In]]: International Journal of Group Tensions, 4", p.65-70

Thorne, Barrie, Kramarae, Cheris, & Henley, Nancy (Eds.) (1983): "Language, gender and society". Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Trbuhovic-Gjuric, Desanka (1983): "Im Schatten Albert Einsteins: Das tragische Leben der Mileva Einstein-Maric". Bern: Paul Haupt -- Treichler, Paula, & Kramarae, Cheris (1983): "Women's talk in the ivory tower". [[In]]: Communication Quarterly 31" (2), p.118-132

Troemel-Ploetz, Senta (Ed.) (1984): "Gewalt durch Sprache: Die Vergewaltigung von Frauen in Gesprächen". Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch-Verlag

Troemel-Ploetzx, Senta (1990): "Väter und Schue: Warum die deutsche Schule so ausbeuterisch bleibt,wie sie ist". IN: Uta Enders-Dragäser & Claudia Fuchs (Eds.): "Frauensache Schule". Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch-Verlag

Whitaker, James O., & Meade, Robert D. (1967): "Sex of the communicator as a variable in source credibility". [[In]]: Journal of Social Psychology, 72", p.27-34

Woodgli, Susanna (1975): "Gleichbereichtigung: Der Kampf um die politischen Rechte der Frau in der Schweiz". Frauenfeld: Huber

[p.432]

<<          >>

š   ć

ß

Sources
[web01] https://www.wikiwand.com/de/Patricia_Jünger
[web02] Karl-Sczuka-Preis 18.10.1986: "Sehr geehrter Herr - Ein Requiem": http://web.ard.de/ard-chronik/index/2059
[web03] Mossad-Wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patricia_Jünger
[web04] Evan Harris Walker: Ms. Einstein (1990): https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/13fbac_491f456c13d2467e8731acdd828a3851.pdf, p.4
[web05] Schlussfolgerung Michael Palomino
[web06] Barbara Wolff: Der Nobelpreis für Physik für das Jahr 1921 – was geschah mit dem Preisgeld?
https://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/sites/default/files/P493.pdf
[web07] Mossad-Wikipedia: Lehrerinnenzölibat: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehrerinnenzölibat
[web08] Милева Марић: Ајнштајн из сенке (Mileva Marić: In the shadow of Einstein - 1999):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6xAfVGRLNA (29min.) - YouTube channel: DzonsonBor

^